ゲンガー's profile

ゲンガー's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
      Racket

      Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Developed with and used by Tomokazu HarimotoSimilar to Innerforce Layer ALC with moderate speed a...
    2. TENERGY 80
      Rubber (Front)

      TENERGY 80

      • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
    3. DNA PLATINUM H
      Rubber (Back)

      DNA PLATINUM H

User review

  • KORBEL

    User review

    Weight is 90.9g. It was 188.9g with the rubber attached. Purchased for trial hitting with a wood racket.
    It is easy to control because it has a surprisingly good ball retention.
    Although it is a product of another company, it feels much more durable than SWAT.
    When facing downwards, you can change the course after seeing the opponent's stance. Since it is 5 pieces, the jump is modest. It is easy to control and the flight is modest, so there are fewer mistakes.
    I think that it can be recommended for beginners / beginners, but the weight is the neck.

    See original review

    2023/01/21
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7

    Recommend rubber(Back) EVOLUTION EL-D

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • HADRAW5

    User review

    It was 75.5g. It's a racket that is way off the average, so just for reference.

    It felt like it went up higher than other wooden rackets, but I didn't feel like it held the ball very well.

    It felt a bit bouncy for a 5-ply wood racket, and while I can understand why the numbers in the catalog are the same as the Inner Force, it doesn't have as much power when you hit it hard.

    If you want a wood feel, I think it's better to use the Corbel, and if not, the Inner Force ALC.

    See original review

    2024/07/07
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    8
    Control
    7
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) V>20 Double Extra

    Recommend rubber(Back) V>20 Double Extra

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • REDMONKEY

    User review

    48.4g with 2.0 pasted on TSP SWAT
    I had the impression that it didn't feel too stiff and could fly fairly well.
    I thought the seat was stronger because the downward rotation was higher than the Ventus Extra.
    The ball is beautiful because it is made in Japan.
    I thought it was a rubber suitable for the price, with an overall round image and not bad or bad.
    However, I felt that there was no need to use spin because I felt more secure.

    See original review

    2024/02/27
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Swat

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • REDMONKEY Spin

    User review

    45.2g with 2.0 pasted on TSP's SWAT
    I had the impression that it held the ball better than the Muji and had better rotation.
    A beautiful ball comes out just like the unbranded one.
    The image is like a slightly hard Rosena.
    It takes more rotation than Muji, but it is not as good as high-priced rubber.
    It's not too soft, so it can be used both fore and back, but wood would hold the ball too much, so I thought it would be perfect to match it with a material-based racket.
    Like MUJI, this rubber has an overall round image, and I thought it was a fair-to-good rubber that was suitable for the price.

    See original review

    2024/02/27
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Swat

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • V>22 Double Extra

    User review

    49.6g with MAX attached to Fortino Performance
    I used it in the foreground.
    The ball is straight and clearly low.
    I started to feel more stable when I tried to roll the ball around a little bit, trying to spin it rather than hitting it thickly.
    It may be preferred by people who hit the ball with rotation.
    Also, although I could serve well, it was difficult to hit a downward rotation.
    It was a rubber with an image of Ventus Extra for pop-up and V15 for trajectory.

    See original review

    2023/09/24
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket FORTINO PERFORMANCE

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. 7
  3. 8
  4. 9
  5. 10
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. 14

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!