NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO BLUE

  

  I'll compare it to DHS's Provincial Team Hurricane NEO3 Blue Sponge. This one is nearly 20g heavier, and even though it's brand new, the sheet had marks that looked like stains — typical of Chinese-made sheets, which was a letdown.
  It might partly be due to swing speed, but bounce, power, and spin are all higher on the DHS one. Like I felt with Turbo Orange, it bounces more than you'd expect for a Hurricane/Pro rubber, so it feels pretty good to hit, but I also felt that the extra bounce makes it harder to produce tricky, spin-heavy balls. Once you know DHS, you end up feeling that it's the better one. That said, this one produces more of that tricky character than Turbo Orange, so if you're committed to Japanese-made rubber, it's a solid option.
  By the way, my blade is a Hurricane 301, which has the same construction as the Long 5 and is a heavy blade. It's not like it's a blade that clashes with tacky rubber, but someone I played against told me that the combination of a Zhang Jike blade with Dignics has more speed, spin, and ball weight than this combination. Just for reference.

  See original review Hide original review

  DHSの省ﾁｰﾑ用ｷｮｳﾋｮｳNEO3ﾌﾞﾙｰｽﾎﾟﾝｼﾞと比較します。重さは20g近く重く、新品なのにｼｰﾄには汚れたような跡があり、流石中国製ｼｰﾄで残念でした。
  ｽｲﾝｸﾞｽﾋﾟｰﾄﾞの関係もあるかもしれませんが弾みや威力、回転量はやはりDHSの方が上です。ﾀｰﾎﾞｵﾚﾝｼﾞの時も感じましたがｷｮｳﾋｮｳやﾌﾟﾛの割には弾むので結構気持ちよく打てますが、弾む分癖球は出にくいとも感じました。やはりDHSを知っているとそちらの方が良いと感じてしまいます。ただしﾀｰﾎﾞｵﾚﾝｼﾞよりは癖は出やすく日本製ラバーにこだわるならありだと思います。
  因みにラケットはｷｮｳﾋｮｳ301で龍5と構成は同じで重たいラケットです。決して粘着にあわないラケットではないはずですが、この組み合わせよりも張継科とディグの組み合わせの方がスピード、回転量、ボールの重さは上と相手していただいた方に言われました。ご参考ください。

  2019/12/27

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket HURRICANE LONG 5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  154

• 

  OMEGA VII TOUR

  

  This is a comparison with Tenergy 05 Hard and Dignics 05.
  Compared to 05 Hard, the spin is a bit weaker, but I felt I could hit drives that are more linear and faster.
  As for the feel, 05 Hard felt like the ball sinks in less, and I felt the VII Tour was better suited to fast, repeated hitting.
  05 Hard and the VII Tour are about the same weight and quite similar overall — I think 05 Hard's strength is spin, while the VII Tour's strength is speed.
  Next, the comparison with Dignics.
  Compared to Dignics, I think the VII Tour is weaker in both speed and spin.
  The key point is the feel: Dignics is harder to handle and you need to learn how to hit with it specifically, whereas the VII Tour is a true spin-type tension rubber — if you can handle a hard spin-type tension rubber or a tacky rubber, you should be able to handle this fine.
  It's also a rubber that combines outstanding speed and spin even among spin-type tension rubbers.
  It's cheaper than Tenergy 05 or 05 Hard, and in terms of positioning, I felt you could call it something like a Tenergy 80 Hard(?).
  Definitely give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  Tenergy05HardとDignics05との比較になります。
  05Hardと比較すると、回転量は若干劣るものの直線的でよりスピードのあるドライブが打てると感じました。
  打球感は05Hardの方が食い込みにくいと感じ、VIIツアーの方が連打に向くと感じました。
  05HardもVIIツアーも同じくらいの重さでかなり似ていて、05Hardは回転、VIIツアーはスピード、に特徴を持つのだと思います。
  続いてDignicsとの比較です。
  Dignicsと比較すると、スピード、回転、共にVIIツアーが劣ると思います。
  ポイントは打球感で、Dignicsは扱いにくくDignicsの打ち方を覚える必要がある一方で、VIIツアーはまさにスピン系テンションラバーであり、硬いスピン系テンションや粘着ラバーが扱えれば十分に扱えると思います。
  またスピン系テンションの中でも抜群のスピードと回転を両立するラバーです。
  Tenergy05や05Hardと比較して低価格であり、ポジションとしてはTenergy80Hard(?)と言えると感じました。
  是非試してみてください。

  2019/09/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  150

• 

  DIGNICS 64

  

  Max thickness, 45g.
  Good points
  - Light!
  - Easier to handle than Dignics 05 and 80! But still properly a Dignics!
  - Meet hits go exactly where you aim them!
  - Pushes and stops bite and stop firmly if you catch them with the sheet!
  - Blocks settle down easily too.
  - Less sensitive to incoming spin than the other Dignics rubbers.
  - Still has that Dignics trait of being easy to counter-drive with.
  Bad points
  - The amount of spin does drop, as expected.
  - It draws an arc, but because the spin drops, the ball doesn't settle down as well from spin.
  - When you want it to grip the ball, it doesn't grip as much as you'd expect. The ball comes off the rubber fast.
  That's about it.
  It might be a good one to use to get used to Dignics. It's probably the easiest to handle of the bunch, but it still has that Dignics character, so if Dignics in general doesn't suit you, your opinion of this one will definitely be bad too.
  Since the spin drops a bit and the ball comes off fast, if I use it, it'll be on my backhand.
  Hope this helps.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚45g。
  良い点
  ・軽い！
  ・ディグ05、80と比較して扱いやすい！でもちゃんとディグニクス！
  ・ミートが思った通りに飛ばせる！
  ・ツッツキ、ストップはシートでひっかければしっかり切れて止まる！
  ・ブロックもおさまりやすい。
  ・他のディグより、回転に対しては鈍感。
  ・ディグの特徴、カウンタードライブのしやすさも顕在。
  悪い点
  ・回転量はやはり落ちる。
  ・弧線を描くが回転量が落ちる分、回転でおさまりにくい。
  ・ボールを掴んでほしい時に思ったよりつかまない。球離れが速いと感じる。
  以上になります。
  ディグに慣れるために使うのはありかもしれません。1番扱いやすいと言えば扱いやすいですが、ディグらしさもあるので、そもそもディグニクスがあわない方は評価が確実に悪くなるでしょう。
  回転量が少し落ちますし球離れが速いので自分は使うならバック面になります。
  ご参考ください。

