NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Acoustic

  

  I used the 86g FL.
  When I picked table tennis back up as a working adult, this was the first blade I bought.

  The bounce is standard for the 5-ply class, and at a thin 5.5mm blade thickness, spin is quite easy to generate.
  A heavy, substantial feel combined with a sweet spot that's remarkably wide for a wood blade — that's its one-of-a-kind strength.
  I feel it's worth buying just to experience that alone.

  If I had to point out a drawback, it'd be that, to make up for power plus because of the grip shape, the balance is top-heavy. You might feel more weight than the actual spec number suggests.
  The grip shape is also quite unique — an almost-straight, extremely thin flared grip with a fairly wide flange.
  Depending on the person, adjustments beyond shaving the flange, like grip tape, may be needed.

  Obviously I'd recommend it for beginners, but it's such a masterpiece that plenty of seasoned players love it too.
  If you can accept the price, this is a blade worth trying at least once.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL86Gを使用しました。
  社会人になってから卓球再開した時、最初にこれを購入しました。

  弾みは標準的な5枚合板クラスで板厚も5.5ミリと薄く回転はかなり掛けやすい部類です。
  重厚感のある打球感と木材にしては破格のスイートスポットの広さ特徴で、唯一無二の長所です。
  これを体感する為だけに購入を考えてもいいレベルだと感じます。

  難点を挙げるとすれば、威力を補うため+グリップ形状により先端重心です。実数値以上の重さを感じるかもしれません。
  グリップ形状もかなり独特で、ほぼストレートに近い極細フレアグリップに幅がかなり広いエラが出ております。
  人によってはエラの削り以外にもグリップテープ等での調整は必要と思われます。

  初心者は勿論オススメですが、熟練者にも愛好家が多いほどの名品です。
  価格を許容できるなら一度は使ってみて欲しいラケットですね。

  2024/10/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7

  Recommend rubber(Back) Tenergy 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  DIGNICS 64

  

  I used the max thickness. It's 44.3G after cutting.

  This is the top-tier rubber in the 64 series, and its selling points are ease of use and light weight.
  The pips have wide spacing and lean over easily, so it feels quite a bit softer than the sponge hardness would suggest.
  On top of that it has great back-hand suitability, a low trajectory, a soft yet high-rebound feel, and it doesn't pick up too much unwanted spin.
  The counter-hitting technique also has less quirkiness than the 05, and for speed shots it's one of the top rubbers in the Dignics line.
  That said, because the pips lean over so easily, it doesn't get much distance. If you rally from mid-distance or further back, I'd recommend the 05 instead.

  The light weight is also a big advantage — it's rare for a high-end rubber to average around 45G.
  It's not too hard and pairs well with everything from wood blades to outer-fiber blades, so definitely give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚を使用しました。カット後で44.3Gです。

  64系の最上位ラバーであり、扱いやすさと軽量さが売りです。
  シートの粒間隔が広く倒れやすいので、スポンジ硬度よりもかなり柔らかく感じると思います。
  取り分けバック適正が高く、低弾道、柔らかく高反発、適度に回転を貰わない無いなどが挙げられます。
  ミート系の技術も05より癖が無く、スピードボールはディグ系の中でもトップクラスです。
  ただ、粒が倒れやすい為、あまり飛距離は出ません。中陣以降で打ちあう方には05の方をオススメします。

  重量の軽さもかなりのメリットで、ハイエンド級では珍しく平均45G付近です。
  硬すぎず木材からアウターまで幅広く合わせられるラバーなので、是非一度お試しください。

  2026/05/09

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  JEKYLL＆HYDE Z52.5

  

  I test-hit the MAX version. After cutting, it's supposedly about 52g.

  It doesn't feel as hard as the sponge hardness rating suggests - the topsheet is actually on the softer side.
  How easily the ball sinks in and the topsheet's insensitivity to spin both carry over from the previous Dignics, which left a very good impression.

  The V47.5 had issues with distance and speed, but this rubber overcomes those.
  Speed in particular is at a level I'd call the best I've ever experienced - you can send the ball roaring deep into the opponent's court.
  The spin is more than satisfactory too, letting you easily hit loops good enough to induce block errors.

  The downsides are the extremely quick ball release and a fairly short lifespan.
  The blade I paired it with this time was an 84g Revoldia CNF, which should have really good ball-holding characteristics, but this rubber's launch outpaces even that.
  Also, regarding lifespan, this might just be individual variation, but the topsheet went bad after a month.
  It's definitely a good rubber, but the fact that supply is limited and it's often out of stock is a downside.

