ゲンガー's profile

ゲンガー's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
      Racket

      Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Developed with and used by Tomokazu HarimotoSimilar to Innerforce Layer ALC with moderate speed a...
    2. TENERGY 80
      Rubber (Front)

      TENERGY 80

      • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
    3. DNA PLATINUM H
      Rubber (Back)

      DNA PLATINUM H

User review

  • DIGNICS 05

    User review

    I printed it on the back side of a Japanese-style pen, Segna.
    Even ordinary blocks can naturally rotate and clog your opponent. The fore is Morist SP, so the difference between the balls in the block is amazing.
    The drive also rotates tremendously. However, it was for advanced players who could adjust it because the ball going to put in often went over.

    See original review

    2022/10/17
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket SEGNA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Booster SA

    User review

    I hit with Aqua Blade and Segna. Both are pens.
    It's sideways, so if you rub it, it will rotate, but it feels good to hit the meat (angle). Saab also takes rotation.
    If you hit a low ball with an image of 80% meat and 20% rubbing, it will be a stable and good ball.
    The knuckles don't come out naturally, so you have to put them out yourself.
    It also takes rotation and is easy to handle, so if there are people who are transitioning from the back software, I think that they will advance this rubber first.

    See original review

    2022/10/11
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket AQUA BLADE ROUND Ⅰ

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • GLAYZER09C

    User review

    Extra thick 44.2g inner force
    Compare with Glazer.
    It doesn't bounce more clearly than the Glaser, but I didn't feel the hardness.
    The place where it enters stably is the same as Glaser.
    The upper rotation is good because the ball weighs more than the glazer as much as you hit it hard.
    As for the downward rotation, the loop drive that rubs with the sheet like the glazer does not rotate as expected and is easily countered.
    So it is necessary to put it in thickly, but it was easier to put in than the glazer.
    Also, since the arc line comes out, it is easy to aim at the course.
    It felt good on the back too.

    See original review

    2023/04/09
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • MK7

    User review

    It was an individual of 92.2g. 193.7 g with rubber attached.
    At first, I used 2.1mm Evo MX-P and MX-S, but gave up because it was too heavy at 197.6g.
    Since the racket itself was heavy, it should have been a relatively light hybrid MK. Or Tamas rubber.
    I thought it would be hard with a ball, but when I hit it, it was a soft wood that made me feel like I was holding the ball. The shot feeling was a mushy impression, but the playing is also good. Also, the stability of the counter and block is excellent because it has good ball retention.
    It is easy to do the technology that uses the opponent's rotation well on the bench.
    Because it is made of wood and has good ball retention, it is difficult to hit with one blow and it is easy to rally.

    See original review

    2023/04/05
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Touch
    9
    Hardness Soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Quantum X PRO

    Recommend rubber(Back) HEXER POWERGRIP

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • MANTRA M

    User review

    47.3g with special thickness for corbel.
    It is an easy-to-handle rubber. It is easy to hit the downward rotation, and both loops and bangs are possible.
    It is an honor student rubber that is not bad at saying this. This feeling is the same as the DNA series.
    The difference from the DNA Pro was still power and rotation, and the speed was higher for the Pro. Also, the seat felt softer on the Pro M.

    See original review

    2023/02/09
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket KORBEL

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. 4
  3. 5
  4. 6
  5. 7
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. 11
  10. 12
  11. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!