O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
-
- Rubber (Front)
-
- Rubber (Back)
-
User review
-
-
-
2026/06/13
I tried out the UM. It's said to be about 52g after cutting.
The sheet itself hasn't changed from the R48, but the hardness has increased significantly, and you definitely feel the hardness.
This rubber requires a lot of impact power. I could tolerate it for forehand long balls, but it was too hard for backhand.
The speed and spin when hitting thickly are top-class.
However, as is the fate of thin-sheet rubbers, it's difficult to impart spin when hitting thinly.
This is more pronounced than with DNA Platinum, and it's more suited to players who hit aggressively with speed rather than loops.
Also, it's definitely less forgiving than the R48, and you have to be careful in topspin rallies and counters.
It feels like the sheet is somehow too thin or overpowered by the hardness of the sponge...
It's undoubtedly a good rubber with character, but I would recommend the R48 instead.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/06/01
I used the MAX version. The weight was 100.2g in the package, 70.3g before cutting, and approximately 49g after cutting.
I have the impression that the balance between the sheet strength and sponge hardness is better than the M version.
The softness of the sheet is particularly noticeable, making it easier to create a clear distinction between ball trajectory when lightly gripping the ball and when deeply digging it in.
The balls on the table, which tended to float with the M version, now settle better, and I feel it's become a much more well-rounded rubber.
The points of concern are the lack of ball extension and poor feel, which persist from the M version.
From the opponent's perspective, the balls seem significantly better than with the M version, but I don't really feel the difference.
The sponge feel is particularly subtle when hitting with a thicker stroke, and I suspect this won't improve even if the hardness is increased.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/05/09
I used the extra-thick 44.3g version.
Personally, I rate this the highest among the Dignics series.
It's particularly well-suited for backhand shots, offering a low trajectory, soft yet highly resilient feel, and less over-sensitivity than the 05.
It's also more forgiving than the 05 in terms of hitting techniques, and just right—not as over-the-top as the 80.
The light weight is also a significant advantage; it's unusual for a high-end rubber to average around 45g.
It's not too hard and works well with a wide range of rubbers, from wood to outer layers, so I highly recommend giving it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/05/09
I tried out the MAX. It weighs approximately 52g after cutting.
The sponge doesn't feel as hard as its hardness rating suggests; the topsheet is on the softer side.
The ease of ball penetration and the insensitivity of the topsheet are consistent with the previous Jekyll & Hyde series, which is very impressive.
While the V47.5 had issues with distance and speed, this rubber completely overcomes those problems.
In particular, the speed is at a level I've never seen before, allowing me to blast the ball deep into my opponent's court.
Furthermore, it retains the spin power to produce high-trajectory, rapidly dropping balls and low-trajectory, short-dropping loops from a low stance.
The downsides are the extremely fast ball release and its very short lifespan. It feels like the ball penetrates for just a moment before flying off at incredible speed.
The racket I paired it with this time was the Revoludia CNF 84G, which is supposed to be a racket with excellent ball control, but this rubber surpasses even that in terms of ball launch.
Regarding its lifespan, the sheet starts to deteriorate after about a month, which is a minor drawback.
This is a high-end rubber, different from the Dig 05. I highly recommend you try it.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/05/09
I used the MAX46.2G.
As an evolution of the promising new Swat Spin, it seems that not only the sponge hardness but also the sheet composition has changed.
The increased hardness allows it to withstand stronger impacts to some extent, and the sheet is also on the stronger side.
Its characteristics are stability and auto-feel. While it can generate spin, the upper limit is moderate, and it's difficult to generate much power.
The sponge quality is still somewhat questionable, so the ball can drop unexpectedly if hit too hard, which is a slight complaint, but considering the price, it's quite high performance.
Because there are many rival rubbers, I can't recommend it as highly as Swat Spin, but since it's inexpensive, it might be worth trying once.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket NEVES WOOD
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.