NO.1 table tennis review site

User reviews

• 

  Hakata Daimar Racket There is no better racket! The sweet spot is so big!

  

  As the heading suggests, the biggest advantage is the wide sweet spot. Less missed shots = fewer mistakes = no points lost, so it's easier to win the game. The game is not always a full swing. This racket improves the quality of connecting balls, and will satisfy anyone at any level.
  Thank you, Liberta.

  See original review Hide original review

  見出しの通り、スイートスポットの広さが最大の長所です。打ち損じが減る=ミスが減る=得点を失わないので、試合に勝ちやすいです。試合は常にフルスイングというわけには行きません。繋ぎの球の質が高まるこのラケットは、どのレベル帯の人が使っても満足行く性能でしょう。
  ありがとうリベルタ。

  2024/04/05

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) BLUESTORM PRO AM

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) HYBRID MK

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  corner home run （Experience：６〜１０ years） Stable fiber racket that is easy to transition from wood

  

  This is a racket that has a wood racket with the added feel of hitting the ball and the elongation of the ball.
  When you hit it lightly, it feels like the ball is the same as a solid wood ball, but with a little extra speed, and when you hit it hard from the middle, it clearly flies more easily than a wood ball, so you can hit it comfortably.
  Honestly, it's such a good racket that I think it might be upwardly compatible with almost all wood rackets.

  The feel at impact is neither hard nor too soft, so I don't think you can choose which rubber to use.
  The thickness of the board is just right, it rubs well, and once you bite into it, it flies as you want, and it's easy to meat, so there are no weak points.

  This is a racket that we can confidently recommend to anyone who has been playing table tennis for more than three years and whose technique has stabilized, and who has not yet used a material system.
  Of course, it will also be a great fit for athletes who have tried carbon-based products and found they cannot handle them.
  The price is also cheaper than other materials, so I recommend you try it out.

  See original review Hide original review

  木材ラケットに芯を食ったような打球感と球の伸びをプラスしたラケットです。
  軽打だと純木材と変わらない球持ちに軽くスピードがプラスされたような感じで、中陣から強めに打つと明らかに木材より楽に飛んでくれるので気持ちよく打てます。
  正直ほぼ全ての木材ラケットの上位互換かも、と思ってしまうくらいには良いラケットです。

  打球感は硬くなく、柔らかすぎもしないので張るラバーは選ばないと思います。
  板厚も丁度良く、擦って良し、食い込ませれば思い通りに飛び、ミートもしやすいので弱点と呼べる弱点がありません。

  卓球を始めて3年以上ぐらいの技術が安定してきた選手で、尚且つまだ素材系を使っていない方であれば誰にでも自信をもっておススメできるラケットです。
  もちろんカーボン系を試して扱いきれないと思った選手にも抜群に合うでしょう。
  値段も他の素材系に比べれば安い方なので、是非一度試してみて欲しいです。

  2023/10/26

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) OMEGA V TOUR DF

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Vega Asia DF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Accurate （Experience：６〜１０ years） Versatile racket

  

  With light hits, bench techniques, regular drives, and loop drives, you can hit the ball with a soft feel like that of 5 wood plywood, and with speed drives and angles, you can hit the ball with the speed of inner carbon. I feel that softer rubber is a better match.

  See original review Hide original review

  軽打や台上技術、通常のドライブ、ループドライブでは木材5枚合板のような柔らかな打球感で打つことが出来、スピードドライブや角度うちではインナーカーボンレベルのスピードが出ます。柔らかめのラバーの方が相性がいい気がします。

  2023/09/23

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Gengar （Experience：６〜１０ years）

  

  I borrowed an 84g one and hit it.
  The ball releases faster than the Fortino Performance, and it feels better to hold the ball than the Inner Force Layer ALC, but it doesn't bounce.
  Dyneema and Izanas used in Fortino Performance appear to be the same material. Although the plywood composition is different, Solid Pro has a more textured feel. Still, it felt more like wood than ALC.
  Also, the grip is thick, but not too thick. I think it's something that even people who like thinner hair can get used to.

