NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  FRANZISKA Innerforce ZLC

  

  I used the FL89G.

  The basic blade structure is the same as the Inner Force Layer ZLC.

  The differences are the lighter average weight due to the use of slightly lower-density wood, and the thick grip, similar to the Ovtcharov.

  The racket itself doesn't have much bounce, but the ZLC allows you to make a difference in ball quality between light and hard hits, which is great.

  You can either hit the ball far or not, so you can not only keep it on the table, but also add drop to your drives.

  The blade is 5.7mm thick, giving it a slight flex. It's less likely to be overwhelmed by counters or blocks than the Acoustic Inner.

  It's prone to dropping or becoming a straight shot if you hit it with your hand or lose your balance, and it's difficult to control when hitting it hard, but
  it was such a good racket that I wish I had tried the ZLC sooner.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL89Gを使用しました。

  ブレードの基本構成はインナーフォースレイヤーZLCと同じです。相違点はグリップ位でしょうか。
  オフチャロフと同じ形状の厚めのグリップなので手の小さい方はご注意ください。

  インナーらしく手元に響く感覚はありますが、CNFやインナーALCより打球感はかなり硬いです。
  ただ、薄めの板厚と硬いZLCによってしなりの良さとパワーロスの少なさをいいバランスで両立してます。
  薄く当てても、強くぶつけても狙った出力のボールは出せますが、相応のインパクトやボールタッチは必要ですね。

  打感が硬すぎるので自分は断念しましたが、気になる方は一度試してみて下さい。

  2025/09/19

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs 66g before cutting and approximately 44g after cutting, making it quite lightweight.

  This rubber is still renowned as one of Tenergy's masterpiece series, and is considered the easiest to use, excluding FX.

  The sheet is quite soft even among its hardness range, but it doesn't feel like it's losing any power.

  It produces a straight trajectory, but also has good spin.

  It doesn't fly too far off the table, and I can even cut it myself with a push shot, so it feels very stable.

  The speed of the hit is particularly noteworthy. I can return the ball at high speed with little force. The back hit and back block felt great.

  Overall, I felt like the sheet could be a little harder, but considering the weight, I was satisfied with this product.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット前66G、カット後約44Gです。

  今なお最高傑作シリーズとして名高いテナジーで入門編とされているラバーです。
  05や80に比べてシートが格段に柔らかいので硬度以上の扱いやすさを感じますが、飛び出しがかなり早い点には注意が必要です。

  直線弾道で弧線は低めです。回転も掛けられますが、飛び出しが良いため思ったよりドライブは打ちにくいです。
  反面、ミート時には力を入れなくても抜群の鋭い打球が出せるラバーです。
  フォアよりブロックとミート安定目的でバック採用が安牌でしょうか。

  価格は相応に高いですが、性能と軽量さを兼ねた良いラバーです。
  ロゼナからの移行であれば80をお勧めしますが、こちらも一度お試しください。

  2025/09/04

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  RASANTER R48

  

  I used a 2.3mm UM rubber. It weighed 69g before cutting and about 48g after cutting.

  It has an ultra-straight trajectory with a very strong bounce. It also launches quite quickly.

  The sheet is strong, but rather than just being hard, I'd describe it as having an incredible bounce back after grabbing it for a moment.

  It's a bit insensitive, so if you pay attention to the force you use on the receive, it's manageable.

  What's particularly noteworthy is its strength against topspin. It was easier to drive, meet, block, and counter against topspin than any other rubber I've used before.
  It feels like it launches out before receiving the opponent's spin. However, you need to be careful, as hitting it too hard will send it flying forward.

  On the other hand, I'm a little unsure about hitting with underspin. The arc is low, and you need some spin to get it to work, so it might not be suitable for those who frequently use a rubbing loop.

  I mainly used it with my forehand this time, but its strength in meet and block makes it a better choice as a backhand rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.3mmUMを使用しました。カット前69G、カット後で約48Gです。

  直線弾道でかなり弾みます。シートは柔らかめで鈍感系でしょうか。
  前方向への飛び出しの良さと対上回転の強さが特徴のラバーです。
  ドライブラリーやカウンター、ミートも問題なくこなせますが、思ったより球が荒れません。
  どちらかと言えば日本製に近い綺麗な球筋で揃います。

  下回転打ちは低い弧線と球離れの早さから同硬度帯の中でも難しめです。
  台上もやや浮きやすいので少し気を使いますね。

  一番の難点は劣化速度の早さで、1～2週間でテンションが落ちていき特徴のスピードが無くなっていきます。
  元々シートが薄いこともありラバーとしても寿命も短めです。

  使い始めてからのラバーの劣化の早さが気になりますが、総じてみれば特色のある良いラバーです。

  2025/08/15

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Rakza X

  

  I used a 2.1mm rubber on the forehand side.

  This is a hard, heavy, and classic German rubber from a generation ago.

  The sheet is so strong that you can use your own power to bite into it and hit it to get the spin and speed.

  The high arc and spin when the impact is perfect is amazing, and you can clearly feel the quality of the shot.

  Rather than switching from X-soft to this one right away, it might be better to get used to it with the Rakza 7 first.

  I switched directly from X-soft, so I'm having a hard time...

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。

  硬く重い旧世代の王道ドイツラバーです。
  シートは硬めですが、飛び出しはあまり強くありません。
  スポンジも詰まっている感じで全体的に重さを感じますが、特徴としてとにかく上に上げやすいです。
  基本、フォアラバーですね。バックだと数値以上に硬さを感じて厳しいです。

  しっかり自分のパワーでラバーに噛ませたドライブを打てれば、高い弧線に重い球質の打球が出ます。
  反面、しっかり振れないと上りはするものの棒球気味になりやすいです。
  シートで擦る系の技術も若干やりにくさを感じます。噛ませる意識が必要ですね。

  最後に重量がドイツ系の例に漏れず重めです。使用したラバーは157×150サイズの接着層込みで51gでした。
  バック面やラケット本体での重量調整は必要かもしれません。

  2025/06/02

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  RIGAN

  

  Both the sheet and sponge are soft and insensitive.

  I think it's good for cultivating the feeling of hitting with forehand and backhand. Even if you hit it from below, it will lift up.

  Because the sheet is insensitive, you don't need to adjust the angle to receive it.

  On the other hand, the upper limit of rotation and speed is low and the trajectory is linear.

  If you start to feel that you can hit it stably with this rubber, but it often returns, or you can't hit it through, it's time to move on to the next rubber.
  In conclusion, if you are going to use it, the first one seems appropriate.

  See original review Hide original review

  1.8ミリを使用しました。

  シート・スポンジ共に柔らかくシート自体がかなり鈍感です。
  扱いやすさからスピンテンション入門として有名なラバーですね。

  シートが鈍いのでレシーブもしっかりと角度を合わせなくてもとりあえず入れることはできます。
  反面、回転・スピードの上限は低く弾道も直線的になります。
  このラバーでドライブが安定してきたけどよく返される、打ち抜けないと感じ始めたら次のラバーへの移行タイミングです。

  結論、使うなら最初の1枚目あたりが妥当でしょうか。

  2025/03/26

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	6
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 5
4. 6
5. 7
6. 8
7. 9