ゲンガー's profile

ゲンガー's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
      Racket

      Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Developed with and used by Tomokazu HarimotoSimilar to Innerforce Layer ALC with moderate speed a...
    2. TENERGY 80
      Rubber (Front)

      TENERGY 80

      • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
    3. DNA PLATINUM H
      Rubber (Back)

      DNA PLATINUM H

User review

  • JEKYLL&HYDE X47.5

    User review

    I hit 1.9mm with the inner force layer. Weight is 46.1g
    I put V47.5 on the back and hit it. This is a comparison with V47.5 (hereafter V).
    Compared to the V, the grain interval of the seat is wider, and you can feel the softness of the seat in a pile-up.
    Lower trajectory than V. I was a little worried because I was hitting it on the net.
    The feel is different, but in terms of trajectory, I think you should have an image of Tenergy 80 for V and Tenergy 64 for X.
    I don't really understand, but I felt X was harder.
    If you rub the seat against the downward rotation, you won't feel the difference from the V, but when you hit it hard, the V will give you an arc, so there was a sense of stability.
    Also, there is nothing that can be done without X, so I think it is better to use V because it has a sense of stability. I have a bit of a meat back, but I didn't really understand the goodness of X.
    In other words, it may be good for those who want a more straight trajectory.

    See original review

    2023/01/08
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Tenergy 05 FX

    User review

    Harimoto inner force layer ALC hit extra thickness. Used in the back and weighs 45.8g
    Compared to Tenergy 05, it is clearly softer than FX. It is very easy to handle because it flies where you aim.
    For that reason, the jump is modest, and in other words, it settles well, and the block is stable.
    The downward rotation is also soft and easy to bite into, so it is easy to hit and enters with an arc, but the ball tends to be shallow overall. It is easy to hit the meat, but the impression is that the rotation naturally takes place.
    In 05, I was able to make a mistake even in the block, but the FX was shallow, so it was only there. Still it bites more than ordinary rubber.
    I thought that it was a rubber for rallying that it was difficult to punch with a single blow.
    People who do not have a strong impact can use the fore. There was a ball with a certain power even with hand hitting.

    See original review

    2022/12/11
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    10
    Control
    10
    Hardness Soft
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • DIGNICS 05

    User review

    I printed it on the back side of a Japanese-style pen, Segna.
    Even ordinary blocks can naturally rotate and clog your opponent. The fore is Morist SP, so the difference between the balls in the block is amazing.
    The drive also rotates tremendously. However, it was for advanced players who could adjust it because the ball going to put in often went over.

    See original review

    2022/10/17
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket SEGNA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Booster SA

    User review

    I hit with Aqua Blade and Segna. Both are pens.
    It's sideways, so if you rub it, it will rotate, but it feels good to hit the meat (angle). Saab also takes rotation.
    If you hit a low ball with an image of 80% meat and 20% rubbing, it will be a stable and good ball.
    The knuckles don't come out naturally, so you have to put them out yourself.
    It also takes rotation and is easy to handle, so if there are people who are transitioning from the back software, I think that they will advance this rubber first.

    See original review

    2022/10/11
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket AQUA BLADE ROUND Ⅰ

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • GLAYZER09C

    User review

    Extra thick 44.2g inner force
    Compare with Glazer.
    It doesn't bounce more clearly than the Glaser, but I didn't feel the hardness.
    The place where it enters stably is the same as Glaser.
    The upper rotation is good because the ball weighs more than the glazer as much as you hit it hard.
    As for the downward rotation, the loop drive that rubs with the sheet like the glazer does not rotate as expected and is easily countered.
    So it is necessary to put it in thickly, but it was easier to put in than the glazer.
    Also, since the arc line comes out, it is easy to aim at the course.
    It felt good on the back too.

    See original review

    2023/04/09
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. 3
  3. 4
  4. 5
  5. 6
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. 10
  10. 11
  11. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!