O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
-
- Rubber (Front)
-
- Rubber (Back)
-
User review
-
-
-
2026/06/13
I used the extra-thick version. After cutting, it weighs approximately 51.5g.
The hardness is 7° higher than Tenergy 05, resulting in an intensely hard rubber.
Compared to Dig 05, the topsheet is softer, but the sponge is harder.
Due to its overwhelming hardness, light shots that don't reach the sponge and shots on the table barely bounce at all.
On the other hand, when the ball penetrates the sponge, it produces exceptional power, making it easy to create a clear contrast between strong and weak shots.
Compared to Dig 05, its distinguishing features are its straight trajectory and ability to handle flat hits.
However, it demands more physical strength and skill than Dig 05, so I think only power hitters with a perfected swing can handle it.
Personally, I feel there's little reason to use this rubber because the lightweight advantage of Tenergy is completely gone.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
-
2026/06/13
I tried out the UM. It's said to be about 52g after cutting.
The sheet itself hasn't changed from the R48, but the hardness has increased significantly, and you definitely feel the hardness.
This rubber requires a lot of impact power. I could tolerate it for forehand long balls, but it was too hard for backhand.
The speed and spin when hitting thickly are top-class.
However, as is the fate of thin-sheet rubbers, it's difficult to impart spin when hitting thinly.
This is more pronounced than with DNA Platinum, and it's more suited to players who hit aggressively with speed rather than loops.
Also, it's definitely less forgiving than the R48, and you have to be careful in topspin rallies and counters.
It feels like the sheet is somehow too thin or overpowered by the hardness of the sponge...
It's undoubtedly a good rubber with character, but I would recommend the R48 instead.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/06/01
I used the MAX version. The weight was 100.2g in the package, 70.3g before cutting, and approximately 49g after cutting.
I have the impression that the balance between the sheet strength and sponge hardness is better than the M version.
The softness of the sheet is particularly noticeable, making it easier to create a clear distinction between ball trajectory when lightly gripping the ball and when deeply digging it in.
The balls on the table, which tended to float with the M version, now settle better, and I feel it's become a much more well-rounded rubber.
The points of concern are the lack of ball extension and poor feel, which persist from the M version.
From the opponent's perspective, the balls seem significantly better than with the M version, but I don't really feel the difference.
The sponge feel is particularly subtle when hitting with a thicker stroke, and I suspect this won't improve even if the hardness is increased.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/05/09
I used the extra-thick 44.3g version.
Personally, I rate this the highest among the Dignics series.
It's particularly well-suited for backhand shots, offering a low trajectory, soft yet highly resilient feel, and less over-sensitivity than the 05.
It's also more forgiving than the 05 in terms of hitting techniques, and just right—not as over-the-top as the 80.
The light weight is also a significant advantage; it's unusual for a high-end rubber to average around 45g.
It's not too hard and works well with a wide range of rubbers, from wood to outer layers, so I highly recommend giving it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/05/09
I used the MAX46.2G.
As an evolution of the promising new Swat Spin, it seems that not only the sponge hardness but also the sheet composition has changed.
The increased hardness allows it to withstand stronger impacts to some extent, and the sheet is also on the stronger side.
Its characteristics are stability and auto-feel. While it can generate spin, the upper limit is moderate, and it's difficult to generate much power.
The sponge quality is still somewhat questionable, so the ball can drop unexpectedly if hit too hard, which is a slight complaint, but considering the price, it's quite high performance.
Because there are many rival rubbers, I can't recommend it as highly as Swat Spin, but since it's inexpensive, it might be worth trying once.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket NEVES WOOD
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.