ゲンガー's profile

ゲンガー's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
      Racket

      Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Developed with and used by Tomokazu HarimotoSimilar to Innerforce Layer ALC with moderate speed a...
    2. TENERGY 80
      Rubber (Front)

      TENERGY 80

      • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
    3. DNA PLATINUM H
      Rubber (Back)

      DNA PLATINUM H

User review

  • Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

    User review

    I used FL. weight is 85g
    The blade is larger than the inner force layer ALC, so it can be entered even if it misses. With the center of gravity closer to the tip, the power when swinging firmly increased, but I started to feel the weight of the racket.
    With the rubber stretched, the inner force ALC is 187g, while the Harimoto inner ALC is 181g, which is 6g lighter, but the inner force layer feels lighter and easier to swing when driving.
    I chose a light individual racket, but it seems to be tough if both sides are made in Germany. Is it stable to put a relatively light tenergy on at least one side?

    See original review

    2022/11/06
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    10
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 80

    Recommend rubber(Back) EVOLUTION EL-D

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Fastarc G-1

    User review

    I hit the thickness with the back of the inner force layer ALC. weight is 45g
    I can put it in for the time being, so there is a sense of stability.
    Chiquita is easy to do because it is often caught on the sheet.
    However, if you receive a loop drive, it will fall.
    I felt it was much harder than Rosena of the same type of rubber.
    It is a rubber that comes in as an option when you want hardness than Rosena.
    The list price is more than 1000 yen higher than Rosena, but I think it's worth it if you consider the lifespan.

    See original review

    2022/10/30
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • User review

    SWAT, I hit 2.0 mm on the fore of the inner force layer ALC. Weight is 47.1g with inner force layer ALC
    The arc line is moderate and speed comes out.
    If you have an impact, you can see the feeling of grabbing the ball and putting power on it.
    I just feel harder than V20. With my own ability, it is suitable for the fore and it is tough for the back.
    I think that it is better to use it after you can hit the drive firmly.
    I thought it would be better to match it with wood or inner because it has hardness.
    Especially compatibility with SWAT is outstandingly good.

    See original review

    2022/10/17
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • GLAYZER09C

    User review

    Extra thick 44.2g inner force
    Compare with Glazer.
    It doesn't bounce more clearly than the Glaser, but I didn't feel the hardness.
    The place where it enters stably is the same as Glaser.
    The upper rotation is good because the ball weighs more than the glazer as much as you hit it hard.
    As for the downward rotation, the loop drive that rubs with the sheet like the glazer does not rotate as expected and is easily countered.
    So it is necessary to put it in thickly, but it was easier to put in than the glazer.
    Also, since the arc line comes out, it is easy to aim at the course.
    It felt good on the back too.

    See original review

    2023/04/09
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • QUANTUMX PRO SOFT

    User review

    43.7g with 2.0mm on MK7
    It is a rubber that feels safe to hit because it is soft.
    This was a feeling that also led to the Evolution MX-P.
    However, compared to MX-P and Quantum X Pro, it is shallow and inferior in power.
    I thought it would be better to use it in the back.

    See original review

    2023/04/09
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket MK7

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. < Previous
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. Next >
  13. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!