|Experience||More than ２０ years|
I used the Kyoto leopard NEO 3 Blue Sponge on the F side, made a spherical change with F and B and used to compensate for the slowness of swing speed of B. What was good was
· Stability and power of B drive!
· At the time of rally, the power of the connection B by the automatic upper rotation imparting function explodes!
· Even though there is a sense of stability with high rotation performance, a spherical quality with a feeling of dynamism and speed!
. There are aspects that my ability is not enough to bring out its goodness yet, but it is becoming a trump card for someone who will not let me drive the F drive quite well. If I could clear up even the cost, I felt that my ability would definitely be acquired by being accustomed to being able to spin with the awareness of digging into the spring sponge. I think that it is a wonderful rubber which is no more in table tennis which B is definitely more important.
In addition to supplementing the slowness of swing speed of B, high rotation speed and speed due to high energy conversion efficiency, ball elongation are indispensable for modern table tennis. Please use it on side B by all means. If you are good at B 05!
Overall9/10 Speed9 Spin9 Control9 Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket FORTIUS FT ver.D
It is a flying racket feels that it is extremely close to the hit feeling when using old rubber and old organic solvents.
The sharpness of driving and meat running method, sharpness when entering the partner's coat is outstanding, I think that this price is useless for this super destructive power.
On the other hand, I think that receiving and tabletop are fairly delicate, and I think that it is necessary to practice mainly the flick, which is similar to the speed of the hit point, the bush nature and the stop, and the flick close to the aggressive meat rather than spinning. Or you can float, so if you can not play like putting it back from the blocking game first, I think that I will not make it easily because I lost points on the battle and receive.
Rubber is not that we can not use stickiness, but because it becomes sensitive to the opponent's rotation, I think that the tension rubber is easier to handle both for the foreback and the racket's characteristics will be useful.
Why do not you take the speed craziness you want to overwhelm with super destructive power by all means?
Overall8/10 Speed10 Spin7 Control6 Touch6 Hardness Little soft
I tried striking my own rubber by not using a friend.
Although it was heavy weight, it was easy to put a lot of rotation on the hand center of gravity.
It was a shot feeling that the special material of ZLC comes out before when I strongly impacted as reputed. When going for this strong punch, the swing speed felt it needed the speed of special material burr. Light and medium strokes are images of 5 woods, banging is ZLC.
I do not dislike ZLC's hit feeling, but I felt that mistakes seemed to be noticeable if I bang with a sense of light hit if I did not get used to it. Personally I felt that ALC might be better for comprehension because the difference between ZLC trajectory and ALC's trajectory is not clear level.
In order to win in the game, I felt it would be a style that Receive and Taizo steadily spin at the inner, and hit hard with a rally in a rally firmly. In that sense I think ZLC is preeminent to usability.
I thought that I was also the main racket.
However, I would like to compare it with the inner ALC.
Overall9/10 Speed8 Spin9 Control8 Touch9 Hardness Little hard
I used it on the B side.
It was not bad at all. It was not a stuttering feeling, it was a hard rubber like a painted organic solvent on an old slave bar. It was a rubber that grips the ball firmly even though the rubber itself was subjected to considerable tension and was easy to handle.
However, I used only the rubber which adopted the spring sponge for the past 1 year on the B side, it got a habit of putting in rotation while letting it bite in, and the result of B drive almost dropped. If it was a loop drive it seemed to strike yet, but I could not hit a B drive with a comfortable running feeling. Meat striking, on the other hand, was considerably easier than rubber with sponge sponge. I felt that this is what the spring sponge is trying to spin even if it hits like a meat.
When F is good at B, it chooses a person a little, it may be that one who likes butterfly is not suitable.
Overall5/10 Speed8 Spin7 Control8 Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket FORTIUS FT ver.D
Since racket was not in choice, I made it to ALC but it becomes Timorbol Spirit.
Used on the back side. Purchased in anticipation of a function that tenacity's arbitrary upward rotation will take.
I tried using it, but it certainly had a hit feel like close to tenazi, but I felt that it was not as tenazy as I used it.
Especially the point which I did not like is the amount of rotation. Actually, even with the performance value of the manufacturer, the amount of rotation is lower than tenazi, so it can not be helped if it can not be helped. Even when it goes down again, although the initial speed is early, the second speed is slow, that is, the amount of rotation is small. It may be that the upper rotation is arbitrarily applied, but it was disappointing that the amount of rotation is weak. If this is the case then tennesse is better.
It is a cheap version of tenazi as a summary.
The inferior point is 2 points, the rotation performance and the power of the sphere when it falls.
Overall8/10 Speed8 Spin6 Control7 Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.