NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Q3

  

  2.1mm medium pen fore surface used. While comparing with other Q series ...
  First of all, there is a tendency for bomb speed and straight trajectory. It is a ball that pierces with a low trajectory compared to the quite arcuate trajectory of Q4 and Q5.
  The rotation performance is quite high. I think that you can bring out a lot of rotation performance by rubbing relying on the sheet instead of the type that bites into the sponge.
  It also has a very good feel for meat and blocks. In particular, the only drawback of Q4 is that it feels like flying up without permission, and it feels like you're controlling it yourself.
  As a caveat, I think that it is strange that Tsutsuki and stops are common and common.
  As a general comment, I think that it is very individual and suitable for players who want decisive power. There are many opinions that this rubber is suitable for backing, but I feel that it is a bit inevitable if it is backing. For me, I think it's for the foreground of a pendora that is hard to cover but can control the arc. I like speed drive from loop drive because the score is very high.
  I think that Q4 is quite unique in the Q series, but I personally like Q3 because it has the strongest loop drive.

  See original review Hide original review

  中ペンフォア面2.1mm使用。他のQシリーズとの比較も交えながら…
  まず傾向としては爆速かつ直線弾道といったところ。Q4、Q5のかなり弧線的な弾道と比べると低弾道で突き刺さるようなボールです。
  回転性能に関してはかなり高いです。スポンジに食い込ませるタイプではなくシートに頼った擦りうちでかなりの回転性能を引き出せると思います。
  またミートやブロックに関しても非常に感触が良いです。特にQ4の唯一の欠点である勝手に上に飛んでってしまうような感覚は薄く自分でコントロールしてる感覚があります。
  注意としてはQシリーズ共通の妙にツッツキやストップが低く出る点だと思います。
  総評としては非常に個性的で決定力を求める選手に向いてると思います。よくこのラバーはバック向きという意見が多いですがバックだと少し勿体無いような気もします。私としては面が立ちがちなペンドラのフォア面向きかなと思います。
  QシリーズだとQ4もかなり個性的だと思いますが自分的にはQ3が一番強烈なループドライブが出せるので一番気に入っています。

  2020/01/29

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket MA LIN CARBON

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Q4

  

  2.1mm medium pen fore surface used. While comparing with other Q series ...
  The trend is super arc trajectory, which is quite arc trajectory compared to Q3. However, when I meet, I think that the feeling of flying straight is close to sticky rubber.
  Anyway, the ball comes out on top, so the stability of the drive is amazing. It may be the slowest in terms of drive speed compared to other Q series, but the drive stability is the best. What tends to be aimed at the counter because it comes out high is a defect in the ball.
  The only drawback is that there is an image that blocks and flicks fly like "bine". I feel a bit uncomfortable with blocks and flicks.
  As a general review, it is a drive-only rubber that is recommended for the gorgeous drive type. I think it is recommended for those who just want to push with a drive.
  If you want to do unique table tennis in the Q series, I think this is Q3, but I think Q4 is more accurate.

  See original review Hide original review

  中ペンフォア面2.1mm使用。他のQシリーズとの比較も交えながら…
  傾向としては超弧線弾道、Q3と比べると相当な弧線弾道です。しかしミートすると真っ直ぐ飛ぶ感じは粘着ラバーに近いと思います。
  とにかく上にボールが出るのでドライブの安定感が凄いです。他のQシリーズと比較するとドライブの速度という面では一番遅いかもしれませんがドライブの安定感は一番あります。高く出るのでカウンター狙われがちなのは玉に瑕ですが。
  唯一の欠点としはブロックやフリック等が「バイン」といった感じで飛んでくイメージがあるところでしょうか。ブロックやフリックでちょっと気持ち悪さを感じます。
  総評としてはゴリゴリのドライブタイプにオススメのドライブ専用ラバー。ひたすらにドライブで押していきたいという人にオススメだと思います。
  Qシリーズで個性的な卓球やりたいならこれかQ3だと思いますがQ4のほうが間違いが無いと思います。

  2020/01/30

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket MA LIN CARBON

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  VJC>07 STICKY EXTRA

  

  Compare with similar adhesive tension (Shoryu Genesis 2).
  First of all, if you compare with these two, it will not fly. It's almost as elastic as possible.
  Rotation is slightly sticky in China, Xianglong> Genesis 2 ≧ vjc ≧ Genesis
  The price is average.
  Certainly not for middle-senior and advanced players. I think there are more different options if you are more than intermediate.
  If it's a gentle word, it might be for adhesive beginners. However, if you are a person who uses tension, you will be dissatisfied with the momentum.
  So is it for people who have been using high-elastic rubber and want to use adhesive tension from now on?
  However, it is harder than I expected, and it is difficult if there is no power compared to the Genesis 2 Spin S and Genesis S.

