NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  SWAT POWER SPIN

  

  I used the Max, 46.2g.

  As the evolution of the promising newcomer Swat Spin, it seems both the sponge hardness and the sheet construction have changed.
  With the increased hardness, it can withstand fairly strong impacts, and I'd say the sheet is also on the stronger side.

  Its defining traits are stability and an "auto" feel, while ball power and spin are just okay.
  The sponge quality is still a bit iffy, which is my one complaint — hit it too flat and the ball can suddenly drop — but for the price, the performance is more than solid.
  Honestly, it's a performance that's neither great nor bad...

  Since there are a lot of rival rubbers out there, I can't recommend it as strongly as Swat Spin, but it's cheap, so it might be worth trying once.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAX46.2Gを使用しました。

  期待の新星スワットスピンの進化系ということで、スポンジ硬度だけでなくシート構成も変わっているようです。
  硬度が上がったことである程度強いインパクトに耐えられる上、シートも強めな部類でしょうか。

  安定性とオート感が特徴で、球威や回転はまずまずといった所です。
  スポンジの質が微妙なのも変わってない為、当てすぎると不意に落ちたりする点がやや不満ですが、価格を考えれば十分高性能です。
  正直可もなく不可もなくと言った性能ですね・・・。

  ライバルとなるラバーが多いためスワットスピン程お勧めは出来ませんが、安いので一度試してみてもいいかもしれません。

  2026/05/09

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket NEVES WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  SWATSPIN

  

  I used the MAX version at 45.3g.

  It's an easy-to-use rubber with a very soft topsheet and sponge.
  Even before gluing it on, the sheet was already curling slightly from the strong tension, and the raised pips hint at a short lifespan,
  but for the performance, the price is cheap - it's been a while since a rubber this recommendable as a first choice came along.

  Unusually for a rubber of this hardness, the ball doesn't drop off easily against topspin.
  The sponge feels about what you'd expect for the price, so it seems better to grip the ball with the sheet rather than just meeting it flat.

  If you prioritize the sponge, Rozena; if you prioritize the sheet, this one, I'd say.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAX45.3Gを使用しました。

  非常に柔らかいシートとスポンジで扱いやすいラバーです。
  貼る前からシートが巻き気味な位のテンションの強さと浮き出た粒が寿命の短さを物語っておりますが、
  性能の割に価格も安く、久々に1枚目から推せるラバーが登場しました。

  この硬度のラバーでは珍しく、対上回転でボールが落ちにくいです。
  スポンジは値段相応と言った感じなので、当て気味に打つよりもシートで引っ掛けて打つ方がよさそうです。

  スポンジ重視ならロゼナ、シート重視ならこっちでしょうか。

  2026/05/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket NEVES WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  NEVES WOOD

  

  I used the FL, 89.8g. With max thickness rubber on both sides, it comes to 182.1g.

  The blade thickness is 6.5mm, which is standard for a 7-ply, but the standout feature is the grip, which is almost identical to the Viscaria's.
  It's a bit thick, but the grip face is flat so it doesn't wobble in your hand during quick direction changes, which makes it easy to bring the backhand face around.

  It has plenty of bounce, but personally I'm bothered by the feel and the balance point. The feel is close to the SK7, it has a cheap, wood-like sensation.
  The balance is quite head-heavy too, it felt about as heavy as a 190g Innerforce ALC. It's noticeably heavier than a 184g Revoldia.

  If you're after a 7-ply with a thicker grip it might be worth trying, but whether it's really worth the performance and value at over 10,000 yen retail is questionable.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL89.8Gを使用しました。両面特厚張りで182.1Gです。

  板厚は6.5mmと7枚の中では標準的ですが、グリップがほぼビスカリアなのが特徴です。
  やや太めですが、グリップ面が平たく切り返しの際にグリップが遊ばない、バックの面が出しやすいです。

  弾みも十分ありますが、個人的には打感の悪さと重心位置が気になります。打感はSK7に近しく、安っぽい木材感を感じますね。
  重心もかなり先端寄りで190GのインナーフォースALC並みの重さを感じました。184Gのレボルディアよりも明らかに重いですね。

  7枚合板で太めのグリップを求めている方は試してみてもいいかもしれませんが、定価1万円越えの性能や価値があるかというと微妙かもしれません。

  2026/05/09

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) SWAT POWER SPIN

  Recommend rubber(Back) SWATSPIN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  DNA Hybrid H

  

  I used the Max version. Including the sheet, it was 73.2g before cutting and about 50g after cutting.

  Even among spin-oriented tension rubbers, this has intense grip, and I felt the high arc and ease of generating spin were both better than Dignics 05.
  The feel also produces that high-pitched sound typical of a hard rubber, but surprisingly it doesn't feel as hard as the sponge hardness rating would suggest.

  Shots come out at a steep upward angle, so they almost never drop into the net, but the ball doesn't travel as far as you'd expect, so being conscious of spin and swinging forward is essential.

  Of all the rubbers I've used, this is by far the best in terms of receive handling and how easily you can put spin on serves.
  Those two points feel close to Glayzer 09C, which is the part that gave me a slightly-tacky impression.

  Since I started using it, my driving mistakes have visibly dropped, and it left me wanting to try the XH version once I get more used to it — a great rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを使用しました。シート込みでカット前73.2G、カット後で約50Gです。

  スピンテンションの中でも強烈なグリップ性能があり、高い弧線と回転の掛けやすさはディグ05よりも上だと感じました。
  打球感も硬めのラバーらしい高音が鳴るのですが、意外とスポンジ硬度程の硬さを感じません。

  打球は極端に上に出る為落ちることは殆どありませんが、思ってる以上に行かないので回転意識かつ前へのスイングが必須です。

  これまでに使用したラバーの中でもレシーブの操作性とサーブの切り易さがダントツです。
  この2点はグレイザー09Cに近しいものがあり、微粘着っぽいと感じた部分ですね。

  使用してからは目に見えてドライブのミスが減り、慣れたらXHも挑戦したいと思えるいいラバーでした。

  2026/04/18

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Vega Japan

  

  I used the max thickness version. Before cutting it was 63.9g, after cutting 48.5g.

  For a 45° hardness rubber, it flies pretty far, and I feel the sheet is slightly harder than the sponge hardness would suggest.
  The good points are that the sheet grip and how well the ball sinks into the sponge are both good, so you can go for both sheet shots and flat hits.
  Personally it feels like a proper evolution of Vega Europe.

  If you're going to use it, I'd assume it's as a 2nd rubber or later, but the sheet's sensitivity might be a bit of a hurdle for beginners.
  Also, since the weight is on the heavier side too, if you factor that in, it might be worth skipping straight to the G-1 thickness for the sake of manageability.

  For the price, getting to experience such a serious, proper feel might be the biggest advantage.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを使用しました。カット前63.9G、カット後48.5Gです。

  45°帯としては結構飛距離が出る上、スポンジ硬度よりも少しだけシートの硬さを感じます。
  良い点はシートの引っ掛かりとスポンジへの食い込みが良く、シート打ちと当て打ちどちらも行ける点ですね。
  個人的にはヴェガヨーロッパの正統進化系と言った感じです。

  使うとしたら2枚目以降想定ですが、シートの過敏さが初級者には少しネックでしょうか。
  また、重量も相応に重いのでそれらを見越した上なら、扱いやすさ考慮でG-1まで飛び級してもよさそうですね。

  価格の割には本格派の打感を味わえるのが最大のメリットかもしれません。

  2026/02/14

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 4
4. 5
5. 6
6. 7
7. 8
8. 9
9. Next >