NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  I reused the 2.1mm rubber on my forehand. It weighed about 45g after cutting.

  I previously used this rubber with a softer inner rubber, but the ball didn't travel as far as I expected, so I gave up on it.

  This time, I used it again with the outer rubber, and it felt incomparably better than before.

  To hit good shots with the 05, you need to make the ball dig in more than with the 64 or 80.

  Because the sheet is harder, the ball spins high when it reaches the sponge, with a high trajectory, penetrating deep into the opponent's court.

  Perhaps the stronger instantaneous impact to match the outer rubber paid off, or perhaps the harder racket improves the digging, but it's suddenly become much easier to use.

  Another advantage is that it produces high-swinging shots with slightly less force than German-style rubbers. It's no wonder it's called an auto-style rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット後で約45Gです。

  シートは結構強め、スポンジは柔らかいですが押し返す力が強いです。
  噛ませると勝手に発射される感覚は元祖オート感と言った感じでしょうか。
  球離れは相応に早めで80や64より瞬間的なインパクトが要求されますが、テナジーの中でもしっかりと掛けた時の回転量は随一です。

  軽量且つオート感を持ったラバーが未だなく、オンリーワンの良さも維持し続けているのも凄まじい点です。
  好き嫌いは別として、このラバーが使えるようになれば一人前といっても過言ではないと思います。
  寿命に関しては割り切って使いましょう。

  2025/10/05

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  FRANZISKA Innerforce ZLC

  

  I used the FL89G.

  The basic blade structure is the same as the Inner Force Layer ZLC.

  The differences are the lighter average weight due to the use of slightly lower-density wood, and the thick grip, similar to the Ovtcharov.

  The racket itself doesn't have much bounce, but the ZLC allows you to make a difference in ball quality between light and hard hits, which is great.

  You can either hit the ball far or not, so you can not only keep it on the table, but also add drop to your drives.

  The blade is 5.7mm thick, giving it a slight flex. It's less likely to be overwhelmed by counters or blocks than the Acoustic Inner.

  It's prone to dropping or becoming a straight shot if you hit it with your hand or lose your balance, and it's difficult to control when hitting it hard, but
  it was such a good racket that I wish I had tried the ZLC sooner.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL89Gを使用しました。

  ブレードの基本構成はインナーフォースレイヤーZLCと同じです。
  相違点としてはやや密度の低めの木材を使用することでの平均重量の軽さと、オフチャロフと同じサイズの太く厚いグリップでしょうか。
  自分の場合は個体によって小指の引っ掛かりが悪かったので店頭確認必須のラケットと思われます。

  球持ちはインナーにしては少し早め、打球感は掴むけど相当硬いです。
  金属感が全面に出るので、合わない人はとことん合わない打球感ですね。
  打球の勢いを0～100まで自分で作れる点が最大の魅力です。
  軽打や台上の時は全く弾みませんが、少しでも厚く当てた時にはZLCが一気に顔を出して強烈に飛び出します。
  体感0～30位までと40以上で一気に飛び方が変わるので、打感の急激な落差によるコントロールの難しさは感じます。
  特に強打時はただ当てるだけではオーバーするのでしっかりと回転を掛けるイメージがないと収まりません。

  自分としてはALCよりは好きな部類ですが、思ったより飛距離が出ないのが意外でしたね。

  2025/09/19

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	6
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  TENERGY 80

  

  I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs about 46g after cutting.

  Its performance falls exactly between the 05 and 64.

  It has an excellent balance of bite, grip, and launch power.

  It has the straight trajectory and decently high arc characteristic of Tenergy, plus a sense of speed at impact that the 05 lacks.

  Unlike the 64, it can be paired with wood rackets as well as harder carbon rackets, making it a rubber with a fairly wide range of tolerances.

  I think it can be used for both forehand and backhand shots, but I liked that it felt better to hold the club than the 64 when used with a backhand shot.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット後で約46Gです。

  05のグリップ力と回転量、64の直線弾道と飛び出しの良さどちらの側面もあるラバーです。
  シートは強め、打球感があまり感じられない点は05に近いです。
  ただ、05よりは確実に噛みやすくなっており、05よりも直線的な軌道が持ち味です。
  フォア面では扱いやすくなった05、バック面だとより直線的に出てくれる05といった感想になりました。

  ラケットをあまり選ばないので、張るラバーに困ったらとりあえず選択肢に入れてもいいラバーだと思います。

  2025/09/19

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs 66g before cutting and approximately 44g after cutting, making it quite lightweight.

  This rubber is still renowned as one of Tenergy's masterpiece series, and is considered the easiest to use, excluding FX.

  The sheet is quite soft even among its hardness range, but it doesn't feel like it's losing any power.

  It produces a straight trajectory, but also has good spin.

  It doesn't fly too far off the table, and I can even cut it myself with a push shot, so it feels very stable.

  The speed of the hit is particularly noteworthy. I can return the ball at high speed with little force. The back hit and back block felt great.

  Overall, I felt like the sheet could be a little harder, but considering the weight, I was satisfied with this product.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット前66G、カット後約44Gです。

  今なお最高傑作シリーズとして名高いテナジーで入門編とされているラバーです。
  05や80に比べてシートが格段に柔らかいので硬度以上の扱いやすさを感じます。

  直線弾道で弧線は低めです。回転も掛かりますが、打球は浅めで球筋が綺麗です。
  柔らかい分、他のテナジー系より台上処理が浮きやすい点には注意です。

  価格は相応に高いですが、性能と軽量さを兼ねた良いラバーです。
  特に重量に拘りつつ性能もロゼナ以上シートの強さが欲しい方へお勧めします。

  2025/09/04

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  RASANTER R48

  

  I used a 2.3mm UM rubber. It weighed 69g before cutting and about 48g after cutting.

  It has an ultra-straight trajectory with a very strong bounce. It also launches quite quickly.

  The sheet is strong, but rather than just being hard, I'd describe it as having an incredible bounce back after grabbing it for a moment.

  It's a bit insensitive, so if you pay attention to the force you use on the receive, it's manageable.

  What's particularly noteworthy is its strength against topspin. It was easier to drive, meet, block, and counter against topspin than any other rubber I've used before.
  It feels like it launches out before receiving the opponent's spin. However, you need to be careful, as hitting it too hard will send it flying forward.

  On the other hand, I'm a little unsure about hitting with underspin. The arc is low, and you need some spin to get it to work, so it might not be suitable for those who frequently use a rubbing loop.

  I mainly used it with my forehand this time, but its strength in meet and block makes it a better choice as a backhand rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.3mmUMを使用しました。カット前69G、カット後で約48Gです。

  超直線弾道で弾みます。飛び出しもかなり早めです。
  シートはテンションがかなり強めですが比較的柔らかいです。その分台上はかなり浮きやすいので力加減と角度に注意が必要です。
  フリック等も入れるだけにしないとすっ飛んできます。

  特筆すべきは上回転への強さですね。対上回転ドライブ・中陣ミート・ブロック・カウンターは文句なしです。
  比較的しなりの良いラケットで使いましたが、相手の回転を受けきる前に飛んでくれる感じでしょうか。押し負ける感覚はありませんでした。
  下回転打ちは逆に少し不安が残ります。弧線が低く、厚く当てすぎるとループでも飛びます。

  最後に寿命ですが、結構短めです。駄目になると弾みが落ちてくるので分かりやすいラバーです。練習合計18時間ほどで弾みが落ちてきました。

  今回はフォアメインで打ちましたが、バックでのミートとブロックが深く刺さる弾道でとても良かったので、バックラバーとしての方がオススメでしょうか。

  2025/08/15

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. Next >