NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  HYBRID MK

  

  I used MAX thickness. Weight was about 71g before cutting and about 47g after cutting.

  The sheet has fairly low, small pimples, and doesn't feel like it has much tension in it.
  The sponge also has small, fine cells throughout, giving it an overall mochi-like, soft feel.
  Among German rubbers, I'd say it's on the lighter side.

  The main characteristics are that the ball flies upward quite easily, and it sinks in more than the listed hardness would suggest.
  It sinks in easily, but even with a flat-ish hit I never got the impression the ball would drop, and I liked that it doesn't demand any particular swing style.
  That said, be careful — it produces almost no distance or speed, and the ball tends to land shallow with a fairly high arc.

  It's a rubber with a somewhat different character from similar-hardness rubbers like the R48 or V47.5.
  I'd recommend pairing it with a slightly harder inner or outer blade.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを使用しました。カット前約71G、カット後約47Gです。

  シートは粒形状が低めでテンションがあまり掛かってないような感じです。
  スポンジも気泡が大きくないタイプで全体的にもっちりした感触です。
  ドイツ系の中では割と軽量な部類かと思われます。

  特徴としては打球が上にかなり上がりやすいのと硬度以上に食い込み易い点でしょうか。
  食い込み易いのですが、当て気味でもボールが落ちる印象はなくスイングの型を選ばないのは好感触です。
  ただし、飛距離とスピードは全く出ないのとボールが高めの弧線で浅く揃うので注意が必要です。

  近い硬度のR48やV47.5とはまた一味違ったラバーです。
  合わせるラケットは少し硬めのインナーかアウターをお勧めします。

  2025/11/29

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  TENERGY 80

  

  I used the 2.1mm thickness. After cutting, it was about 46g.

  It's a middle-ground rubber with characteristics of both the 05 and the 64.
  The points that set it apart would be the ease of use from being softer than the 05, and the flatter, 64-like trajectory.
  It also seems like a top candidate for people moving on from Rozena, since the pip shape is similar.

  Personally, I feel like it holds the ball longer than the 64, and the flat trajectory is appealing, so I'd recommend it as a backhand rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット後で約46Gです。

  05、64どちらの側面もある中間的なラバーです。
  05より柔らかい分の扱いやすさと64チックな直線軌道が差別化のポイントでしょうか。
  また、粒形状が近いロゼナからの移行先としても第一候補になるかと思われます。

  個人的には64より持つ感覚があり直線的な弾道が魅力なのでバックラバーとしてお勧めします。

  2025/09/19

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  SO-TEN

  

  I test-hit the FL 87g.

  In terms of category, it's a flexible-type inner carbon blade with a large head.
  It's built with the Harimoto ALC clearly in mind, but the biggest difference is that it's thinner.
  Being 0.3mm thinner gives it even more flex than the Harimoto. The ease of putting spin on the ball and the distance it flies both feel slightly better with this one.
  The issue is probably that the flex combined with centrifugal force makes it a bit harder to control. I got the impression that counter-hits tend to overshoot often.

  Otherwise, the grip shape is almost the same as the Harimoto, so if you were to choose this one over that on purpose, it'd probably be for the flex and the feel on contact.
  It has a fairly hard, piercing, highly metallic feel on contact, so I'd say it's worth trying out for yourself.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL87Gを試打しました。

  分類的にはしなる系の面の大きいインナーカーボンです。
  張本ALCをかなり意識した作りですが、板厚の薄さが最大の相違点です。
  0.3mm薄いことで張本以上のしなりがあります。回転の掛けやすさと飛距離はこちらの方が若干上な気もします。
  問題はしなりと遠心力が掛かってコントロールがしにくい点でしょうか。カウンター系がよくオーバーする印象です。

  その他グリップ形状もほぼ張本と一緒なので、その中であえてこちらを選ぶとしたらしなりと打球感でしょうか。
  割と硬めで突き抜けたような金属感の高い打球感なので、一度試打してみて欲しいですね。

  2025/08/13

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) RAKZA XX

  Recommend rubber(Back) MANTRA H

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  

  I used the FL 86 and 88g versions.

