ゲンガー's profile

Gender | Male |
---|---|
Age | U30 |
Experience | 6〜10 years |
User review
-
-
-
I used ST. Weight is 89g
Because it is an inner, the tabletop fits in, and when you hit hard, the power of carbon comes out. Compared to the outer ALC, you can clearly feel the goodness of the ball, so the block has a very good sense of stability and is easy to match with any rubber.
Also, it is easy to swing for the weight of the racket.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber(Front) Evolution MX-P
Recommend rubber(Back) JEKYLL&HYDE V47.5
-
-
-
-
I used FL. weight is 85g
The blade is larger than the inner force layer ALC, so it can be entered even if it misses. With the center of gravity closer to the tip, the power when swinging firmly increased, but I started to feel the weight of the racket.
With the rubber stretched, the inner force ALC is 187g, while the Harimoto inner ALC is 181g, which is 6g lighter, but the inner force layer feels lighter and easier to swing when driving.
I chose a light individual racket, but it seems to be tough if both sides are made in Germany. Is it stable to put a relatively light tenergy on at least one side?Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 80
Recommend rubber(Back) EVOLUTION EL-D
-
-
-
-
Tomokazu Harimoto I hit 2.0 mm with the inner force ALC fore. Weight is 48.0g
My first impression was that it was stiff. The trajectory is straight and the speed is good. The ball is released quickly. I get the impression that it is more bouncy than the Tenergy 80 special thickness on the back, and the drive goes in quite deep.
It's a low and spinning drive, so if you hit it well, you can miss the block over, but you had to work harder than usual to hit it.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
-
-
-
-
43.7g with 2.0mm on MK7
It is a rubber that feels safe to hit because it is soft.
This was a feeling that also led to the Evolution MX-P.
However, compared to MX-P and Quantum X Pro, it is shallow and inferior in power.
I thought it would be better to use it in the back.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket MK7
-
-
-
-
I compared it with TSP's SWAT and SWAT SPEED. I pasted Ventus extra on all fore.
It is a racket different from the other two types. Compared to SPEED, the board is obviously harder and the repulsion is stronger, so the flight distance is longer. SPEED felt like hitting with the upper board, but this feels like hitting with the board surface.
Those who have migrated from SWAT will find lifting techniques such as downward rotation difficult.
The board bends, which is a characteristic of SWAT, and it takes a strong turn, and the feeling that the block fits in by absorbing the power is small, but it is a racket that can produce power by swinging firmly without losing to the match.
Also, I think that it has more ball retention than SK7 with special materials and butterflies and can produce arcs.
When combined with Ventus Extra, SWAT has a strong power, but POWER can be flipped on the surface and fly a sharp ball. The power was overwhelmingly different.
I felt that it was a racket that answered the request that I could not grasp the feeling of spinning if it contained material, and that I wanted to put it on the table but wanted to put out power.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber(Front) SUPER VENTUS
Recommend rubber(Back) SUPER VENTUS
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.