NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  V＞15 Extra

  

  I liked the playing style of VICTAS-sponsored players and tried this a few times, but it didn't suit me and I gave up.
  However, when I switched my blade to the Koki Niwa Wood and tried again, it clicked. (The Innerforce ZLC and the Koki Niwa blade didn't suit me.)

  The sheet is soft and the sponge is on the firm side; some of this may come down to blade compatibility, but the control is excellent.
  The arc also wasn't as low as I expected, and I felt plenty of lift when driving.

  As others have said too, the best thing about this rubber above all is the counter. The sheet doesn't give way, letting you turn the opponent's ball into your own with a stable feel, while still sending back a powerful shot.

  The forehand is also really easy to use, but the backhand is easy too — for chiquitas and close-to-the-table drives — so I use it on both sides. Blocking is also very easy (maybe because the sheet is strong yet soft?), so I feel I can recommend it for the backhand as well.

  It's a high-end rubber, but I found it surprisingly easy to use, so if you think about blade compatibility, I think even students could use it just fine.

  See original review Hide original review

  VICTAS選手のプレースタイルが好きで何度か挑戦しましたが合わずに折れていました。
  しかし、ラケットを丹羽孝希WOODに変えて改めて挑戦したらしっくりきました。（インナーフォースZLC、丹羽孝希は自分には合いませんでした）

  シートは柔らかく、スポンジは固め、ラケットの相性によるものもあると思いますが非常にコントロールが効きます。
  弧線も思ったより低いわけではなく、持ち上げる力は十分に感じました。

  他の方も言われていますが、なによりもこのラバーのいいところはカウンターですね。シートが負けることなく相手の球を自分の球にして返せる安定感がありながら、威力のあるボールが返っていきます。

  フォアも非常に使いやすいですが、バックもﾁｷｰﾀや前陣ﾄﾞﾗｲﾌﾞなどやりやすく自分は両面で使っています。ブロックも非常にやり易い（シートが強く、柔らかいため？）のでバックでもおススメできると感じます。

  ハイエンドラバーではありますが、意外にも使いやすさのあるラバーだなと感じたので、ラケットとの相性を考えられるのであれば学生でも十分に使っていけるかと思います。

  2020/11/28

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  18

• 

  ALTIUS COMBO

  

  This is amazing.
  I'm using the lightweight 81g version, and it manages to combine bounce with that grabbing feel while still giving you plenty of feedback on contact and making the ball easy to control.

  The closest comparisons would be inner blades that lean toward outer-type performance (like the Arylate Inner or Innerforce ZLC), but personally I feel more bounce from this one than from those. Also, compared to a typical inner blade, it's easier to use a whippy, flexing stroke (the kind of stroke you'd normally use with a thin-ply outer blade).
  It really is the best of both inner and outer worlds. On hard shots, if you focus on the flex you get a heavy ball that keeps carrying, while if you focus on driving through the ball you get a fast, quick-off-the-blade shot - you can freely switch between the two.

  It's lightweight, high-performing across the board, and has a fresh feel to it. Since you can use so many different strokes with it, I'd recommend it to pretty much anyone at intermediate level and above.
  Also, because it supports so many different strokes, consciously switching between them might let you add even more variation and changes of pace. This is definitely a blade I'd want everyone to try at least once.

  See original review Hide original review

  めちゃくちゃいいです。
  81ｇの軽量品使っていますが、弾みと掴む感覚を両立していて、かつ打球感も十分感じられて球をコントロールするのも容易です。

  近いラケットだとアウター寄りインナーラケット系（アルネイドインナーやインナーフォースＺＬＣなど）になりますが、それよりも個人的には弾む感覚が強く感じます。また、通常のインナー系と比べるとしならせる打ち方もやりやすく感じます。（よくある板薄アウター系の打ち方）
  まさにインナーとアウターのいいとこどりですね。強打時はしなりを意識した打ち方なら伸びるような重い球が、ぶつける打ち方だと初速の早いスピードボールがと自由自在に打ち分けられます。

  軽量かつ、全体的に高性能で目新しさがある本ラケット。色んな打ち方ができるので中級帯以上なら万人に勧められます。
  また、いろんな打ち方できるのでその打ち分けを意識的にすることでより変化や緩急をつけていくこともできるかもしれません。是非一度は試してもらいたい商品です。

  2021/12/25

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Q QUALITY

  Recommend rubber(Back) Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  STRADIVARIUS

  

  Like a lot of people say, it's quite close to the Timo Boll.
  It leans more toward the Spirit than the ALC, and since the blade is thin, you can feel the flex while putting heavy spin on the ball.
  It has plenty of bounce too, and I felt it paired really well with the same brand's Omega VII.

