ゲンガー's profile

ゲンガー's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
      Racket

      Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Developed with and used by Tomokazu HarimotoSimilar to Innerforce Layer ALC with moderate speed a...
    2. TENERGY 80
      Rubber (Front)

      TENERGY 80

      • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
    3. DNA PLATINUM H
      Rubber (Back)

      DNA PLATINUM H

User review

  • Swat

    User review

    I used the VICTAS-made FL. It weighed 88.5g.
    Being all wood, you can really feel yourself gripping the ball. The sweet spot is also wide, so as long as you make contact with the blade you'll be fine, which gives it outstanding block stability. It's a blade I can also recommend to beginners who can't yet consistently make good contact with the blade.
    It can also generate plenty of power on offense, so I think it's a blade with really excellent value for money.

    See original review

    2022/10/30
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Ventus Spin

    Recommend rubber(Back) Ventus Speed

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • GLAYZER

    User review

    On an Innerforce blade, max thickness, 45.2g.
    The bounce feels about the same as Tenergy 80.
    Every technique is easy to do and stable, but overall it feels like a well-rounded rubber that produces clean balls, similar to Rakza 7 or Ventus Extra.
    It's also strong against topspin, but surprisingly, loop drives against backspin barely get any spin on them. So unless you hit backspin balls thick and low, you'll get countered easily.
    Because of that, you end up scoring points by working the corners rather than overpowering people.
    The rubber is light, so I think it's good for people using a heavy blade.
    Otherwise, at the same price point after discount, I think Evolution MX-P or V20 give you more spin and speed.

    See original review

    2023/04/09
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • DNA PRO M

    User review

    I borrowed a friend's and gave it a try. It was on a Clipper Wood, max thickness.
    The topsheet is soft, so it feels softer than its sponge hardness suggests, and I think it suits the backhand better than the forehand. The trajectory is fairly straight, the power is about average, and it's easy to hit flat shots with.
    I normally use Tenergy 80, and this doesn't fly as much as I expected.
    That said, it gave me a sense of security when hitting straight shots, since it stays controlled.
    On the backhand, it felt like just the right hardness - blocks stayed in and flat hits were easy, so overall it felt good. That said, if you brush the ball with the topsheet, it won't fly, so you need to let the ball sink into the sponge.
    The trajectory reminds me of Vega X, and the manageability reminds me of Vega Tour.

    See original review

    2022/12/11
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket CLIPPER WOOD

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • TENERGY 05

    User review

    I played with the max thickness version on a Harimoto Innerforce Layer ALC. Weight was 48.2g
    Even compared to Tenergy 80, the spin performance is a clear step above and produces a heavy ball. Since it has that auto-drive quality, even a normal block bites into the ball right after the bounce, so it looked hard for opponents to handle.
    That said, it feels harder than Tenergy 80 and bounces more too.
    I think it's also a good option to use on your weaker side, taking advantage of that "auto" feeling. There are other rubbers out there that just get the ball on the table without much effort, but the Tenergy 05 clearly puts more spin on the ball and produces a noticeably higher quality shot.
    Flat hitting on the backhand isn't especially hard either, but since it generates so much spin, you inevitably end up with more of an arc.
    For backspin balls, it was better to hit early and let the ball sink into the sponge. Dropping your contact point and brushing the ball with the sheet wasn't very stable, partly because of how much it bounces. I think this rubber suits modern table tennis, where you hit hard on an early contact point.
    Also, for players with a weaker impact, the ball didn't seem to come through with much force, so if it feels too hard when you try it, I think Tenergy 80 would be a better fit.

    See original review

    2022/11/12
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    10
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little hard
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • User review

    I was looking for a light blade to use on the backhand side, so I bought this.
    The bare blade weighs 66g; I played with short pips on the forehand and inverted rubber on the backhand.
    Since it has carbon in it, it bounces more than pure wood and the feel is on the harder side, but because the blade itself is light, it's still easy to handle.
    With the Segun blade, the wood feel was strong, so I used vertical-grain Morist SP to boost the bounce, but with this blade it's the opposite - the ball leaves it fast, so I felt horizontal-grain rubber worked better if you're putting short pips on it.
    On the backhand I had Vega Tour on, and other than the extra bounce, there wasn't anything hard to deal with.

    See original review

    2022/10/30
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    6
    Control
    7
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Booster SA

    Recommend rubber(Back) VEGA TOUR

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style