  2020/07/17

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  149

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  I previously posted a review for the backhand side, but this is my first time posting a second review for the same piece of equipment — this time it's about the forehand side.
  It's hard to feel the ball holding onto the rubber, and if you don't consciously drag the ball, it leaves the rubber before the spin catches. But once you figure out the right way to spin the ball with this rubber, it turns out to be an extremely high-performance rubber that lets you hit balls with more speed × spin = destructive power than ever before. If you're used to tacky rubber, I think this feeling of putting spin on the ball will make sense to you right away.
  From here on this is just my own personal opinion, but as for why Butterfly released a rubber like this — it's not a great way to put it, but it felt pretty close to the sensation of using the organic solvents that are currently banned. In other words, I think this is equipment meant to let you compete under the current rules against DHS, which dominates as the world's number one. It's easy to counter-drive even against super-spun balls! It's a rubber that can stand up to drives from tacky rubber too! I think using this rubber well opens up new possibilities to challenge yourself, so I'd recommend giving it a try at least once.

  See original review Hide original review

  バック面でのレビューを挙げさせていただきましたが、初めて同じ用具で2度目の投稿になります。フォア面でのレビューです。
  球持ちを感じにくく引きつれを意識しないと回転がかかる前に球離れしてしまいますが、このラバーにあった回転のかけ方が分かると今まで以上のスピード×回転＝破壊力のボールが打てる超高性能なラバーでした。粘着を使っていた人ならこの回転をかける感覚はわかりやすいと思います。
  ここからは自分の勝手な見解ですが、何故このようなラバーをバタフライが発売したのか、表現は良くないでしょうが現在禁止されている有機溶剤を使用したような感覚にかなり近いと感じました。つまり世界１位を席巻する紅双嬉と現ルールを守って勝負するための用具なのだと思います。超回転のボールにもカウンタードライブが打ちやすい！粘着ラバーのドライブにも立ち向かうことのできるラバーです！このラバーを使いこなすことで新たな可能性に挑戦できると思うので一度は使ってみることをオススメします。

  2019/08/25

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  147

• 

  DNA PRO H

  

  Used on the backhand, normally I use 05 Hard, weight was 51g.
  Compared to the 05 series, I think the max amount of spin is about the same or a bit less.
  But it has the amount of spin and arc typical of a spin-oriented tension rubber, and I think you can get a lot of spin out of it depending on your stroke and how used to it you get.
  It's probably a product designed with Tenergy 05 in mind, so switching over from 05 should be easy aside from the weight.
  The points where I felt it was better than the 05 series were the delicate-touch techniques like blocking, connecting shots, and stops.
  True to a German-style rubber, while the ball quality drops a bit, it felt like the ball would go in even with sloppy hitting.
  Blocking was quite easy, and the ball went in regardless of the drive's spin amount, and it was also noticeably easier to handle knuckle balls and other ordinary balls during rallies.
  Hitting with just the topsheet doesn't produce much bounce, so stops stuck dead too.
  On the flip side, what needed some getting used to were drives and chiquitas against backspin — there were a lot of net misses and overshoots, making it difficult, and the spin was also a bit tame, so it was easy for opponents to return.
  DNA has a grip feel like 05 and attacking power above the passing line, while the ease of all the delicate-touch techniques besides drives, and how easily the ball goes in on the table, are considerably better than 05 — worth it if you're focused on winning.

  See original review Hide original review

  バック使用、普段は05ハード、重量は51g。
  05系と比較すると回転量のMaxは同等以下だと思います。
  が、スピン系テンションらしい回転量と弧線で、打ち方や慣れ次第で高い回転量は出ると思います。
  おそらくテナ05を意識した製品だと思いますので、テナ05からの移行は、重量以外はしやすいと思います。
  05系より良いと感じた点はブロック、つなぎ、ストップなどのタッチが繊細な技術でした。
  ドイツ系ラバーらしく、球質は下がる一方で、雑に打っても入ってくれる感じがありました。
  ブロックがかなりしやすくてドライブの回転量に関係なく入れやすくまたナックルとか何でもないラリー中のボールに対しても格段に入れやすかったです。
  シートだけで打つと弾まないのでストップもビタ止まりでした。
  逆に慣れが必要なのが、下回転系に対するドライブやチキータで、ネットミスやオーバーミスが多くて難しく、回転量もやや大人しくて返球されやすかったです。
  DNAは05のようなグリップ感と合格ライン以上の攻撃力を持ちながら、ドライブ以外の繊細なタッチの技術全般のやりやすさ、台への入れやすさは、05よりかなり良く勝ちにこだわるならありでした。

  2020/02/04

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  145

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9
10. 10
11. 11
12. Next >