NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  I used the 2.1mm version. After cutting to size it averages around 45-47g, so it's lightweight.

  Even though it's about 18 years old now, it's a legendary rubber that still reigns as one of the top high-end options.
  Of course, plenty of rubbers with higher performance than Tenergy have come out since, but in terms of the balance between performance and weight, nothing has surpassed it yet.

  The sponge hardness is a slightly soft 46°, but the topsheet itself is quite hard.
  Its biggest feature is how easily it generates spin — enough that it basically invented the term "auto-spin feel."
  Compared to modern rubbers, the trajectory is admittedly straighter and the arc lower, but it's impressive how forgiving it is — the ball still carries decently whether you hit it thin or full.

  The unfortunate part is the short lifespan, but I think it's best to just accept that as the price you pay for the light weight.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。平均カット後で約45G～47G位で軽量です。

  約18年前のラバーながら、ハイエンドの一角として君臨している伝説のラバーです。
  勿論テナジーよりも高性能なラバーはこれまでに数多く出ましたが、性能と重量のバランスでは未だ超えるものがありません。

  スポンジ硬度は少し柔らかめの46°ですが、シートは結構硬めです。
  オート感という言葉を作ったほどの回転の掛けやすさが最大の特徴です。
  現代のラバーと比べると流石に直線的で弧線も低めですが、ぶつけても薄く当ててもそこそこ球が走る許容さは流石ですね。

  惜しむべくは寿命の短さですが、これは軽量さの代償と割り切って使うのがよさそうです。

  2025/10/05

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  FRANZISKA Innerforce ZLC

  

  I used the FL89G version.

  The basic blade construction is the same as the Innerforce Layer ZLC. The difference is really just the grip.
  It has the same thick grip shape as the Ovtcharov model, so if you have small hands, be careful.

  As you'd expect from an inner blade, you get that feedback in your hand, but the feel is quite a bit harder than CNF or Inner ALC.
  That said, thanks to the thinner blade and the stiff ZLC, it strikes a nice balance between good flex and low power loss.
  Whether you hit it lightly or hard, you can get the output you're aiming for, but it does require solid impact and good ball touch.

  The feel was too hard for me so I gave up on it, but if you're curious, give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL89Gを使用しました。

  ブレードの基本構成はインナーフォースレイヤーZLCと同じです。相違点はグリップ位でしょうか。
  オフチャロフと同じ形状の厚めのグリップなので手の小さい方はご注意ください。

  インナーらしく手元に響く感覚はありますが、CNFやインナーALCより打球感はかなり硬いです。
  ただ、薄めの板厚と硬いZLCによってしなりの良さとパワーロスの少なさをいいバランスで両立してます。
  薄く当てても、強くぶつけても狙った出力のボールは出せますが、相応のインパクトやボールタッチは必要ですね。

  打感が硬すぎるので自分は断念しましたが、気になる方は一度試してみて下さい。

  2025/09/19

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  RASANTER R48

  

  Used the 2.3mm Max thickness version. Before cutting it down it was 69g, after cutting it down to size about 48g.

  The trajectory is flat and it has quite a lot of bounce. I'd say the sheet is fairly soft.
  This rubber's defining traits are how well it launches the ball forward and its strength against topspin.
  Topspin rallies, counters, and flat hits are all no problem, but the shots come out cleaner than I expected.
  If anything, the ball trajectory is clean and consistent, closer to what you'd get from a Japanese-made rubber.

  Hitting against backspin is on the harder side for its hardness range, due to the low arc and how quickly the ball leaves the rubber.
  The short game also tends to float up a bit, so you need to be a little careful there.

  The biggest downside is how quickly it deteriorates — within one to two weeks the tension drops off and it loses the speed that makes it special.
  Since the sheet is thin to begin with, it doesn't last very long as a rubber either.

