O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
- The Arylate Carbon fibers are located closer to the core than with non-layer blades, which leads ...
-
- Rubber (Front)
- TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...
-
- Rubber (Back)
- • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
-
User review
-
-
-
2025/04/14
I used the FL85G product.
It's an easy-to-handle carbon racket with a board thickness of 5.5mm and a supple feel.
I recommend it as an introduction to special materials for those who like the thick grips of the Inner Force series.
The biggest difference between this and the fiber-only series, which is also cited as an introduction to similar special materials, is that the feel of the ball changes significantly between light and strong hits.Personally, I like the fact that the base material is spruce instead of the usual Inner ALC, which shows the manufacturer's attention to detail.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
-
-
-
-
2025/03/26
Both the sheet and sponge are hard for a 45° club, and the sheet is quite insensitive.
The first thing I noticed when I hit it was that it popped out quite quickly.
Because of this, it's hard to spin it. It pops out before it bites into the sheet.
On the other hand, it seems good for hitting the ball, but it doesn't have much speed.
The only good thing about it is that the sheet is insensitive, making it easy to receive.
The manufacturer says that it's recommended as a second club, but I honestly don't recommend it.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Acoustic
-
-
-
-
2026/06/13
I used the extra-thick version. After cutting, it weighs approximately 51.5g.
The hardness is 7° higher than Tenergy 05, resulting in an intensely hard rubber.
Compared to Dig 05, the topsheet is softer, but the sponge is harder.
Due to its overwhelming hardness, light shots that don't reach the sponge and shots on the table barely bounce at all.
On the other hand, when the ball penetrates the sponge, it produces exceptional power, making it easy to create a clear contrast between strong and weak shots.
Compared to Dig 05, its distinguishing features are its straight trajectory and ability to handle flat hits.
However, it demands more physical strength and skill than Dig 05, so I think only power hitters with a perfected swing can handle it.
Personally, I feel there's little reason to use this rubber because the lightweight advantage of Tenergy is completely gone.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
-
2026/06/13
I tried out the UM. It's said to be about 52g after cutting.
The sheet itself hasn't changed from the R48, but the hardness has increased significantly, and you definitely feel the hardness.
This rubber requires a lot of impact power. I could tolerate it for forehand long balls, but it was too hard for backhand.
The speed and spin when hitting thickly are top-class.
However, as is the fate of thin-sheet rubbers, it's difficult to impart spin when hitting thinly.
This is more pronounced than with DNA Platinum, and it's more suited to players who hit aggressively with speed rather than loops.
Also, it's definitely less forgiving than the R48, and you have to be careful in topspin rallies and counters.
It feels like the sheet is somehow too thin or overpowered by the hardness of the sponge...
It's undoubtedly a good rubber with character, but I would recommend the R48 instead.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/06/01
I used the MAX version. The weight was 100.2g in the package, 70.3g before cutting, and approximately 49g after cutting.
I have the impression that the balance between the sheet strength and sponge hardness is better than the M version.
The softness of the sheet is particularly noticeable, making it easier to create a clear distinction between ball trajectory when lightly gripping the ball and when deeply digging it in.
The balls on the table, which tended to float with the M version, now settle better, and I feel it's become a much more well-rounded rubber.
The points of concern are the lack of ball extension and poor feel, which persist from the M version.
From the opponent's perspective, the balls seem significantly better than with the M version, but I don't really feel the difference.
The sponge feel is particularly subtle when hitting with a thicker stroke, and I suspect this won't improve even if the hardness is increased.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.