ゲンガー's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
- Developed with and used by Tomokazu HarimotoSimilar to Innerforce Layer ALC with moderate speed a...
-
- Rubber (Front)
- • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
-
- Rubber (Back)
-
User review
-
-
-
2023/01/16
Inner force layer makes it extra thick. Weight is 46.6g.
Overall performance is one rank higher than DNA Pro.
The seat is soft, but the flight is just right.
Even when I rubbed with a sheet that I was worried about with DNA Pro, there was no problem here. There is also an amount of rotation, but it is not as much as Tenergy.
I felt that it was a versatile rubber that could be used for spinning and hitting meat.
I thought it was a rubber with no characteristics in a one-point trial, but in the oar format, it is easy to put in any ball. You can return it with a ball that does not hit a bang when you return it quickly. I felt that it is a rubber recommended for people who want to make a lot of mistakes and want a sense of stability because they can shoot the ball as they imagined.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
-
2024/04/18
It was an 89.2 model.
Although it is made of five plywood, it feels like the ball leaves the racket quicker than I expected and flies further.
However, the power still feels like that of a five-ply wood club.
I think it is more suitable for people who use special materials and want a more wood-like feel rather than people who want the feel of a five-ply wood club.
The grip is thin rather than narrow, with a deep jaw and a long distance from the handle to the blade.
I feel that this is a grip that will divide people's tastes, so if you're interested, I recommend you try holding it at least once.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber（Front） V>20 Double Extra
Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64
-
-
-
-
2024/04/18
It weighed 87.6g and with rubber attached it was 188.2g.
Compared to the Harimoto Inner ALC.
The grip is thinner than the Harimoto Inner and feels thinner when you hold it.
The feel of the ball is a little harder than the Harimoto Inner and the trajectory seems to be linear.
Also, because it's an inner, I feel the ball holds and it spins, but I felt that it was more like an outer among inners.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber（Front） NEO HURRICANE 3
Recommend rubber（Back） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
-
-
-
-
2024/02/27
48.4g with 2.0 pasted on TSP SWAT
I had the impression that it didn't feel too stiff and could fly fairly well.
I thought the seat was stronger because the downward rotation was higher than the Ventus Extra.
The ball is beautiful because it is made in Japan.
I thought it was a rubber suitable for the price, with an overall round image and not bad or bad.
However, I felt that there was no need to use spin because I felt more secure.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Swat
-
-
-
-
2024/02/27
45.2g with 2.0 pasted on TSP's SWAT
I had the impression that it held the ball better than the Muji and had better rotation.
A beautiful ball comes out just like the unbranded one.
The image is like a slightly hard Rosena.
It takes more rotation than Muji, but it is not as good as high-priced rubber.
It's not too soft, so it can be used both fore and back, but wood would hold the ball too much, so I thought it would be perfect to match it with a material-based racket.
Like MUJI, this rubber has an overall round image, and I thought it was a fair-to-good rubber that was suitable for the price.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Swat
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.
