NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  FLYATT Carbon

  

  The bounce is only so-so, but the ball release alone is as fast as a full-on carbon blade.

  I'd recommend using thick rubber on it.

  If you go with medium thickness, the ball flies off before you can even put spin on it, so there's no stability.
  Since the bounce is weak for a carbon blade, pairing it with thick rubber to get some ball-holding and speed isn't a bad combination.
  Since it's light to begin with, you can swing it fine even with max-thickness rubber on both sides.

  That said, whether it's worth going that far is another question.

  If you're at a level where you can handle max-thickness tension rubber on both sides, you'll play a lot better with a different blade.

  This blade is really only suited for players who are satisfied with Flyat Soft rubber.

  It's the kind of blade for someone just past the beginner stage who wants to cheaply try out "what is carbon like anyway."

  See original review Hide original review

  弾みはそこそこですが、球離れだけは本格カーボン並みに早いラケットです。

  貼るラバーは、厚めを推奨。

  中とかだと、回転をかける前に吹っ飛びますので、安定感はありません。
  カーボンの割に弾みは弱いので、厚いラバーで、球持ちとスピードを確保すれば、まぁ組み合わせとしては、悪くありません。
  もともと軽いので、両面特厚でも十分に振れます。

  ただ、そこまでして、使おうと思うかは別。

  両面特厚テンションを使えるレベルであれば、ラケットを別のものにした方が、ずっと良いプレーができます。

  このラケットの対象は、ラバーがフライアットソフトで満足できるレベルまで。

  脱初心者が、「カーボンってどんなのかなー」で安価に試すだけのラケットですね。

  2020/01/27

  Overall	5/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	3
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) FLYATT HARD

  Recommend rubber(Back) FLYATT SOFT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  REINFORCE LT

  

  Even though it's a special material blade, it produces a really nice arc.
  Among inner-type blades, it has top-class arc and excellent stability.
  It's light, yet it flies about as much as a 7-ply blade around the level of the SWAT Power, so you can really feel the bounce.

  I can recommend this even to top elementary and junior high players who attack aggressively with topspin drives.

  For rubber, I'd recommend pairing it with something that flies in a straight line, like Rasant or 64.
  An arc-heavy rubber would also work, but it seems a waste when the blade itself already creates the arc.

  Alternatively, a tacky rubber meant for light-contact grazing shots might also be good.

  
  For example, this would suit a player who started in the early years of elementary school and is graduating from a kids' blade around 5th or 6th grade,
  or a female middle/high school student whose main weapon is the drive,
  or, for boys, a control-oriented player who focuses on topspin rallies.

  This is the blade that would fit best in those cases.

  See original review Hide original review

  特殊素材ラケットなのに、とにかく弧線が出ます。
  インナータイプの中でもトップクラスの弧線で安定感抜群。
  軽いのに、スワットパワーあたりの7枚合板と同じくらい飛ぶので、かなり弾みを感じられます。

  小・中学生で、ドライブでグイグイ攻める選手にはトップ選手でもオススメできます。

  ラバーは、ラザンターや64など、直線的に飛ぶラバーを合わせた方が良いでしょう。
  弧線ラバーでも良いですが、せっかくラケットで弧線を作れるのにもったいない。

  あるいは、当て擦り専門の粘着ラバーも良いかもしれません。

  
  例えば、小学生低学年から取り組んでいる選手が、5,6年生になって子供用ラケットを卒業するとき、
  あるいはドライブ主戦の女子中高生、
  男子であればラリー重視のコントロール志向選手。

  このあたりには、ベストフィットするラケットです。

  2020/02/19

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) RASANTER V47

  Recommend rubber(Back) MANTRA M

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  Backspin is easy to lift, draws an arc easily, and gets solid spin on top of that.

  ...But! On drives off a block, or in topspin rallies, the ball leaves the rubber too fast — it feels like it flies off before the spin even catches, and the ball ends up feeling light too.

  The "anyone can easily get spin on it" feeling that Tenergy had is completely absent — this is a rubber that picks its user.

  Sure, with a top player's impact it probably produces more spin than Tenergy, but opinions among us regular players will likely be split.

  At least for me, I couldn't handle it.

