LIBERTA SOLID Pro

Everyone's rating

[Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Control and Spin are excellent.

(Click to show big size)

Averages reviews points

Evaluation: 9.56 / 10

Number of review: 18

Speed：7.56
Spin：9
Control：9.44

: Reviews of LIBERTA SOLID Pro. Players who use Racket evaluate various points such as hardness, momentum, weight, item by item to worry, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 2)

FL
ST
Japanese pen
Chinese pen

Specifications

Producer: DARKER

Product code: L3911

Material: Other, 7 ply wood

Thickness: 6mm

User reviews

Post a review

All Monthly

Kanrekitaro （Experience：More than ２０ years） The impact is stable and mistakes are greatly reduced.

I'm a 60-year-old man who uses a shakedown, back-drive attack style.

The impact is more stable and I make fewer mistakes.

Is it because of the longer contact time with the ball (ball holding, gripping) and the larger sweet spot?

I immediately bought a second club.

See original review Hide original review

2025/05/08

Overall	10/10
Speed	8
Spin	10
Control	10
Touch	10
Hardness	Soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) GLAYZER09C

Recommended rubber (Backhand) GLAYZER

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

1

Aoi Narusawa （Experience：１１〜２０ years） A very stable racket for intermediate players

I've been using it for about half a year. I think the appeal is the feel of the shot, which even 5-ply users will be satisfied with, and the high overall performance.

It contains special materials, but it doesn't feel that hard. I even think it's easy to use the technique of hitting.

The amount of rotation is sufficient and not much different from 5-ply. On top of that, the bounce is uniform, so you can achieve stable returns.

There are no outstanding points that are particularly good, but in any case, there are few drawbacks, so I think that any type of intermediate class player can use it without feeling uncomfortable.

Compared to Chosha's Inner Force ZLF (discontinued), it is a little heavier but is harder to push, and it seems to have better power for blocks and drives. I wonder if the ball speed and handling are better on that racket.

I think it is a racket that can be recommended to a wide range of people, from those who have been playing for about a year to those who have recently returned, and can be used with any rubber.

See original review Hide original review

2025/04/30

Overall	10/10
Speed	7
Spin	8
Control	9
Touch	9
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) Q QUALITY

Recommended rubber (Backhand) Vega Japan

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

1

Hakata Daimar Racket There is no better racket! The sweet spot is so big!

As the heading suggests, the biggest advantage is the wide sweet spot. Less missed shots = fewer mistakes = no points lost, so it's easier to win the game. The game is not always a full swing. This racket improves the quality of connecting balls, and will satisfy anyone at any level.
Thank you, Liberta.

See original review Hide original review

2024/04/05

Overall	10/10
Speed	10
Spin	10
Control	10
Touch	10
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) BLUESTORM PRO AM

Recommended rubber (Backhand) HYBRID MK

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

4

corner home run （Experience：６〜１０ years） Stable fiber racket that is easy to transition from wood

This is a racket that has a wood racket with the added feel of hitting the ball and the elongation of the ball.
When you hit it lightly, it feels like the ball is the same as a solid wood ball, but with a little extra speed, and when you hit it hard from the middle, it clearly flies more easily than a wood ball, so you can hit it comfortably.
Honestly, it's such a good racket that I think it might be upwardly compatible with almost all wood rackets.

The feel at impact is neither hard nor too soft, so I don't think you can choose which rubber to use.
The thickness of the board is just right, it rubs well, and once you bite into it, it flies as you want, and it's easy to meat, so there are no weak points.

This is a racket that we can confidently recommend to anyone who has been playing table tennis for more than three years and whose technique has stabilized, and who has not yet used a material system.
Of course, it will also be a great fit for athletes who have tried carbon-based products and found they cannot handle them.
The price is also cheaper than other materials, so I recommend you try it out.

See original review Hide original review

2023/10/26

Overall	10/10
Speed	8
Spin	9
Control	10
Touch	10
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) OMEGA V TOUR DF

Recommended rubber (Backhand) Vega Asia DF

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

4

Accurate （Experience：６〜１０ years） Versatile racket

With light hits, bench techniques, regular drives, and loop drives, you can hit the ball with a soft feel like that of 5 wood plywood, and with speed drives and angles, you can hit the ball with the speed of inner carbon. I feel that softer rubber is a better match.

See original review Hide original review

2023/09/23

Overall	9/10
Speed	8
Spin	9
Control	9
Touch	9
Hardness	Little soft

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

2

Gengar （Experience：６〜１０ years）

I borrowed an 84g one and hit it.
The ball releases faster than the Fortino Performance, and it feels better to hold the ball than the Inner Force Layer ALC, but it doesn't bounce.
Dyneema and Izanas used in Fortino Performance appear to be the same material. Although the plywood composition is different, Solid Pro has a more textured feel. Still, it felt more like wood than ALC.
Also, the grip is thick, but not too thick. I think it's something that even people who like thinner hair can get used to.

See original review Hide original review

2023/09/03

Overall	8/10
Speed	9
Spin	8
Control	9
Touch	9
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1

Recommended rubber (Backhand) RASANTER C48

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

3

tool swamp （Experience：１１〜２０ years） A racket that can reach itchy places

I bought it after watching the videos of Mr. Yu and Mr. Goburins.
*Previously, I was using Fortius FT RE.
It is a so-called inner fiber racket.
As a feature
・It has very good ball retention, but a powerful ball comes out when hitting hard.
・The block is very stable and the bench technology is very easy to do
・Because it is lightweight, it does not become excessive even if a heavy rubber is attached.
It is good for players who want stable play centered on the front and middle teams.
On the other hand, I don't think it's suitable for players who play from the back.
Wood is good for hitting feeling, operability on the table, and stability in the rally. However, it is highly recommended for players who want the power here!

See original review Hide original review

2022/09/24