O3's profile

O3's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 4〜5 years

User review

  • Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

    User review

    I used FL88.8G. It's extra-thick, double-sided, and weighs 184.8G.

    This racket features an Inner Force Layer ALC base with a 158x152 face.

    The wider face offers several advantages over previous models, including a larger sweet spot, reduced ALC's hard hitting feel, and increased power through centrifugal force.

    The grip is also slightly thinner than the previous Inner ALC, making it recommended for players with smaller hands.

    The biggest drawback is that the expanded face increases the overall weight, and the weight feels even heavier at the tip of the center of gravity.

    This is a problem that can be solved physically, but please be aware that it puts a lot of strain on your wrists when initially switching from a standard size.

    In my opinion, the feel of the ball on impact felt harder than with Revoldia CNF. The ALC itself may be a fairly hard material.

    It also flexed less than I expected, and I personally appreciate the fact that it doesn't hold the ball too much.
    It's easy to vary the strength of your hits, and the club's inherent lack of bounce makes it particularly easy to control on blocks and on the table.

    I think it's a great choice for younger players who are looking for something more physical.

    See original review

    2026/01/12
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL&HYDE V47.5

    Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • HYBRID MK

    User review

    I used the MAX rubber. It weighed about 71g before cutting and about 47g after cutting.

    The sheet has low grains, so it doesn't feel like it has much tension.
    The sponge doesn't have large bubbles, so it feels soft and bouncy overall.

    It seems to be relatively lightweight among German rubbers.

    Its distinctive features are that the ball tends to fly up quite high and it penetrates into the ground more easily than its hardness suggests.

    It penetrates into the ground easily, but even when you hit it close, it doesn't feel like the ball is dropping, so it's great for any swing style.

    However, you need to be careful as it doesn't produce much distance or speed and the ball flies in a high arc and shallowly.

    This rubber is a little different from the R48 or V47.5, which have similar hardness.

    I recommend pairing it with a slightly harder inner or outer racket.

    See original review

    2025/11/29
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    7
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • LIBERTA SOLID Pro

    User review

    I used the FL85G.

    This is an Inner Fiber racket made with Izanas.

    It has decent bounce, even for an Inner Fiber racket, and the ball flies out better than I expected.

    The feel of the ball resonates well in the hand, almost the same as a five-ply paulownia wood racket.

    Compared to the ZX Gear F, which is in the same category, this racket feels more focused on contact than spin.

    Thanks to its 6.0mm thickness, it doesn't flex too much, providing a high level of stability when contacting and blocking the ball.

    That said, it's not difficult to apply spin, and the exquisite balance is addictive.

    The grip is slightly thicker than Inner Force rackets, but there were some small differences that made it difficult to fit.

    The diagonally cut part at the base of the grip where the thumb rests is shorter than on Butterfly rackets, which tends to result in a slightly deeper grip.

    This can cause the surface to crumble, so I had to sand the grip for the first time. Please keep this in mind.

    If the grip fits your hand, this racket is a better choice than buying an inner carbon one.
    Please come and try it out in store.

    See original review

    2025/11/01
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) ROZENA

    Recommend rubber(Back) ROZENA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • TENERGY 05

    User review

    I reused the 2.1mm rubber on my forehand. It weighed about 45g after cutting.

    I previously used this rubber with a softer inner rubber, but the ball didn't travel as far as I expected, so I gave up on it.

    This time, I used it again with the outer rubber, and it felt incomparably better than before.

    To hit good shots with the 05, you need to make the ball dig in more than with the 64 or 80.

    Because the sheet is harder, the ball spins high when it reaches the sponge, with a high trajectory, penetrating deep into the opponent's court.

    Perhaps the stronger instantaneous impact to match the outer rubber paid off, or perhaps the harder racket improves the digging, but it's suddenly become much easier to use.

    Another advantage is that it produces high-swinging shots with slightly less force than German-style rubbers. It's no wonder it's called an auto-style rubber.

    See original review

    2025/10/05
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • FRANZISKA Innerforce ZLC

    User review

    I used the FL89G.

    The basic blade structure is the same as the Inner Force Layer ZLC.

    The differences are the lighter average weight due to the use of slightly lower-density wood, and the thick grip, similar to the Ovtcharov.

    The racket itself doesn't have much bounce, but the ZLC allows you to make a difference in ball quality between light and hard hits, which is great.

    You can either hit the ball far or not, so you can not only keep it on the table, but also add drop to your drives.

    The blade is 5.7mm thick, giving it a slight flex. It's less likely to be overwhelmed by counters or blocks than the Acoustic Inner.

    It's prone to dropping or becoming a straight shot if you hit it with your hand or lose your balance, and it's difficult to control when hitting it hard, but
    it was such a good racket that I wish I had tried the ZLC sooner.

    See original review

    2025/09/19
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    7
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL&HYDE V47.5

    Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. « First
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Top Players

Country

Style