  See original review Hide original review

  似たようなの粘着テンション（翔龍・ジェネシス2）と比較します。
  まずこの2つと比較すれば飛びません。高弾性並かなと。
  回転は中国粘着的に言えば微粘着、翔龍＞ジェネシス2≧vjc ≧ジェネシス
  値段は平均並。
  中上級者向けではないのは確かです。中級者以上ならもっと違う選択肢があると思います。
  優しい言い方をすれば粘着初心者向けかなと。ただテンションを使ってた人だと弾みがに不満が出ると思うので、テンションからの移行はかなり難しいと思います。
  なのでいままで高弾性ラバーを使っててこれからは粘着テンションを使いたい人向けでしょうか。
  ただ硬度が思ってるより硬くジェネシス2スピンSやジェネシスSあたりと比べると力が無いと難しいですね。

  2019/09/11

  Overall	4/10
  Speed	2
  Spin	4
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ALNADE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  Booster SA

  

  Rotation is good for the table soft rubber, it is hard to slip, the speed is moderate. If it says, it sounds good to hear, but is this normal behind? It is a feeling. It is a personal opinion to the end that it is not a very good rubber if it is seen as a back soft which has a little slippage which is hard to be rotated.
  Even with the way to hit the table software etc., the ball like the back soft flew away often.
  People who are promoting this by the transition from the back soft rubber are seen in this review site but I think that it would be better to quit absolutely. It becomes just soft deterioration soft rubber.
  I think that you can use it well if you are an advanced software user.

  See original review Hide original review

  表ソフトラバーの割には回転が良くかかります、滑りづらいです、スピードも中々です。というと聞こえはいいんですけど、これ普通に裏で良いのでは？という感じです。ちょっと回転のかかりづらい滑りが多少ある裏ソフトとみるとあまり良いラバーではないなと、あくまで個人の感想ですが。
  表ソフト特有の打ち方等しても裏ソフトみたいボールが飛んでいってしまうことが多々。
  裏ソフトラバーからの移行でこれを進めてる人がこのレビューサイトでは見かけますが絶対に辞めた方がいいと思います。ただの劣化裏ソフトラバーになってしまいます。
  表ソフト上級者の方なら上手に使えると思います。

  2018/12/14

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	4
  Control	2
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  GENESIS II S

  

  Used with thick back of the pen.
  Both the seat and the sponge are so soft that they are not sticky of Chinese type, but the unique feeling of shot feeling is stickiness itself.
  Although I do not get much speed, even painful blocks or meat draw arcs arbitrarily and will fit on the table. Moreover, it stretches after it bounces strangely.
  The feeling of holding the ball when blocking is amazing.
  From the above characteristics, it is a rubber for a player who wants to hit a backhand with a sense of stability rather than in a foreground direction.
  As mentioned above, the shot feeling is as good as I choose people. I feel that it is close to the feeling that it was thinly chuck painted on Muka Takines. I feel less comfortable.

  See original review Hide original review

  ペン裏面特厚で使用。
  シートもスポンジも柔らかく中国系の粘着っぽくはないですが独特なベチャッとした打球感は粘着そのもの。
  スピードはあまり出ないですが、苦し紛れのブロックとかミートですら勝手に弧線描いて台に収まってくれます。しかも妙にバウンドしたあと伸びます。
  ブロックしてる時ボールをホールドしてる感じはすごいですね。
  以上の特性からフォア向きというよりは安定感のあるバックハンドを打ちたい選手向けのラバーかなと。
  ただ先に述べたように打球感はベチャッとしてて人を選びます。むかーしタキネスCに薄くチャック塗ってた感覚に近いような気がします。気持ちよさは少ないですね。

  2019/02/10

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >