NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  SYMMETRY

  

  Use medium thickness. This rubber is somewhat special. For table rubber it is better to have balls, depending on the person may not fit. Moreover, if you rotate also rubbing on the surface it will be difficult to spin the rotation, it will rotate by rubbing as if hooked.
  People choose, but I think that the block is made like a table rubber, and I think there is something that the counter for the drive pretty glows. Also the control of light strikes and bench technology is quite good.
  I would like to continue to patronize from now on.

  See original review Hide original review

  中厚を使用。このラバーはちょっと特殊。表ラバーにしては球持ちが良く、人によっては合わないかもしれません。また回転も表面で擦ると回転がかかりづらく、引っ掛けるように擦ることで回転がかかります。
  人は選びますがブロックは表ラバーらしく出来て、ドライブに対するカウンターはかなり光るものがあると思います。また軽打や台上技術のコントロールもかなり良いです。
  自分はこれからも愛用していきたいと思います。

  2018/12/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	6
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  13

• 

  MANTRA H

  

  First of all, the merit is that the rubber snag is good and hard, so if you drive against a gun, you drive a low linear trajectory with a low trajectory.
  Also rubbing on the surface of the rubber will not go too far forward so the loop drive will be short and short.
  Blocks are good for fitting hard. Easy to control.
  The best advantage would be the counter drive in the former team. I think that the control at the time of matching with the opponent's drive in a rising taste is very good.
  Even with cost performance it is excellent and I think that it is unique.
  The disadvantage is heavy and hard. Well Well, if you dislike hard rubber in the first place, I do not think H will choose, but I think that it is harder than you think. Mantra M is probably about the hardness of the other rubber hard. Why is it harder than that. Weight is also quite concomitant with that.
  I guess it's pretty tough to beat behind the middle team. Inquiries are also impossible, coupled with the low trajectory, but it is difficult. Why are you thinking that it is the rubber of a person who is good at the former team ~ middle team. If anything I think it's oriented toward the foreground.

  See original review Hide original review

  まずメリットはラバーの引っかかりが良くかつ硬いのでガツンと当ててドライブをすると弾道の低い直線的なドライブがでます。
  またラバーの表面で擦ると余り前に出過ぎないためループドライブが低く短くでます。
  ブロックは硬い割には収まりが良いです。コントロールしやすい。
  一番の長所は前陣でのカウンタードライブでしょう。相手のドライブにライジング気味で合わせた時のコントロールは非常に優れていると思います。
  コストパフォーマンスでみても優秀だし、個性的だと思います。
  デメリットは重い、そして硬いです。まぁそもそも硬いラバーが嫌いな方はHは選ばないとは思いますが。
  あとは中陣よりさらに後ろで打つのはかなり厳しいかと。弾道の低さも相まって引き合いは無理ではないですが難しいです。なんで前陣〜中陣を得意にしてる人のラバーだと思います。どちらかと言えばフォア向きだと思います。

  2019/03/03

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket CLIPPER CR WRB

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  AZAREA Offensive

  

  Use Pen Ace 75g. The beauty of the appearance is unusual and the tension rises.
  When it is a slap, it is a bit funny with the sound of squeezing. When I hit the drive, I felt the softness I felt good. Though it is a characteristic hit feeling that feels the hardness of the core when it meets it. There are also 5 sheets of plywood and it resonates well in the hand.
  It is a racket that can make you feel bad about yourself if you think about it. When I hit hard, both control and speed are good, but when I hit ambiguous, it is over or direct to the net. When you hit the drive, let it be firm and when you meet, you're in the center. I can feel the importance of such basics.
  When I look at the appearance and the explanation, I feel that it is suitable for beginners, but I think that it is a racket that middle class people are convinced by far than I thought. But I think that there is a need to make up with the rubber side because the impetus is moderate.

  See original review Hide original review

  ペンエース75gを使用。見た目の美しさが異常でテンション上がります。
  軽打のときはカコンという音でちょっと面白いです。ドライブを打つとよくしなりたしかな柔らかさを感じます。なのにミートすると芯の硬さを感じるような特徴的な打球感です。5枚合板なのもあって手によく響きます。
  総評しちゃうと自分の下手さを痛感させられるラケットだなと。しっかり打てたときはコントロール、スピードともにいいのですが、曖昧な打ち方をするとオーバー、もしくはネット直行。ドライブを打つときはしっかりとしならせて、ミートするときは中心で捉える。そういった基礎の大切さを痛感させられます。
  見た目や説明を見ると初級者向けかなって感じるんですけど思ってたよりずっと中級者が納得するようなラケットだと思います。ただ弾みは大人しいのでラバーのほうで補う必要性があるとは思います。

  2019/04/14

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） GENESIS II M

  Recommend rubber（Back） VJ>07 REGULAR

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  ALNADE

  

  Uses 90g of pen inside.
  The momentum is the average of the outer or below. The weight is relatively light, and considering the nature of PB carbon, it will be inevitable.
  The ball feels softer as an outer. I feel the breadth of the sweet spot with a uniform feel at impact, packed tightly by weight. There is a sense of grabbing the ball for a moment and flying it.
  However, it is just “as an outer” and feels faster than the inner or wood type.
  I think that it has excellent control power when viewed as an outer, and high control power when viewed from the overall racket. All the balls are easy to drive and both the drive and meet will fly as intended.
  As the title suggests, the outer racket is probably an honor student. I don't feel anything out of control, but it's easy to use as an outer racket and has a firm outer appearance.
  However, as a precaution, the grip is thick and difficult to sharpen as a pen in this racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  中ペン90gを使用。
  弾みはアウター平均かそれ以下。重量が比較的軽め、PBカーボンの性質を考えると仕方ないでしょう。
  打球感はアウターとしては柔らかいほうかと。重量にしてはしっかりと詰まった、均一な打球感でスイートスポットの広さを感じます。球を一瞬掴んで飛ばす感覚があります。
  ただあくまで「アウターとしては」でありインナーや木材系に比べると球離れの早さを感じます。
  アウターとしてみると優れたコントロール力、ラケット全般で見ても高いコントロール力があると思います。揃ったボールがいきやすくドライブ、ミートともに割と狙い通り飛んでいきます。
  総じて表題にもある通りアウターラケットの優等生かなと。コントロール以外は抜きん出たものは感じませんがとにかくアウターラケットにしては使いやすくかつアウターらしさもしっかりと持っています。
  ただ注意点としてはこのラケット中ペンとしてはグリップが太く、また削り辛いです。

  2019/09/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） Bluestorm Z1

  Recommend rubber（Back） BLUESTORM BIGSLAM

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  BLUESTORM Z1 TURBO

  

  Use the inside pen front side, MAX +.
  As a good point, speed such as speed drive and smash became faster than I thought that it was stuck on 5 sheets of plywood. Also the amount of rotation is perfect. If you use an online shop, you can get it for about 4,000 yen, but it is the performance of Buchigiri at the same price range.
  There aren't many bad things, but it doesn't sound so much. I don't feel the hardness at 50 degrees, but the feel at impact feels vague. There are times when it takes a great time without having a sense of turning. However, this is a matter of taste, so it may not be a bad point. The arc is quite low ballistic and aggressive, as it is not good or bad either. Even if it is a loop, it will be considerably low if it strikes in the sense of usual rubber. However, the low ballistic loop with a large amount of rotation is quite difficult to obtain, and this is also a preference.
  I think that it is a moderate rubber for players who fight in the main game in the middle and aft. Tenagi Dignix is expensive and it's highly recommended for people who want to be more individual with more tools. Is there at least almost no loss in speed?

  See original review Hide original review

  中ペンフォア面、MAX+を使用。
  5枚合板に貼ったと思えないほどスピードドライブやスマッシュ等の速度が速いです。回転量も高い。そして何より短いサーブ、ストップがしやすく回転量が凄い。というのもシートが薄いせいかシート単体では弾み抑え目なので薄く切ると全然前にいきません。初めはそれでミスが多発しました。でスポンジに到達した瞬間すごい勢いで球が飛んでくと。なので緩急がハッキリとしてます。
  それなりのボールタッチとスイングスピードは必要ですが慣れれば期待に答えてくれるラバーです。と言っても好みハッキリとするラバーではありますが安く買えば4000円程度でこれだけハイエンドなラバー買えるなら一度試してみては？

  2019/05/06

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket AZAREA Offensive

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. Next >