  I've written a lot, but in conclusion, I think this is a rubber that fits the high-end category in a different way from Dignics 05.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを試打しました。カット後で約52Gとの事です。

  スポンジ硬度程の硬さを感じず、シートは寧ろ少し柔らかい部類です。
  食い込み易さ、シートの鈍感さ、この辺は従来のジキハイを踏襲しており非常に好印象です。

  V47.5では飛距離とスピードに難がありましたが、こちらはそれらを克服したラバーです。
  特にスピードは過去一と言っていいレベルの弾速で、相手のコート深くに唸るようにぶち込めます。
  回転量も申し分なくブロックミスを誘えるレベルのループが楽に打てます。

  難点としては極限的な球離れの早さと、寿命がかなり短命な事です。
  今回合わせたラケットがレボルディアCNFの84G品でかなり球持ちがよいラケットのはずですが、それを凌駕する飛び出し方です。
  また、寿命に関しても個体差かもしれませんが、一ヶ月でシートが駄目になりましたね。
  間違いなくいいラバーなのですが、流通量が少なく欠品が多いのもネックです。

  色々と書きましたが、結論ディグ05とはまた違ったハイエンドに相応しいラバーと思います。

  2026/05/09

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Innerforce Layer ALC

  

  I used the FL 88.1g version. With max thickness rubber on both sides it comes to 183.4g.

  I gave up on this blade a year ago, but I bought it again to give it another try.
  This time I could finally feel the performance that matches its reputation as an inner-ply blade that suits everyone.

  The speed isn't that strong, and it has a nice settled feel where the ball doesn't fly too far even when you hit it hard.
  The feel has a solid wood sensation - might be individual variation, but on light shots it actually felt softer than the Harimoto ALC.
  When you hit hard, you get that metallic ALC-like feedback, so it's easy to tell a good hit from a bad one.

  Thanks to the thickness of the blade, blocks don't get pushed back, and the short game has that ease typical of inner-ply blades - technically there aren't many weak points.
  Overall it's a well-balanced blade, about 70 points in every category.

  The grip is narrow but thick. The later Harimoto-series blades have slightly thinner grips, so pick whichever fits your hand.
  I think beginners would find it quite hard to handle, so this is probably more of a 2nd or 3rd blade.
  It's good enough that you could make it your main blade - a real masterpiece.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL88.1Gを使用しました。両面特厚張りで183.4Gです。

  1年前に使用して断念したラケットでしたが、再購入してリトライです。
  ようやく万人受けするインナーラケットの触れ込みに見合う性能を実感できました。

  弾みはそこまで強くなく、ぶつけても飛び過ぎない収まりの良さがあります。
  打球感は木材の感触がしっかりとあり個体差かもしれませんが、軽打時には張本ALCよりも打球感は柔らかかったです。
  強打するとALCらしい打ちごたえのある金属感が出るため打球の良し悪しも分かりやすいです。

  板厚がある分ブロックは押し負けず、台上もインナー特有のやり易さがあり、技術的に苦手な箇所が出にくい印象です。
  とにかく全ての性能面において70点位のバランス型なラケットです。

  グリップは幅は細めですが、分厚いです。後発の張本系の方がやや薄めのグリップなので手合うものをお選びください。
  初心者が扱うにはかなり硬く感じると思うので、ラケットとしては2～3本目辺りが想定でしょうか。
  メインラケットに据えてもいいと思う位の名作ですね。

  2026/01/25

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  

  I used the FL, blade weight 88.8g. With max-thickness rubber on both sides, total weight is 184.8g.

  This racket is based on the Innerforce Layer ALC, but with the head enlarged to 158x152mm.
  With the bigger head, there are several advantages over the original: an expanded sweet spot, a softer feel compared to the ALC's usual hardness, and a power boost thanks to increased centrifugal force.
  The grip is also made slightly thinner compared to the standard inner ALC, so players with smaller hands can hold it comfortably too.

  The biggest drawback is that the bigger head makes the total weight heavier, and with the balance point shifted toward the tip, it feels even heavier.
  This is something you can overcome with physical strength, but be aware that switching over from a normal-sized blade puts quite a bit of strain on your wrist at first.

  As for my impressions, the feel on contact felt harder than the Innerforce ALC or the Revoldia CNF. Maybe that's just unit-to-unit variation.
  It also flexes less than I expected, and personally I rate highly the fact that it doesn't grip the ball too much.
  Blocking and the short game in particular benefited from its inherently lower bounce and bigger head, giving it excellent control.

  If you're a younger player relying on physical strength, I think this is an excellent choice.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL88.8Gを使用しました。特厚両面張りで184.8Gです。

  インナーフォースレイヤーALCをベースに面が158X152サイズになったラケットです。
  面が広くなったことでスイートスポットの拡大、ALCの硬い打球感の軽減、遠心力を生かしての威力UPと従来品よりもメリットが幾つかあります。
  また、グリップも従来のインナーALCに比べ僅かに薄く作られており手の小さいプレイヤーでも握れます。

  最大の難点は面拡大で総重量が重くなった上に先端重心でより重さを感じる点ですね。
  フィジカルで解決できる問題ではありますが、通常サイズからの移行当初は結構手首に負荷がきますのでご注意ください。

  所見ですが、インナーフォースALC、レボルディアCNFよりも打球感は硬めに感じました。個体差でしょうか。
  しなりも思ったより少なく、球を持ち過ぎないのは個人的に高評価です。
  特にブロックや台上は元来の弾みの少なさや面の大きさが生きて非常に収まりが良かったです。

  若い年代のプレイヤーがフィジカルありきで使うなら非常に良い選択肢だと思います。

  2026/01/12

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. Next >