ゲンガー's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | 6〜10 years |
User review
-
-
-
2024/02/27
Put a 2.0mm sheet on a TSP SWAT, came out to 45.2g
Compared to the plain version, it held the ball better and gripped it with more spin, I felt.
Like the plain version, it produces clean shots.
My impression was like a slightly harder Rozena.
It spins more than the plain version, but it doesn't quite reach the level of the higher-end rubbers.
It's not too soft, so you can use it on both forehand and backhand, but with an all-wood blade it holds the ball too much, so I thought it worked best paired with a composite/carbon blade.
Like the plain version, this one also gave an overall unremarkable, well-rounded impression - a rubber that's neither great nor bad, about what you'd expect for the price.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Swat
-
-
-
-
2023/04/09
Mounted at 2.0mm on my MK7, it comes to 43.7g
It's a soft rubber, so it gives you a real sense of security when hitting.
This feel reminded me a bit of Evolution MX-P.
That said, compared to MX-P or Quantum X Pro, the ball inevitably feels shallower and it falls short in power.
I thought it works well on the backhand.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket MK7
-
-
-
-
2023/01/08
I played with the 1.9mm version on an Innerforce Layer. Weight was 46.1g.
On my backhand I had V47.5 attached, so this is a comparison against V47.5 (hereafter "V").
Compared to V, the pip spacing on the sheet is wider, and you can feel the softness of the sheet on contact.
The trajectory is lower than V. I was hitting so close to the net it made me a bit nervous.
The feel is different, but in terms of trajectory alone, think of V as Tenergy 80 and X as Tenergy 64.
Though I'm not totally sure why, X felt harder to me.
Against backspin, if you're just brushing with the sheet there's not much difference from V, but for hard hits V had better stability because it produces more arc.
Also, there wasn't really anything X could do that V couldn't, so I think it's better to just use the more stable V. My backhand tends to be more of a meet-hit style, and even so I couldn't really tell what was so great about X.
If anything, it might suit people looking for a flatter, more direct trajectory.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
2022/10/17
I put on 2.0mm on the forehand of an SWAT and an Innerforce Layer ALC. Weight with the Innerforce Layer ALC was 47.1g.
The arc is moderate and it has good speed too.
If you have solid impact, you can feel the sensation of gripping the ball and putting power onto it.
That said, it feels harder than V20. Given my own skill level, it suits forehand but is tough on backhand.
I think it's best used once you're able to hit solid drives.
Because of its hardness, I felt it pairs well with all-wood blades or inner-ply blades.
It especially pairs extremely well with the SWAT.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
2022/10/13
I played with the Japanese-style Segna.
Being a horizontal-grain rubber, it grips the ball completely differently from the vertical-grain Moristo SP and gets a lot of spin.
Overall the feel was somewhere between Booster SA and Impartial XS. It also felt like it held the ball a bit better than Rakza PO.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket SEGNA
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.