  The speed at which it wears down after you start using it is a concern, but overall it's a good rubber with real character.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.3mmUMを使用しました。カット前69G、カット後で約48Gです。

  直線弾道でかなり弾みます。シートは結構柔らかめでしょうか。
  前方向への飛び出しの良さと対上回転の強さが特徴のラバーです。
  ドライブラリーやカウンター、ミートも問題なくこなせますが、思ったより球が荒れません。
  どちらかと言えば日本製に近い綺麗な球筋で揃います。

  下回転打ちは低い弧線と球離れの早さから同硬度帯の中でも難しめです。
  台上もやや浮きやすいので少し気を使いますね。

  一番の難点は劣化速度の早さで、1～2週間でテンションが落ちていき特徴のスピードが無くなっていきます。
  元々シートが薄いこともありラバーとしても寿命も短めです。

  使い始めてからのラバーの劣化の早さが気になりますが、総じてみれば特色のある良いラバーです。

  2025/08/15

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Rakza X

  

  I used the 2.1mm version.

  This is a hard, heavy, classic old-school German rubber.
  The sheet is on the hard side, but the ball doesn't come off it especially fast.
  The sponge also feels dense, giving an overall sense of heaviness, but a key trait is that it's really easy to lift the ball upward.
  It's basically a forehand rubber. On the backhand it feels harder than the numbers suggest and is tough to use.

  If you can really drive your own power into the rubber and grip the ball, you get a high arc with a heavy-feeling shot.
  On the flip side, if you don't swing through properly, the ball still rises but tends to come out flat and straight.
  Brushing techniques with the sheet also feel a little harder to pull off. You need to be conscious of gripping the ball.

  Finally, true to German rubbers in general, it's on the heavy side. The sheet I used, at 157×150 size including the adhesive layer, came to 51g.
  You may need to adjust weight on the backhand side or the blade itself.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。

  硬く重い旧世代の王道ドイツラバーです。
  シートは硬めですが、飛び出しはあまり強くありません。
  スポンジも詰まっている感じで全体的に重さを感じますが、特徴としてとにかく上に上げやすいです。
  基本、フォアラバーですね。バックだと数値以上に硬さを感じて厳しいです。

  しっかり自分のパワーでラバーに噛ませたドライブを打てれば、高い弧線に重い球質の打球が出ます。
  反面、しっかり振れないと上りはするものの棒球気味になりやすいです。
  シートで擦る系の技術も若干やりにくさを感じます。噛ませる意識が必要ですね。

  最後に重量がドイツ系の例に漏れず重めです。使用したラバーは157×150サイズの接着層込みで51gでした。
  バック面やラケット本体での重量調整は必要かもしれません。

  2025/06/02

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  RIGAN

  

  I used the 1.8mm version.

  Both the sheet and sponge are soft, and the sheet itself is pretty insensitive.
  It's well known as a beginner-friendly "spin tension" rubber because it's so easy to handle.

  Because the sheet is insensitive, you can get receives in even without setting the angle very precisely.
  On the other hand, the ceiling on spin and speed is low, and the trajectory tends to be flat.
  Once your topspin drives with this rubber have become stable but keep getting returned, or you feel like you can't hit through your opponent, that's your cue to move on to the next rubber.

  In conclusion, if you're going to use this, it's probably best as your very first rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  1.8ミリを使用しました。

  シート・スポンジ共に柔らかくシート自体がかなり鈍感です。
  扱いやすさからスピンテンション入門として有名なラバーですね。

  シートが鈍いのでレシーブもしっかりと角度を合わせなくてもとりあえず入れることはできます。
  反面、回転・スピードの上限は低く弾道も直線的になります。
  このラバーでドライブが安定してきたけどよく返される、打ち抜けないと感じ始めたら次のラバーへの移行タイミングです。

  結論、使うなら最初の1枚目あたりが妥当でしょうか。

  2025/03/26

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	6
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 5
4. 6
5. 7
6. 8
7. 9