NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza X

  

  I tried testing it with that wonder if fit to the back of the shake stuck on fore and say either was the impression that kana rubber which is facing shake to pounding. Goodness of being caught at the time of swipe is not noted, but the ball caught the sheet is thought small was not put out in a weak impact. The at light hitting I felt like a rubber easy to receive therefore in case of a light touch of the time receive is a rubber is hard to be affected by the ball of the opponent Saab by Consider It was Hikkakkari little impression of rubber . Only back technique, but it was easy to Yari because it was just a good rubber is caught is poking and Chiquita. But to some extent of the swipe force to maximize the features of this rubber it was felt necessary. But had also been featured in the table tennis kingdom weight is heavy, only suited for people who do not attach any rubber on one side of it was does not come out good and the impression that Intermediate more skill is required rubber of rubber pen holder with a light touch and I felt for the rubber are. To those who want a rotation and speed in Puraboru was felt that the rubber facing.

  See original review Hide original review

  シェークのバックに合うかなということで試しみましたがどちらかというとフォアに貼ってガンガンに振るのが向いているラバーかなという印象でした。強打時の引っ掛かりの良さは特筆ものですが、弱インパクトではシートの引っ掛かりが小さく思ったボールが出せませんでした。軽打時ににはラバーのひっかっかりが少ない印象でしたが考えようによってはレシーブ時の軽いタッチの際は相手サーブのボールの影響を受けづらいラバーなのでレシーブがしやすいラバーのように感じました。バック技術だけですがツッツキやチキータは引っ掛りがちょうど良いラバーだったのでやりやすかったです。しかしこのラバーの特徴を最大限引き出すにはある程度の強打力が必要と感じました。卓球王国でも取り上げられていましたが重量が重い、軽いタッチではラバーの良さが出ないと中級者以上の技量が必要なラバーという印象でしたがペンホルダーの片面にしかラバーを貼らない人には向いているラバー用に感じました。プラボールで回転とスピードが欲しい方には向いているラバーだと感じました。

  2016/12/06

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	4
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  24

• 

  VEGA TOUR

  

  Used in back (1.8 mm), the impression that rubber does not fly unless it strikes and rubs into rubber softly.
  Although the stuck on the seat was not bad, the trajectory was linear and was difficult to use.
  It may have been due to a bad timing, but on a day when the amount of moisture in the summer is large, the rubber slipped with moisture and dropped the BOTOBOTO ball and it was not used for a while.

  If you try it on the fore, the drive is low and it is a straight trajectory so you can hit a drive hard to counter.
  It was a lot of development that my own foredrive was driven by counters as it got time to wait for the opponent because it had a slight lateral rotation and the air time until it reached the opponent's court was long.
  The Vega Tour has a small arc and low ball speed, so the opponent of the ball arrives at the shortest at the time of driving this time, so it is less likely to be counted. .
  Omega V is easier to drive, but Vega Tour is better on the partner's difficulty in taking.
  It is also a point that there is 1.8 mm thickness of sponge which is easy to connect easily in privacy.
  Although it is "high Vega", I thought it was Vega, which is easy to handle and has performance over price.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックで使用(1.8mm)、ラバーが柔らかくラバーにくい込ませて打たないと飛んでくれない印象。
  シートの引っ掛かりは悪くないが弾道が直線的で使いにくかったです。
  たまたま時期が悪かったのかもしれないのですが夏場の湿気の量が多い日に湿気でラバーが滑ってボトボト球を落としてしまう事がありしばらく使っていませんでした。

  フォアで使ってみたらドライブが低く直線的な弾道のでカウンターされにくいドライブが打てます。
  自分のフォアドライブは少し横回転がかかっていて相手のコートのに到達するまでの対空時間が長いため相手に待つ時間を与えてしまいカウンターを打ち込まれてという展開が多かったです。
  ヴェガツアーは弧線が低く球速が早いお陰で球の相手がこちらのドライブ時に最短で台に届くのでカウンターされることが少なくなりました。。
  ドライブのやりやすさはオメガVの方が安定しましが、相手の取りにくさではヴェガツアーの方が上です。
  個人的にとっさの繋ぎがしやすいスポンジ厚が1.8mmがあるというのもポイントです。
  「お高いヴェガ」ではありますが、扱いやすく価格以上の性能を有しているヴェガだと思いました。

  2018/08/30

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket DYNA SEVEN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  23

• 

  Vega Asia

  

  Used for shake back (1.8 mm)
  I changed the rubber of the back of the shake and tried sticky and things of the high-end model, but I tried it, but it got moderately and it took a reasonable turn It felt very easy to use this rubber.
  Because the sponge thickness was as thin as 1.8 mm, I like the place where the defense technique and the stability of the tethered ball improved dramatically rather than the attack power decline.
  Just because it uses a racket that bounces instead of attacking power, the swipe speed and the seat are so soft that it is easy to catch on the seat and the amount of rotation of the drive is sufficient.
  From a junior in college age "High end rubber used by seniors is expensive and does not last long and Vega is enough if it is an intermediate level.It is easier to handle than the high end rubber that can not be handled and if you can use 100% It is enough for this person "and received a comment and tried using it. If you do not fly, you can hit it with a racket and body.
  For people accustomed to playing table tennis, I think that it is a rubber that uses this rubber and has an impression and is based on this as a base that is an indicator that "This is what I want for you" such as whether it is more spinning or more speed I will.

