NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Swat Power

  

  I compared it with TSP's SWAT and SWAT SPEED. I pasted Ventus extra on all fore.
  It is a racket different from the other two types. Compared to SPEED, the board is obviously harder and the repulsion is stronger, so the flight distance is longer. SPEED felt like hitting with the upper board, but this feels like hitting with the board surface.
  Those who have migrated from SWAT will find lifting techniques such as downward rotation difficult.
  The board bends, which is a characteristic of SWAT, and it takes a strong turn, and the feeling that the block fits in by absorbing the power is small, but it is a racket that can produce power by swinging firmly without losing to the match.
  Also, I think that it has more ball retention than SK7 with special materials and butterflies and can produce arcs.
  When combined with Ventus Extra, SWAT has a strong power, but POWER can be flipped on the surface and fly a sharp ball. The power was overwhelmingly different.
  I felt that it was a racket that answered the request that I could not grasp the feeling of spinning if it contained material, and that I wanted to put it on the table but wanted to put out power.

  See original review Hide original review

  TSPのSWAT、SWAT SPEEDと打ち比べしました。全てフォアにはヴェンタスエキストラを貼りました。
  他の2種とは異なるラケットです。SPEEDと比較しても明らかに板が硬く弾きが強いので飛距離でます。SPEEDは上板で打っている感じでしたがこれは板表面で打っている感じです。
  SWATから移行した人は対下回転などの持ち上げる技術が難しく感じると思います。
  SWATの特徴でもある板がしなって強い回転をかかかる、威力を吸収してブロックが収まるという感覚は小さいですが打ち合いにも負けず、しっかり振りぬいて威力を出せるラケットです。
  また、特殊素材入りやバタフライのSK7よりは玉持ちがあり弧線が出せると思います。
  ヴェンタスエキストラと合わせた時にグイッとしなって威力が乗るのがSWATですが、POWERは表面で弾いて鋭い球を飛ばせます。圧倒的に威力が違いました。
  素材入りだと回転をかける感覚が掴めない、台に収めたいけど威力を出したいといった要求に答えてくれるラケットだと感じました。

  2023/01/23

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） SUPER VENTUS

  Recommend rubber（Back） SUPER VENTUS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Tenergy 05 FX

  

  Harimoto inner force layer ALC hit extra thickness. Used in the back and weighs 45.8g
  Compared to Tenergy 05, it is clearly softer than FX. It is very easy to handle because it flies where you aim.
  For that reason, the jump is modest, and in other words, it settles well, and the block is stable.
  The downward rotation is also soft and easy to bite into, so it is easy to hit and enters with an arc, but the ball tends to be shallow overall. It is easy to hit the meat, but the impression is that the rotation naturally takes place.
  In 05, I was able to make a mistake even in the block, but the FX was shallow, so it was only there. Still it bites more than ordinary rubber.
  I thought that it was a rubber for rallying that it was difficult to punch with a single blow.
  People who do not have a strong impact can use the fore. There was a ball with a certain power even with hand hitting.

  See original review Hide original review

  張本インナーフォースレイヤALCで特厚を打ちました。バックで使用し重さは45.8g
  FXというだけあってテナジー05と比較すると明らかに柔らかいです。狙ったところに飛んでくれるのでとても扱いやすいです。
  その分飛びは控えめでよく言えばおさまりが良く、ブロックは安定します。
  対下回転も柔らかい分食い込ませやすいので打ちやすく弧線で入ってくれますが全体的に球は浅くなりがちです。ミート打ちもやりやすいですが回転は自然にかかってしまう印象です。
  05ではブロックでもミスを誘えましたが、FXは浅くなる分そこまででした。それでも普通のラバーよりかは食い込んできます。
  一撃で打ち抜くのが難しくラリーをするためのラバーだと思いました。
  インパクトのそこまで強くない人はフォアでも十分使えます。手打ちでもそれなりの威力の玉が出ていました。

  2022/12/11

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  BOOSTER JP

  

  I borrowed a friend's shake and shot it with a pen, so it's just for reference. Use thickness.
  A beautiful ball comes out quite close to the back soft.
  Compared to SA, the ball releases faster and flies, so I felt that if I used it as a pen surface, I had to match it with wood. Impression that it won't fit if you can't cover it.
  It feels good because a fast ball comes out when you hit it from above.
  However, knuckles do not come out even if compared with SA. The other party's net mistake can not be expected and will be returned normally.
  It's easier to put in, so it's less nasty, so I think it's more suitable for a shake bag than a pen.
  I think that it feels easy to handle if it is a transition from the back of the tension system.

  See original review Hide original review

  友人のを借りてシェークをペン持ちして打ったので参考程度。厚を使用。
  だいぶ裏ソフトに近くきれいな球が出ます。
  SAと比べ球離れが早く、飛ぶのでペン表として使うなら木材と合わせないといけないと感じました。結構被せないと収まってくれない印象。
  上から打つ分には早い球が出るのでいい感じです。
  ただ、SAと比較してもナックルは出ません。相手のネットミスは期待できず普通に返ってきます。
  こちらが入れやすくなった分いやらしさがなく返ってくるので、ペンよりもシェークのバック向きかな。
  テンション系裏からの移行なら扱いやすく感じると思います。

  2022/12/11

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Innerforce Layer ALC

  

  I used ST. Weight is 89g
  Because it is an inner, the tabletop fits in, and when you hit hard, the power of carbon comes out. Compared to the outer ALC, you can clearly feel the goodness of the ball, so the block has a very good sense of stability and is easy to match with any rubber.
  Also, it is easy to swing for the weight of the racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  STを使いました。重さは89g
  インナーなので台上は収まり、強く打ったときはカーボンの威力が出ます。アウターALCと比べると玉持ちの良さがはっきりと感じられるのでブロックの安定感がとても良くどんなラバーにも合わせやすいラケットです。
  また、ラケットの重さのわりに振りやすいです。

  2022/11/06

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Evolution MX-P

  Recommend rubber（Back） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  

  I used FL. weight is 85g
  The blade is larger than the inner force layer ALC, so it can be entered even if it misses. With the center of gravity closer to the tip, the power when swinging firmly increased, but I started to feel the weight of the racket.
  With the rubber stretched, the inner force ALC is 187g, while the Harimoto inner ALC is 181g, which is 6g lighter, but the inner force layer feels lighter and easier to swing when driving.
  I chose a light individual racket, but it seems to be tough if both sides are made in Germany. Is it stable to put a relatively light tenergy on at least one side?

  See original review Hide original review

  FLを使いました。重さは85g
  インナーフォースレイヤALCに比べブレードの大きくなったことで当たりそこなっても入るようになりました。重心が先端寄りになったことでしっかり振れたときの威力は増しましたがラケットの重さを感じるようになりました。
  ラバーを張った状態でインナーフォースALCは187gに対し張本インナーALCは181gで6g軽いのですがドライブ時はインナーフォースレイヤのほうが軽く感じ振りやすいです。
  軽い個体のラケットを選びましたがそれでも両面ドイツ製だと厳しそうです。少なくとも片面は比較的軽いテナジーを張るのが安定ですかね。

  2022/11/06

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 80

  Recommend rubber（Back） EVOLUTION EL-D

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. Next >
12. Last »