  It's also inexpensive and easy to handle, so it might be a good entry point into composite blades.
  Also, if you used the Timo Spirit before but the Timo Boll ALC didn't suit you, I think it's worth giving this one a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  各所で言われていますが、かなりティモボルに近いです。
  ALCよりスピリット寄りで、板厚が薄いこともありブレードのしなりを感じながら強烈に回転をかけることができます。
  弾みも十分あり、同社のオメガⅦとの相性は非常に良いと感じました。

  値段も安く、扱いやすさも兼ね備えていて、特殊素材入り入門にも良いかもしれません。
  また、過去にティモスピ使ってたけど、ティモボルALCは合わなかったんだよなーという方には一度試してみる価値あると思います。

  2020/12/02

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) OMEGA VII TOUR

  Recommend rubber(Back) OMEGA VII EURO

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  KOKI NIWA WOOD

  

  I'd always used a carbon blade before, but I bought this because I wanted to switch to an all-wood one.
  I also wanted to move from one-shot-kill table tennis toward valuing rallies and stability, so on a recommendation I put Ventus on it.

  I got exactly the performance I was after - stability close to the table, and the reassurance from the blade's thickness that I won't get pushed around by the opponent's shots no matter how they come in.
  In practice I felt a slight lack of power, but in match play, even from a broken-down position, the good ball-holding lets me keep control, so if anything the power of my connecting shots actually felt like it went up.
  In pure mid-distance exchanges I do feel a lack of power, but thanks to how easy it is to counter and the good control, I've been able to win more points in rallies than before.

  I think this blade shines more in matches than in practice, so I'd really recommend trying it out in a match-style hit.
  Also, it pairs amazingly with Ventus. If you're after stability, definitely give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  普段からカーボン入りを使用していましたが、木材ラケットに変更しようと思い購入。
  一発で打ち抜く卓球からラリー重視、安定重視にしたい想いもあったのでお勧めされたヴェンタスを貼っています。

  前陣での安定感と板厚の厚みで相手のボールに左右されない安心感など自分の求めていた性能は満足できました。
  練習だと威力不足を少し感じましたが、実戦形式だと崩れた体制からでも球持ちの良さでコントロールできる為、むしろ繋ぎの球の威力が上がったように思います。
  純粋な中陣での撃ち合いでは威力不足を感じますがカウンターのやり易さとコントロールのよさで以前よりラリーで点数を取れるようになったと思います。

  練習よりも実戦で輝くラケットだと思うので是非試合形式で試打して頂けたらと思います。
  あとヴェンタスとの相性は最高です。安定を求める方は是非お試しを。

  2020/11/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) SUPER VENTUS

  Recommend rubber(Back) Ventus Spin

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• Ventus Spin

  

  I use this on my backhand.
  Compared to the Super Ventus it feels like a plainer rubber, but I think it holds up just as well overall.
  It doesn't fly too much so you can control it properly, while still getting plenty of spin.
  Like the whole Ventus series, it's good at lifting the ball up, and true to that, this rubber also makes it easy to attack backspin balls.

  The reason I use it on my backhand is its light weight — I don't think there are many rubbers this light with this level of performance.
  I think it's a good fit for the backhand of intermediate players and above, or the forehand of beginner-to-intermediate players.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックで使用しています。
  スーパーヴェンタスと比べて地味な印象のラバーですが、遜色ないレベルで総合力があるラバーだと思います。
  飛びすぎないのできちんとコントロールでき、かつ回転はガッツリかけることができます。
  ヴェンタスシリーズ共通ですが上に持ち上がる性能が良く、このラバーも例に漏れず下回転打ちがやりやすいです。

  自分がバックで使用している理由としては重量が軽いためですが、この性能でここまで軽いラバーはなかなかないと思います。
  中級者以上のバックハンド、初中級レベルでのフォアハンドでの採用がいいんじゃないかと私は思います。

  2020/11/23

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  13

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. Next >