O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
-
- Rubber (Front)
-
- Rubber (Back)
-
User review
-
-
-
2026/04/18
I used the MAX version. The weight, including the sheet, was 73.2g before cutting and approximately 50g after cutting.
Among spin tension rubbers, it has incredibly strong grip performance, and I felt that its high arc and ease of applying spin were superior to the Dig 05.
The feel of the ball is a high-pitched sound typical of a hard rubber, but surprisingly, it doesn't feel as hard as the sponge hardness suggests.
The ball goes extremely high, so it rarely drops, but it doesn't go as far as you expect, so spin awareness and a forward swing are essential.
Of all the rubbers I've used so far, the receive control and ease of serving are outstanding.
These two points are similar to the Grazer 09C, and I felt it had a slightly tacky feel.
After using it, I noticed a significant reduction in drive errors, and it's a good rubber that makes me want to try the XH version once I get used to it.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/02/14
I used an extra-thick rubber. 63.9g before cutting, 47.6g after cutting.
The sheet is a little strong and sensitive.
As is often said, it pops out like Tenergy, but there's not much tension, so it's definitely a manual rubber.
It feels a little susceptible to spin, so it takes some getting used to on counter and table shots.
Its greatest feature is the arc it produces for the price.
It produces enough arc to hit the ball you want, and it does spin.
The only downside is that, like all German-made rubbers, it's a little heavy.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
-
2025/10/05
I reused the 2.1mm rubber on my forehand. It weighed about 45g after cutting.
I previously used this rubber with a softer inner rubber, but the ball didn't travel as far as I expected, so I gave up on it.
This time, I used it again with the outer rubber, and it felt incomparably better than before.
To hit good shots with the 05, you need to make the ball dig in more than with the 64 or 80.
Because the sheet is harder, the ball spins high when it reaches the sponge, with a high trajectory, penetrating deep into the opponent's court.
Perhaps the stronger instantaneous impact to match the outer rubber paid off, or perhaps the harder racket improves the digging, but it's suddenly become much easier to use.
Another advantage is that it produces high-swinging shots with slightly less force than German-style rubbers. It's no wonder it's called an auto-style rubber.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2025/09/19
I used the FL89G.
The basic blade structure is the same as the Inner Force Layer ZLC.
The differences are the lighter average weight due to the use of slightly lower-density wood, and the thick grip, similar to the Ovtcharov.
The racket itself doesn't have much bounce, but the ZLC allows you to make a difference in ball quality between light and hard hits, which is great.
You can either hit the ball far or not, so you can not only keep it on the table, but also add drop to your drives.
The blade is 5.7mm thick, giving it a slight flex. It's less likely to be overwhelmed by counters or blocks than the Acoustic Inner.
It's prone to dropping or becoming a straight shot if you hit it with your hand or lose your balance, and it's difficult to control when hitting it hard, but
it was such a good racket that I wish I had tried the ZLC sooner.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Hard
Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 80
-
-
-
-
2025/09/04
I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs 66g before cutting and approximately 44g after cutting, making it quite lightweight.
This rubber is still renowned as one of Tenergy's masterpiece series, and is considered the easiest to use, excluding FX.
The sheet is quite soft even among its hardness range, but it doesn't feel like it's losing any power.
It produces a straight trajectory, but also has good spin.
It doesn't fly too far off the table, and I can even cut it myself with a push shot, so it feels very stable.
The speed of the hit is particularly noteworthy. I can return the ball at high speed with little force. The back hit and back block felt great.
Overall, I felt like the sheet could be a little harder, but considering the weight, I was satisfied with this product.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.