NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  DNA PRO M

  

  I borrowed a friend's and hit it. The maximum thickness is applied to clipper wood.
  Since the seat is soft, it feels softer than the sponge hardness, and I thought it was more suitable for the back than the fore. Relatively straight trajectory, power is average and it is easy to hit meat.
  I may be using Tenergy 80 usually, but it doesn't fly as much as I thought.
  For that reason, there was a sense of security that it would fit when hitting straight.
  It feels just right in the back, and the block fits in, and it's easy to hit meat, so it feels good. However, if you rub it with a sheet, it will not fly away, so you need to let it bite in.
  The trajectory is Vega X, and the ease of handling is Vega Tour.

  See original review Hide original review

  友人のを借りて打ちました。クリッパーウッドに貼り厚さはMAX。
  シートが柔らかいのでスポンジ硬度よりも柔らかく感じフォアよりもバック向きだと思いました。割と直線的な弾道、威力は並でミート打ちもやりやすいです。
  普段テナジー80を使っているかもしれませんが思ったよりも飛ばないです。
  その分ストレートに打つ際に収まってくれる安心感はありました。
  バックではちょうどいい感じの硬さに感じブロックは収まる、ミート打ちはしやすいので好感触です。ただ、シートで擦る打ち方だと飛んでいかないので食い込ませる必要があります。
  弾道はヴェガX、扱いやすさはヴェガツアーといったイメージです。

  2022/12/11

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket CLIPPER WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Tenergy 05 FX

  

  Harimoto inner force layer ALC hit extra thickness. Used in the back and weighs 45.8g
  Compared to Tenergy 05, it is clearly softer than FX. It is very easy to handle because it flies where you aim.
  For that reason, the jump is modest, and in other words, it settles well, and the block is stable.
  The downward rotation is also soft and easy to bite into, so it is easy to hit and enters with an arc, but the ball tends to be shallow overall. It is easy to hit the meat, but the impression is that the rotation naturally takes place.
  In 05, I was able to make a mistake even in the block, but the FX was shallow, so it was only there. Still it bites more than ordinary rubber.
  I thought that it was a rubber for rallying that it was difficult to punch with a single blow.
  People who do not have a strong impact can use the fore. There was a ball with a certain power even with hand hitting.

  See original review Hide original review

  張本インナーフォースレイヤALCで特厚を打ちました。バックで使用し重さは45.8g
  FXというだけあってテナジー05と比較すると明らかに柔らかいです。狙ったところに飛んでくれるのでとても扱いやすいです。
  その分飛びは控えめでよく言えばおさまりが良く、ブロックは安定します。
  対下回転も柔らかい分食い込ませやすいので打ちやすく弧線で入ってくれますが全体的に球は浅くなりがちです。ミート打ちもやりやすいですが回転は自然にかかってしまう印象です。
  05ではブロックでもミスを誘えましたが、FXは浅くなる分そこまででした。それでも普通のラバーよりかは食い込んできます。
  一撃で打ち抜くのが難しくラリーをするためのラバーだと思いました。
  インパクトのそこまで強くない人はフォアでも十分使えます。手打ちでもそれなりの威力の玉が出ていました。

  2022/12/11

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  Tomokazu Harimoto Inner Force ALC's back hit a special thickness. Weight is 45.0g
  Anyway, the block fits and is stable. The ball is also fast, so you can prevent the opponent from hitting the drive continuously.
  However, I think that it is because of my hitting method, but the downward rotation hit falls. . .
  This is not the case at 80
  It can be used enough even for the fore. A fast drive with a straight trajectory like the Lazanta R48, but it fits on the table. Rather the fore was better.

  See original review Hide original review

  張本智和インナーフォースALCのバックで特厚を打ちました。重さは45.0g
  とにかくブロックが収まって安定します。球も早いので相手に連続でドライブ強打を打たせないことができます。
  ただ、自分の打ち方のせいだと思いますが下回転打ちが落ちる。。。
  80ではこんなことはないんですが
  フォアでも十分使えます。ラザンターR48のような直線的な弾道で早いドライブ、なのに台上も収まります。むしろフォアのほうが良かったです。

  2022/11/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  SWAT, I hit 2.0 mm on the fore of the inner force layer ALC. Weight is 47.1g with inner force layer ALC
  The arc line is moderate and speed comes out.
  If you have an impact, you can see the feeling of grabbing the ball and putting power on it.
  I just feel harder than V20. With my own ability, it is suitable for the fore and it is tough for the back.
  I think that it is better to use it after you can hit the drive firmly.
  I thought it would be better to match it with wood or inner because it has hardness.
  Especially compatibility with SWAT is outstandingly good.

  See original review Hide original review

  SWAT、インナーフォースレイヤALCのフォアに2.0㎜を打ちました。重さはインナーフォースレイヤALCで47.1g
  弧線はほどほどでスピードも出ます。
  インパクトがある人ならボールを掴んでパワーをのせている感覚がわかります。
  ただV20より硬さを感じます。自分の実力ではフォア向きでバックには厳しいです。
  しっかりドライブを打てるようになってから使うのが良いと思います。
  硬さがあるので木材かインナーに合わせるのがいいと思いました。
  特にSWATとの相性は抜群に良いです。

  2022/10/17

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Rakza PO

  

  I hit it with an aqua blade.
  Overall, there is no technique that is difficult to do, but there is only a sideways glance and knuckles do not come out that far. Compared to the back software, it is a knuckle, but you need to put out a knuckle that will make your opponent make a mistake.
  Receive can also be entered by hitting the back software.
  In terms of the amount of rotation when looking sideways
  Impercial XS > Rakuza PO ≒ Morist SP AX > Booster SA
  I think so.

  See original review Hide original review

  アクアブレードで打ちました。
  全体的にやりにくい技術はないですが横目だけありナックルはそこまで出ないです。裏ソフトと比べるとナックルにはなっていますが相手にミスをさせるようなナックルは自分から出す必要があります。
  レシーブは裏ソフトの打ち方でも入ります。
  横目での回転量でいえば
  インパーシャルXS＞ラクザPO≒モリストSP AX＞ブースターSA
  かなと思います。

  2022/10/13

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket AQUA BLADE ROUND Ⅰ

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. 10
12. Next >
13. Last »