  See original review Hide original review

  84gのものを借りて打ちました。
  フォーティノパフォーマンスより玉離れは早くインナーフォースレイヤALCよりは球を持つ感覚はありますが弾まないです。
  フォーティノパフォーマンスに使われているダイニーマとイザナスは同じ素材のようです。合板構成が違いますがより素材感を感じるのがソリッドプロです。それでもALCに比べると木材らしさを感じました。
  また、グリップは太めですが太すぎなくて良いです。細めが好きな人でも慣れの範疇だと思います。

  2023/09/03

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) RASANTER C48

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  tool swamp （Experience：１１〜２０ years） A racket that can reach itchy places

  

  I bought it after watching the videos of Mr. Yu and Mr. Goburins.
  *Previously, I was using Fortius FT RE.
  It is a so-called inner fiber racket.
  As a feature
  ・It has very good ball retention, but a powerful ball comes out when hitting hard.
  ・The block is very stable and the bench technology is very easy to do
  ・Because it is lightweight, it does not become excessive even if a heavy rubber is attached.
  It is good for players who want stable play centered on the front and middle teams.
  On the other hand, I don't think it's suitable for players who play from the back.
  Wood is good for hitting feeling, operability on the table, and stability in the rally. However, it is highly recommended for players who want the power here!

  See original review Hide original review

  ゆうさん、ごぶりんずさんの動画を見て購入しました。
  ※以前は、フォルティウスFT REを使用しておりました。
  いわゆるインナーファイバー系のラケットです。
  特徴としては
  ・球持ちが非常によいですが、強打時は威力のあるボールが出ます。
  ・ブロックは非常に安定し、台上技術も非常やりやすい
  ・軽量であるため、重いラバーを貼っても重量過多にならない
  前・中陣を中心に安定したプレーを求める選手には良いです。
  一方で後陣からのプレーにもという選手には向かないと思います。
  打球感や台上の操作性、ラリーでの安定感は木材がいい。しかし、ここぞでの威力もほしいといった選手には非常にオススメです！

  2022/09/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R45

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) RASANTER R45

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Soil digging man （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Inner than outer

  

  I usually use ZX gear OUT.
  I got an individual of 83g, so I tried using it without changing the rubber. It was 178g including rubber.
  For an inner fiber, the feel is hard and the ball is well separated. On the other hand, receive, tabletop, and block can be stable.
  The speed and power are inferior to the outer, but the ball holding and rotation amount are perfect.
  It is especially recommended for outer users who want to stabilize the receive.

  See original review Hide original review

  普段はZXギアOUTを使っています。
  83gの個体が手に入ったので、ラバーを変えずに使ってみました。ラバー込みで178gでした。
  インナー系ファイバーにしては、打感が硬く、球離れがいいです。一方で、レシーブ、台上、ブロックは安定してできます。
  アウターよりスピード・威力は劣りますが、球持ち・回転量は申し分ないです。
  アウターユーザーでレシーブを安定させたい方は特にオススメです。

  2022/02/23

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) TRIPLE Double Extra

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) V＞15 Extra

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  NIKAIDOU （Experience：６〜１０ years） Lightweight and comfortable shot feeling

  

  I felt that the shot feeling was good, I didn't feel the texture so much, and I felt that the surface material was close to the shot feeling of 5 plywood.
  I think it's close to Energy Wood V2.
  Still, the momentum can be blown like a material. It is inferior to carbon fiber, but it is enough if it is about the middle team.

  I heard that the weight is around 85g and there is not much individual difference, so it is very light, and if it is a combination of my own rubber (double-sided special thickness), I will cut 180g.

  I had the image that many darkers are thick and difficult to handle, but I'm glad that this is a general thickness.
  One point to note is that when combined with the adhesive tension system, the height of the rubber arch is added in addition to the height of the racket, making it extremely difficult to control + it becomes difficult to punch out, so I felt it was a little difficult to handle.
  I feel that it goes well with a straight tension rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  兎に角打球感が良く、素材感をあまり感じず、表面材が固めの5枚合板の打球感に近いと感じました。
  エナジーウッドV2とかに近いと思います。
  それでいて弾みは素材らしく飛ばせます。カーボン系には劣りますが中陣ぐらいなら十分です。

  重量も85ｇ前後であまり個体差もないと聞いたので非常に軽く、自分のラバー（両面特厚）の組み合わせなら180ｇを切ります。

  ダーカーは板厚が厚く扱いづらいものが多いイメージでしたが、これは一般的な厚さなのも嬉しい。
  一つ注意点としては粘着テンション系と組み合わせると、ラケットの弧線高さに加えてラバーの弧線高さが足されて制御が凄く難しくなる+打ち抜きづらくなるのでやや扱いが難しいと感じました。
  直線的なテンションラバーとの相性が良く感じます。

  2022/01/10

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) DIGNICS 05

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >

Related racket

• 
  C-Hack
• 
  LIBERTA SYNERGY PLUS
• 
  5P-2A.Ri
• 
  7P-2A.Ri