O3's profile

O3's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years

User review

  • BYPE

    User review

    Both the sheet and sponge are hard for a 45° club, and the sheet is quite insensitive.

    The first thing I noticed when I hit it was that it popped out quite quickly.

    Because of this, it's hard to spin it. It pops out before it bites into the sheet.

    On the other hand, it seems good for hitting the ball, but it doesn't have much speed.

    The only good thing about it is that the sheet is insensitive, making it easy to receive.

    The manufacturer says that it's recommended as a second club, but I honestly don't recommend it.

    See original review

    2025/03/26
    Overall
    5/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    4
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Acoustic

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Vega Japan

    User review

    I used an extra-thick rubber. 63.9g before cutting, 47.6g after cutting.

    The sheet is a little strong and sensitive.

    As is often said, it pops out like Tenergy, but there's not much tension, so it's definitely a manual rubber.

    It feels a little susceptible to spin, so it takes some getting used to on counter and table shots.

    Its greatest feature is the arc it produces for the price.

    It produces enough arc to hit the ball you want, and it does spin.

    The only downside is that, like all German-made rubbers, it's a little heavy.

    See original review

    2026/02/14
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    6
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • LIBERTA SOLID Pro

    User review

    I used the FL85G.

    This is an Inner Fiber racket made with Izanas.

    It has decent bounce, even for an Inner Fiber racket, and the ball flies out better than I expected.

    The feel of the ball resonates well in the hand, almost the same as a five-ply paulownia wood racket.

    Compared to the ZX Gear F, which is in the same category, this racket feels more focused on contact than spin.

    Thanks to its 6.0mm thickness, it doesn't flex too much, providing a high level of stability when contacting and blocking the ball.

    That said, it's not difficult to apply spin, and the exquisite balance is addictive.

    The grip is slightly thicker than Inner Force rackets, but there were some small differences that made it difficult to fit.

    The diagonally cut part at the base of the grip where the thumb rests is shorter than on Butterfly rackets, which tends to result in a slightly deeper grip.

    This can cause the surface to crumble, so I had to sand the grip for the first time. Please keep this in mind.

    If the grip fits your hand, this racket is a better choice than buying an inner carbon one.
    Please come and try it out in store.

    See original review

    2025/11/01
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) ROZENA

    Recommend rubber(Back) ROZENA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • TENERGY 05

    User review

    I reused the 2.1mm rubber on my forehand. It weighed about 45g after cutting.

    I previously used this rubber with a softer inner rubber, but the ball didn't travel as far as I expected, so I gave up on it.

    This time, I used it again with the outer rubber, and it felt incomparably better than before.

    To hit good shots with the 05, you need to make the ball dig in more than with the 64 or 80.

    Because the sheet is harder, the ball spins high when it reaches the sponge, with a high trajectory, penetrating deep into the opponent's court.

    Perhaps the stronger instantaneous impact to match the outer rubber paid off, or perhaps the harder racket improves the digging, but it's suddenly become much easier to use.

    Another advantage is that it produces high-swinging shots with slightly less force than German-style rubbers. It's no wonder it's called an auto-style rubber.

    See original review

    2025/10/05
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • FRANZISKA Innerforce ZLC

    User review

    I used the FL89G.

    The basic blade structure is the same as the Inner Force Layer ZLC.

    The differences are the lighter average weight due to the use of slightly lower-density wood, and the thick grip, similar to the Ovtcharov.

    The racket itself doesn't have much bounce, but the ZLC allows you to make a difference in ball quality between light and hard hits, which is great.

    You can either hit the ball far or not, so you can not only keep it on the table, but also add drop to your drives.

    The blade is 5.7mm thick, giving it a slight flex. It's less likely to be overwhelmed by counters or blocks than the Acoustic Inner.

    It's prone to dropping or becoming a straight shot if you hit it with your hand or lose your balance, and it's difficult to control when hitting it hard, but
    it was such a good racket that I wish I had tried the ZLC sooner.

    See original review

    2025/09/19
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    7
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL&HYDE V47.5

    Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Top Players

Country

Style