O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
- The Arylate Carbon fibers are located closer to the core than with non-layer blades, which leads ...
-
- Rubber (Front)
- TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...
-
- Rubber (Back)
- • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
-
User review
-
-
-
2025/04/14
I test-hit the FL 85g version.
It's a thin-bladed carbon blade with nice flex and an all-wood feel.
I don't think the bounce itself is all that different from a 5-ply all-wood blade, but it feels a bit weaker than a 7-ply.
It's also quite easy to put spin on, and you lose less power compared to wood.
The one downside might be that the flex is so good that counters can get a little wild.The short game and serves feel solid too, so it's a blade I can recommend to beginners as well.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
-
-
-
-
2025/03/26
I used the 1.8mm version.
The sheet is on the harder side for a 45° rubber, the bounce is so-so, and the sheet is quite dull/unresponsive.
The upside is that the dullness of the sheet makes it easier to receive serves.
Even if you get the angle wrong on a push, as long as you don't let it drop, it kind of goes in somehow — maybe that's also because the bounce isn't that strong.The problem is spin-based techniques like the topspin drive — especially brushing up against backspin to loop it is harder compared to the Rigan or GTT.
If you brush it properly it does go in, but the ceiling on how much spin you can generate is pretty low, so as a step-up rubber its direction feels a bit off.If your goal is to develop the feel for putting spin on your topspin drive, honestly I'd recommend using a different rubber.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Acoustic
-
-
-
-
2026/06/13
I used max thickness. After cutting it down, it came to about 51.5g.
The hardness went up a full 7 degrees from Tenergy 05, making it a rubber with a really intense hardness.
Compared to Dignics 05, the sheet is softer but the sponge is harder.Maybe because of that overwhelming hardness, soft touches and short-game shots that don't reach the sponge barely bounce at all.
On the flip side, once you sink the ball all the way into the sponge, it delivers outstanding power, so it's easy to create a clear contrast between soft and hard shots.
Compared to Dignics 05, the trajectory is relatively flatter, and it can also handle flat-hitting shots — maybe that's the differentiating point.
That said, it demands even more physicality and skill than Dignics 05, so I think only power hitters with a fully developed swing can really use it.
Personally, the lightness that used to be a benefit of Tenergy is completely gone with this one, so I felt there wasn't much reason to go out of my way to use it.Also, I think pairing it with an inner ALC this time was a mistake.
Since you need extra impact to really bite into it, my CNF blade I already had might have been the better choice.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
-
2026/06/13
I test-hit the uncut version. After cutting, it's said to be about 52g.
The sheet itself is unchanged from R48, but the hardness has gone up significantly, and you can definitely feel it. It's a rubber that demands raw impact strength — for me it was tolerable only for long forehand shots, but on the backhand it was just too hard to handle.
For topspin-based techniques, the performance is still top-class, same as R48. It flies in a straight trajectory and reaches deep into the court.
The quirkiness when hitting against underspin really stands out, and with my skill level, insufficient impact led to a lot of noticeable knuckleballs and over-misses.It's undoubtedly a good rubber with real character, but personally I'd still recommend R48 over this.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/06/01
I used the MAX thickness. It was 100.2g in the package, 70.3g before cutting, and about 49g after cutting.
My impression is that the balance between sheet strength and sponge hardness is better than the M version.
Hitting against backspin is still just as easy as before, and it feels close to Dig 05 or Tenergy 05.
Personally, since it flies flatter than Dig 05, meet-shots are easier — that's probably the point that sets it apart.
While keeping the same ease of use, the short game, which used to float a bit with the M version, now settles down better too, and I felt it's become a rubber with much more well-rounded performance overall.From the opponent's side, the balls coming at them seem noticeably better than with the M version, but the shot power still feels somewhat middling among rubbers of the same hardness.
Since M and H feel the same in that regard, I get the sense that raising the hardness further wouldn't improve it either.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.