  See original review Hide original review

  シェークのバックに使用(1.8ｍｍ)
  シェークのバックのラバーを色々変えていて、粘着やハイエンドモデルの物なども試していたのですが、程よく弾み、程よく回転がかかるとても使いやすいこのラバーに行き着きました。
  スポンジ厚が1.8ｍｍと薄いこともあって攻撃力低下よりも守備技術やつなぎ球の安定性が飛躍的に向上した所が気に入りました。
  ただ攻撃力がないわけではなくて弾むラケットを使用しているため強打のスピードとシートが柔らかいためシートで引っ掛けやすくドライブの回転量は充分出ます。
  大学時代の後輩から「先輩が使っているハイエンドラバーなんて値段高いし長持ちしないし中級者だったらヴェガで十分ですよ。使いこなせないハイエンドラバーよりも扱いやすくて100％のヴェガの性能を使いきれば中級者はこれで十分です」とのコメントをいただき使用してみました。飛ばない分はラケットと体を使って打てば十分いけます。
  競技卓球に慣れてきた人にはこのラバーを使用し感想を持ちこれをベースにしてより回転なおか、よりスピードなのかなどの「これが自分には欲しい」用具を見定める指標になるラバーだと思います。

  2018/06/06

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  23

• 

  Rakza X Soft

  

  In looking for rubber that fits in the back of the shake I tried to use this rubber. Test hitting to the soft feel impressions, the weight is light, caught so feel good of the sheet, is in the soft rubber speed exits.
  We also want speed and rotation, also I think that it is a good rubber is for those who want to plus sense of stability. It was the rubber of the feeling I could use in the back in the foreground.
  Such I, but it was determined that he is this rubber can not be used after all. The most troubled of the defense technology, backfired softness of the sponge when you hit the poking, volley net mistake because the hammer remains bites the ball without having to rebound the ball from the bite the ball to a sponge. And to the poking it is not swung to lift up the racket to the time of hitting the ball throw-in did not go well. This is a How can good rubber was felt that rubber is not good command that does not fit in their own because it is their skill of problem.
  Speed, rotation, I think that it is a good rubber for those who want to use a good rubber than rubber you are using now so well the balance of control high-performance, there is also ease of use.

  See original review Hide original review

  シェークのバックに合うラバーを探す中でこのラバーを使用してみました。試打して感想が打感が柔らかい、重量が軽い、シートの引っ掛かり具合はいい感じ、柔らかいラバーにしてはスピードは出る。
  スピードや回転も欲しいし、安定感もプラスしたい方にはいいラバーだと思います。フォアでもバックでも使えそうな感じのラバーでした。
  なのですが、自分は結局このラバーは使えないと判断しました。一番困ったのは守備技術、ツッツキを打つ際にスポンジの柔らかさが裏目に出て、スポンジにボールが食い込んでからボールを反発することなくボールを食い込んだまま打ち出すのでネットミスを連発。ツッツキをするには打球時にラケットを上に持ち上げるように振らないと返球が上手くいきませんでした。これは自分の技量の問題なので良いラバーなのですが自分には合わない使いこなせないラバーだと感じました。
  スピード、回転、コントロールのバランスが良くて高性能、扱いやすさもあるので今使っているラバーよりも良いラバーを使いたいと思う人にはいいラバーだと思います。

  2016/12/08

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  23

• 

  Q4

  

  Until now I have used Vega Asia 1.8 mm as a back. This time 1.4mm of Q4 is used as back.
  I tried it with "trying Q4 for those who gave up on continued use by using Q3 with a test video of a certain net".
  Starting test hit, momentum is normal. There was no impression that it fly so much. Hit feeling is consolidated and seat gulping is also a favorite category.
  Comparing Q4 and Vega, I did not feel the difference in speed to that extent, but the rotational performance obviously was higher for Q4.
  Of course we can serve as well as drive. I'm doing it primarily in the backserv but now I can take service ace by downward rotation.
  The impression that the block often stops is a favorable impression and is easier to use than Q3. The ball that hit the ball entered the far end.
  I changed it to the fore and used it, but compared with the Vega tour of the fore, the speed is Vega, but I felt that the rotation rate and stability are higher for Q4.
  It was an impression that I let it fly when I wanted to fly, and when I wanted to suppress it I was holding rubber.
  I think that it is a rubber that can be used for both the fore and back. Neck is a price, Vega is better than Cospa so I'm worried about whether to use Q4 or Vega.

  See original review Hide original review

  今までヴェガアジア1.8mmをバックに使用してました。今回はQ4の1.7mmをバックに使用。
  某ネットの試打動画で「Q3使って継続使用を諦めた人もQ4を試してみて」とのことで試してみました。
  試打開始、弾みは普通。そんなに飛ぶなぁといった印象は無かったです。打感は固めでシートの食い込みもよく好みの部類。
  Q4とヴェガ両者を比較してスピードの差はそこまで感じませんでしたが回転性能はは明らかにQ4の方が上でした。
  ドライブ、チキータはもちろんサーブも安定して切れます。基本バックサーブ主体でやってますが下回転でサービスエースが取れるようになりました。
  ブロックがよく止まるのが好印象でQ3よりも使いやすい印象。打球した球が台の一番奥に入ってくれました。
  フォアに持ち変えて使用しましたが、フォアのヴェガツアーと比較して直線弾道かつスピードはヴェガの方がありますが回転量と安定度はQ4の方が上だと感じました。
  飛ばしたい時に飛ばせて、抑えたい時は抑えてくれるラバーといった印象でした。
  フォア、バック両面に使えるラバーだと思います。ネックは値段ですね、ヴェガの方がコスパは良いのでQ4かヴェガのどちら使うか悩みどころです。

  2018/12/24

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket DYNA SEVEN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  19

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. Next >