NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 80

  

  I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs about 46g after cutting.

  Its performance falls exactly between the 05 and 64.

  It has an excellent balance of bite, grip, and launch power.

  It has the straight trajectory and decently high arc characteristic of Tenergy, plus a sense of speed at impact that the 05 lacks.

  Unlike the 64, it can be paired with wood rackets as well as harder carbon rackets, making it a rubber with a fairly wide range of tolerances.

  I think it can be used for both forehand and backhand shots, but I liked that it felt better to hold the club than the 64 when used with a backhand shot.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット後で約46Gです。

  05、64どちらの側面もある中間的なラバーです。
  05より柔らかい分の扱いやすさと64チックな直線軌道が差別化のポイントでしょうか。
  また、粒形状が近いロゼナからの移行先としても第一候補になるかと思われます。

  個人的には64より持つ感覚があり直線的な弾道が魅力なのでバックラバーとしてお勧めします。

  2025/09/19

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Tenergy 64

  

  I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs 66g before cutting and approximately 44g after cutting, making it quite lightweight.

  This rubber is still renowned as one of Tenergy's masterpiece series, and is considered the easiest to use, excluding FX.

  The sheet is quite soft even among its hardness range, but it doesn't feel like it's losing any power.

  It produces a straight trajectory, but also has good spin.

  It doesn't fly too far off the table, and I can even cut it myself with a push shot, so it feels very stable.

  The speed of the hit is particularly noteworthy. I can return the ball at high speed with little force. The back hit and back block felt great.

  Overall, I felt like the sheet could be a little harder, but considering the weight, I was satisfied with this product.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット前66G、カット後約44Gです。

  今なお最高傑作シリーズとして名高いテナジーで入門編とされているラバーです。
  05や80に比べてシートが格段に柔らかいので硬度以上の扱いやすさを感じますが、飛び出しがかなり早い点には注意が必要です。

  直線弾道で弧線は低めです。回転も掛けられますが、飛び出しが良いため思ったよりドライブは打ちにくいです。
  反面、ミート時には力を入れなくても抜群の鋭い打球が出せるラバーです。
  フォアよりブロックとミート安定目的でバック採用が安牌でしょうか。

  価格は相応に高いですが、性能と軽量さを兼ねた良いラバーです。
  ロゼナからの移行であれば80をお勧めしますが、こちらも一度お試しください。

  2025/09/04

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  SO-TEN

  

  I tried out the FL87G.

  It's classified as a flexible inner racket. Personally, I felt it had an exquisite balance of bounce, flex, and feel.

  Based on my experience using it, in terms of bounce, it goes as follows: Souten > Acoustic Inner > Inner Force ALC > Inner Force ALCS, and in terms of flex, it goes as follows: ALCS > Souten > Acoustic Inner > ALC.

  The feel on impact is high-pitched, typical of carbon, but perhaps because of the large blade, it resonates quite a bit in the hand. I was surprised that it flexed more than the Acoustic Inner.

  However, the flex was stronger than I expected, so I ended up hitting a few over-the-top shots on counters, etc.

  The larger blade size also creates a nice wide sweet spot.

  The grip is almost always an Inner Force type. The thickness is also 5.7mm, so ALCS is quite close.

  I was also surprised at how incredibly smooth the finish on the side of the grip was. The extremely meticulous finish is another plus point.
  I have never used Harimoto ALC before, so this is just my opinion at this point, but if you are just starting out with inner carbon, I would recommend this for those starting with 7 clubs.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL87Gを試打しました。

  分類的にはしなる系の面の大きいインナーカーボンです。
  張本ALCをかなり意識した作りですが、板厚の薄さが最大の相違点です。
  0.3mm薄いことで張本以上のしなりがあります。回転の掛けやすさと飛距離はこちらの方が若干上な気もします。
  問題はしなりと遠心力が掛かってコントロールがしにくい点でしょうか。カウンター系がよくオーバーする印象です。

  その他グリップ形状もほぼ張本と一緒なので、その中であえてこちらを選ぶとしたらしなりと打球感でしょうか。
  割と硬めで突き抜けたような金属感の高い打球感なので、一度試打してみて欲しいですね。

  2025/08/13

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA XX

  Recommend rubber（Back） MANTRA H

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  

  I used FL87G.

  This is an inner racket that has increased bounce while keeping the flex and ball holding as close as possible to the Acoustic.
  It's just right for stepping up from the Acoustic, but it feels like the good feel of the shot and the wide sweet spot are slightly compromised.
  This may be an individual difference in the racket due to the light weight of the individual racket.

  The grip is almost the same as the Inner Force, but it is slightly thicker near the base.
  The width of the jaw has also been improved, so you can hold it firmly.

  Personally, I'm satisfied because it's close to the ideal inner racket I was looking for.
  This time, the rubber I applied was quite soft and didn't suit me, so I'll try something around 48° next time.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL86、88Gを使用しました。

  表題の通り、基本的には少し弾みが増したアコースティックです。
  インナーになっても板厚自体は変わっておらず、全体的に弾み過ぎず非常に球持ちが良いです。
  回転の掛けやすさも変わらず、オリジナルとあまり変わらない感覚で使用できます。

  なので、弾みを求めてオリジナルから変更すると肩透かしを食らうかもしれません。
  重みのある打球感は相変わらず素晴らしいのですが、劇的な変化はないのでいっそアウターにした方がいいのかもしれません。

  目玉のグリップはほぼインナーフォース形状です。
  万人受けしやすい形状ですが、どちらかと言えばフランチスカやオフチャロフのような太い系が近いでしょうか。
  個体によってはそれ以上に太いものもありましたので店頭確認をお勧めします。
  エラの広さが改善されてしっかり握れる上に、先端重心から手元重心に変わっているので数値上ほどの重さを感ないのもいいですね。

  2025/07/19

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  ZX-GEAR FIBER

  

  I used the FL81G product.

  It is one of the few inner fiber rackets still in existence.
  It feels almost like a five-ply plywood racket, but the sweet spot is wider because of the fiber, and you can feel the force of pushing back after grabbing it compared to wood only.
  It flexes well and resonates well in your hand. The hitting feel feels a little cheap compared to an acoustic, but I like the feel.
  It is also a product that is recommended for beginners and novices, as it is easy to get lightweight pieces.

  As for the grip, it is wide on the sides, slightly thin in thickness, and the jaws are also slightly wide.
  Also, since the lenses are on both sides and are large, if you grip it and feel something strange, such as your little finger slipping, you should stop using it.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL81G品を使用しました。

  現存する数少ないインナーファイバーラケットです。
  感触はほぼ5枚合板ですが、ファイバーの分だけ掴んでから押し返す力を感じます。
  特に端に当たった時でも返球できることも多く、流行の158×152ブレードにも負けないスイートスポットの広さです。
  よくしなり、良く手に響きます。打球感はアコースティックに比べると洋材さを感じますが、自分は好みの打感です。
  また、軽量個体も出やすく初心者・初級者にもお勧めできる商品です。

  グリップに関しては横は幅広、厚みはやや薄めでエラもやや広めです。
  レンズが両面にある上に大きいので、握ってみて小指が滑る等の違和感があればやめた方がいいです。
  個人的には小さいレンズにして再デザインして欲しいラケットですね。

  2025/06/15

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA XX

  Recommend rubber（Back） Rakza 7

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. Next >