  As the title suggests, this is basically the Acoustic with a bit more bounce added.
  Even as an inner blade, the board thickness itself hasn't changed, and overall it doesn't bounce too much and grips the ball really well.
  How easily it takes spin hasn't changed either, so you can use it with almost the same feel as the original.

  So if you're switching from the original hoping for more bounce, you might end up a bit disappointed.
  The weighty feel is still wonderful, but since there's no dramatic change, you might honestly be better off going with the outer version instead.

  The standout feature, the grip, is shaped almost exactly like the Innerforce.
  It's a shape that suits most people, but if anything it's closer to the thicker style you see with players like Franziska or Ovtcharov.
  Some individual units were even thicker than that, so I'd recommend checking one in person at a store.
  The widened throat area also lets you get a firmer grip, and since the balance point has moved from the tip toward the handle, it doesn't feel as heavy as the numbers would suggest, which is another nice touch.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL86、88Gを使用しました。

  表題の通り、基本的には少し弾みが増したアコースティックです。
  インナーになっても板厚自体は変わっておらず、全体的に弾み過ぎず非常に球持ちが良いです。
  回転の掛けやすさも変わらず、オリジナルとあまり変わらない感覚で使用できます。

  なので、弾みを求めてオリジナルから変更すると肩透かしを食らうかもしれません。
  重みのある打球感は相変わらず素晴らしいのですが、劇的な変化はないのでいっそアウターにした方がいいのかもしれません。

  目玉のグリップはほぼインナーフォース形状です。
  万人受けしやすい形状ですが、どちらかと言えばフランチスカやオフチャロフのような太い系が近いでしょうか。
  個体によってはそれ以上に太いものもありましたので店頭確認をお勧めします。
  エラの広さが改善されてしっかり握れる上に、先端重心から手元重心に変わっているので数値上ほどの重さを感ないのもいいですね。

  2025/07/19

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Recommend rubber(Back) Tenergy 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  ZX-GEAR FIBER

  

  I used the FL81G version.

  This is one of the few surviving inner-fiber blades still made.
  The feel is almost like a 5-ply, but because of the fiber you can feel it gripping the ball and then pushing it back out.
  Notably, you can often return the ball even when it hits near the edge, and the sweet spot is wide enough to keep up with the trendy 158x152 blade shapes.
  It flexes well and resonates well in your hand. Compared to the Acoustic, the feel has more of a "Western wood" character to it, but it's a feel I personally like.
  Also, lighter-weight units tend to come up, so it's a blade I can recommend to beginners as well.

  As for the handle, it's wide side-to-side, on the thinner side in thickness, and the flare is also a bit wide.
  Since it has a large emblem on both sides, if when you grip it you notice something off, like your pinky sliding, you'd be better off avoiding it.
  Personally, I'd like to see this blade redesigned with a smaller emblem.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL81G品を使用しました。

  現存する数少ないインナーファイバーラケットです。
  感触はほぼ5枚合板ですが、ファイバーの分だけ掴んでから押し返す力を感じます。
  特に端に当たった時でも返球できることも多く、流行の158×152ブレードにも負けないスイートスポットの広さです。
  よくしなり、良く手に響きます。打球感はアコースティックに比べると洋材さを感じますが、自分は好みの打感です。
  また、軽量個体も出やすく初心者・初級者にもお勧めできる商品です。

  グリップに関しては横は幅広、厚みはやや薄めでエラもやや広めです。
  レンズが両面にある上に大きいので、握ってみて小指が滑る等の違和感があればやめた方がいいです。
  個人的には小さいレンズにして再デザインして欲しいラケットですね。

  2025/06/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) RAKZA XX

  Recommend rubber(Back) Rakza 7

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. Next >