O3's profile

O3's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Innerforce Layer ALC
      Racket

      Innerforce Layer ALC

      The Arylate Carbon fibers are located closer to the core than with non-layer blades, which leads ...
    2. TENERGY 05
      Rubber (Front)

      TENERGY 05

      TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...
    3. TENERGY 80
      Rubber (Back)

      TENERGY 80

      • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...

User review

  • SWAT POWER SPIN

    User review

    I used the MAX46.2G.

    As an evolution of the promising new Swat Spin, it seems that not only the sponge hardness but also the sheet composition has changed.

    The increased hardness allows it to withstand stronger impacts to some extent, and the sheet is also on the stronger side.

    Its characteristics are stability and auto-feel. While it can generate spin, the upper limit is moderate, and it's difficult to generate much power.

    The sponge quality is still somewhat questionable, so the ball can drop unexpectedly if hit too hard, which is a slight complaint, but considering the price, it's quite high performance.

    Because there are many rival rubbers, I can't recommend it as highly as Swat Spin, but since it's inexpensive, it might be worth trying once.

    See original review

    2026/05/09
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    6
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket NEVES WOOD

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • SWATSPIN

    User review

    I used the MAX45.3G.

    This rubber is very easy to handle with its extremely soft sheet and sponge.

    It's inexpensive considering its performance, and it's been a while since I've found a rubber I can recommend right from the start.

    I usually use rubbers around 50°, so it naturally pales in comparison, but the sheet is surprisingly well-made.

    I was particularly impressed by how the ball doesn't drop easily with topspin. It seems better to hit with the sheet rather than just tapping the ball.

    Personally, I recommend this one over Rozena because I prefer the sheet.

    See original review

    2026/05/09
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    6
    Control
    9
    Hardness Soft

    Recomend racket NEVES WOOD

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • NEVES WOOD

    User review

    I used the FL89.8G. With extra-thick binding on both sides, the weight is 182.3G.

    The blade thickness is 6.5mm, which is standard for a 7-ply blade, but its distinguishing feature is that the grip is almost identical to that of a Viscaria.

    It's slightly thicker, but many enthusiasts appreciate that the grip doesn't move around during changes of direction and that it's easy to control the backhand face.

    It has sufficient bounce, but the poor feel and center of gravity are concerning.

    In particular, the center of gravity is quite far towards the tip, feeling as heavy as a 190G Innerforce ALC.

    It's clearly heavier than a 184G Revoludia.

    If you're looking for a 7-ply blade with a thicker grip, give this a try.

    See original review

    2026/05/09
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) SWAT POWER SPIN

    Recommend rubber(Back) SWATSPIN

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • DNA Hybrid H

    User review

    I used the MAX version. The weight, including the sheet, was 73.2g before cutting and approximately 50g after cutting.

    Among spin tension rubbers, it has incredibly strong grip performance, and I felt that its high arc and ease of applying spin were superior to the Dig 05.

    The feel of the ball is a high-pitched sound typical of a hard rubber, but surprisingly, it doesn't feel as hard as the sponge hardness suggests.

    The ball goes extremely high, so it rarely drops, but it doesn't go as far as you expect, so spin awareness and a forward swing are essential.

    Of all the rubbers I've used so far, the receive control and ease of serving are outstanding.

    These two points are similar to the Grazer 09C, and I felt it had a slightly tacky feel.

    After using it, I noticed a significant reduction in drive errors, and it's a good rubber that makes me want to try the XH version once I get used to it.

    See original review

    2026/04/18
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Vega Japan

    User review

    I used an extra-thick rubber. 63.9g before cutting, 47.6g after cutting.

    The sheet is a little strong and sensitive.

    As is often said, it pops out like Tenergy, but there's not much tension, so it's definitely a manual rubber.

    It feels a little susceptible to spin, so it takes some getting used to on counter and table shots.

    Its greatest feature is the arc it produces for the price.

    It produces enough arc to hit the ball you want, and it does spin.

    The only downside is that, like all German-made rubbers, it's a little heavy.

    See original review

    2026/02/14
    Overall
    6/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    6
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. 4
  3. 5
  4. 6
  5. 7
  6. 8
  7. 9

Top Players

Country

Style