NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  MANTRA M

  

  Max thickness on a Korbel, 47.3g.
  It's an easy rubber to handle. It's easy to hit against backspin, and both looping and hard hitting are possible.
  There's really nothing it's bad at - it's a solid, well-rounded rubber. The feel is the same as the DNA series.
  The difference from DNA Pro is really the power - Pro had more spin and speed. Also, the Pro M sheet felt softer.

  See original review Hide original review

  コルベルに特厚で47.3g。
  扱いやすいラバーです。対下回転も打ちやすくループ、強打どちらも可能です。
  これと言って苦手なことはない優等生なラバーです。この感じはDNAシリーズと同じです。
  DNAプロとの違いはやはり威力で回転、スピードはプロの方が上でした。またシートはプロMの方が柔らかく感じました。

  2023/02/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket KORBEL

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  DNA PLATINUM M

  

  I hit with the max-thickness version on an Innerforce Layer blade. Weight was 46.6g.
  Overall it's a rank above DNA Pro in performance.
  The topsheet is on the softer side, but the way it flies is just right.
  With DNA Pro I was worried about brushing the ball with the sheet, but here that wasn't an issue. There's a good amount of spin, though not as much as Tenergy.
  I felt it's an all-around rubber that handles anything well, whether you're spinning the ball or hitting it flat.
  Testing it with just a single shot, I thought it might be a rubber without much character, but in an all-around drill format, it's easy to return pretty much any kind of ball. When you return something in a hurry, you can send back a ball that's hard for the opponent to smash. It gives you the ball you're picturing in your head, so I felt this is a rubber I'd recommend to people who make a lot of mistakes and want more consistency.

  See original review Hide original review

  インナーフォースレイヤで特厚を打ちました重さは46.6g
  DNAプロより全体的にワンランク上の性能を持っています。
  シートは柔らかめですが飛び方はちょうどいいです。
  DNAプロでは不安のあったシートで擦った場合もこちらでは問題なかったです。回転量もありますがテナジーほどではないです。
  回転かけても良しミート打ちも良しとなんでも万能にこなせるラバーだと感じました。
  1点の試打では特徴がないラバーかと思ったのですがオール形式ではとにかくどんな球に対しても入れやすいです。とっさ返した際に強打が打たれないくらいの球で返せます。自分のイメージ通りの球が出せるのでミスが多く安定感を出したい人に勧められるラバーだと感じました。

  2023/01/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  ROZENA

  

  I put it on an Innerforce Layer ALC / Kenta Matsudaira ALC and used it on the backhand. Thick, 44.1g.
  It's soft and easy to hit flat shots with. When hitting drives, I really felt the ball sink into the rubber. This comes down to preference, but I personally prefer a bit quicker ball release, so pairing it with an outer ALC blade felt just right. There's no technique that's hard to do with this rubber - overall it's easy to get the ball on the table.
  That said, for hitting against backspin, it was more stable to let the ball sink into the sponge rather than brushing with the sheet.

  See original review Hide original review

  インナーフォースレイヤALC、松平健太ALCに貼ってバックで打ちました。厚で44.1g
  柔らかくミートがしやすいです。ドライブを打つときはかなりボールがラバーにいるなと感じました。この辺は好みになるのですが自分はもう少し球離れが早いほうがよかったのでアウターのALCと合わせるとちょうどいい感じでした。その他の技術もやりにくいことはなくとりあえず入れることができるラバーです。
  ただ対下回転打ちはシートで擦るよりスポンジに食い込ませたほうが安定しました。

  2022/10/30

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  impartial XS

  

  I played with this on a Japanese-style Segno.
  The pips are horizontal and densely packed, and just looking at it, it seemed like it would grip the ball well - and it really does; it spins the ball a lot for short pips.
  Meeting the ball felt good too. No issues producing knuckle balls, as long as you go for them yourself.
  That said, this might just be down to my own technique, but when I tried lifting a low ball into an arc (roughly 80% meet, 20% brush), the grip on the ball was almost too good and I made mistakes. I had the same issue with the horizontal-pip Morristo SP AX. It didn't happen with Booster SA, though.

  See original review Hide original review

  日本式のセグナで打ちました。
  横目で粒が密集していて見るからに回転がかかりそうでした。実際その通りで表ソフトの中ではとても回転がかかります。
  ミート打ちもいい感じでした。ナックルは自分から出しに行けば出るので問題なし。
  ただ、これは自分の打ち方があってないだけだと思いますが低い球を弧線を出して打つ(8割ミート、2割擦るイメージ)ときは玉持ちがよすぎてミスが出ました。同じ現象は横目ではモリストSP AXでも発生しました。ブースターSAでは出なかったです。

  2022/10/12

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket SEGNA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Moristo SP

  

  I tried it with an Aqua Blade and a Segna, both penhold blades.
  Being vertical pips, flat (angle) hitting is outstanding with this one. Knuckle balls come out naturally too, so a plain block is enough to send the opponent's shot into the net.
  Brushing the ball does add spin, but it was more of a "not bad for vertical pips" amount.
  Against backspin, unless you keep the ball low when brushing or work the placement, you'll easily get countered. If you manage to turn it into a flat (angle) hit, it becomes a knuckle ball, and the opponent seemed to have a hard time handling that.

  See original review Hide original review

  アクアブレードとセグナで打ちました。両方ともペンです。
  縦目だけあってミート(角度)打ちは抜群にいいです。ナックルも自然に出てくれるので普通のブロックで相手の打球をネットにかけることができます。
  擦っても回転はかかるのですが縦目にしてはかかるなぁくらいでした。
  対下回転は擦っても低く入れるとかコースを工夫しないと簡単にカウンターされてしまいます。ミート(角度)打ちに持っていけたらナックルになるので相手は取りにくそうでした。

  2022/10/11

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket AQUA BLADE ROUND Ⅰ

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 6
4. 7
5. 8
6. 9
7. 10
8. 11
9. 12
10. 13
11. 14
12. Next >
13. Last »