  See original review Hide original review

  下回転は持ち上げやすく、簡単に弧線を描き、なおかつがっつりと回転がかかってくれます。

  ・・・が！ブロックしてもらってのドライブ、あるいはドライブでの引き合いでは、球が離れるのが早すぎて、回転がかかる前に飛んで行ってしまう感覚があり、ボールも軽くなってしまいました。

  テナジーにあった「誰でも簡単に回転がかかる」と言う感覚は皆無で、使う人を選ぶラバーです。

  確かに、トップ選手のインパクトであれば、テナジー以上の回転を生み出せるのでしょうが、我々一般人では評価は分かれるでしょう。

  少なくとも私には扱えませんでした。

  2019/07/15

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Butterfly Hadraw VK

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  Galleon

  

  An offensive 5-ply blade that was originally designed for Matsuzawa.

  It bounces more than the Acoustic, but is more restrained than hardwoods like ebony or wenge types.

  It's a fairly thin blade, but the flex isn't all that strong — the feel is like a mellowed-out hardwood.

  It naturally pairs well with tension rubbers, but it also goes with tacky rubbers, and even with short pips mounted, the ball releases at a moderate rate, making it easy to use. Long pips would probably bounce a bit too much for a block-oriented style.

  As mentioned, it doesn't flex hard like the Or Evo or the Acoustic — the ball-holding is about average for a 5-ply blade.

  Overall, my impression is that it's like a "lighter Tenor."

  Maybe because of how the grip is mounted fairly deep despite the flared handle — holding it normally isn't much of an issue, but if you grip deep, your middle finger touches the blade.

  
  Recent 5-ply blades seem almost desperate to stand out with some unique trait, whether that's going all-in on flex or pushing ball-release speed with surface treatments or hard woods, but among those, this one turns out to be a well-balanced board with moderate bounce and moderate ball-holding.

  On the flip side, that also means it lacks personality, and even though it's built to top-player specs, it feels like it's gotten a bit lost in the crowd (lol).

  See original review Hide original review

  もともと松澤選手向けに設計された攻撃用5枚合板。

  アコースティックよりも弾み、エバンやウェンジ系のハードウッドよりは控えめ。

  薄めの板ですが、しなりはそこまで強くなく、ハードウッド系をマイルドにした打球感。

  テンションはもちろん、粘着とも合わせやすく、また表ソフトを貼っても、適度な球離れで使いやすい。粒高はブロック主戦では少し弾みすぎるでしょう。

  先述の通り、オルエボやアコースティックのように、ガッツリしなる、というわけではなく、球持ちは、5枚合板の中では普通。

  全体的なイメージは、「軽めのテナー」ですね。

  エラが張っているわりに、グリップが深めに取り付けてあるせいでしょうか。
  普通に持つ分にはそこまで気にはなりませんが、深く握ると中指が当たります。

  
  最近の5枚合板は、ややもすると、しなり一辺倒になったり、表面加工や硬い木材で球離れを早めにしたりと、個性を押し出すことに躍起になっている感がありますが、その中で、適度に弾み、適度にボールを持つ、バランスの良い板に仕上がっています。

  逆に、そこが没個性で、トップ選手仕様なのに、埋もれてしまった感がありますけれど(笑)。

  2018/09/28

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) SUPER VENTUS

  Recommend rubber(Back) Ventus Spin

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  Offensive reflex system

  

  The blade itself is pretty hard, releases the ball quickly, and flies well.
  This blade uses a Reflex System to make that hard wood feel softer.

  Because of that gap between the feel on contact and how the ball actually flies, if you go in expecting a normal wood blade, you'll be pretty surprised.

  For rubber, I'd recommend something on the softer side to balance out the hard blade.

  See original review Hide original review

  板自体は、かなり硬めで、球離れも早く、よく飛びます。
  その硬い板を、リフレックスシステムを使うことで、柔らかく感じさせているラケットです。

  それにより打球感と飛びの感覚に、大きな差が出るため、木材合板だと思って使うと、かなりビックリします。

  ラバーは、硬いラケットに合わせるような、やや柔らかめのラバーが良いでしょう。

  2018/06/18

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Ventus Spin

  Recommend rubber(Back) ROZENA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. Next >