NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  It is a well-balanced rubber in all.
  It is characterized by high arch lines such as tenergy, and it is also interesting that the characteristics change depending on the combination with the racket.
  If you combine it with carbon, you can hit a heavy ball, and if you combine it with wood, it will not fly too much and it will be easy to handle.
  To put it the other way around, the impression will change depending on the combination, so it may be better to consider a racket when using it.

  The price is reasonable and the performance is high, but the drawback is the weight. If it is extra thick, it will exceed 50g after cutting, so be careful when pasting it on both sides.

  See original review Hide original review

  全てにおいてバランスの良いラバーです。
  テナジー等にある高い弧線が特徴でラケットとの組み合わせで特徴が変わってくる面白さもあります。
  カーボン系に組み合わせれば重い球が打てますし、木材系に組み合わせれば飛びすぎず扱いやすい印象になります。
  逆を言えば組み合わせで印象が変わってしまうので使う際にはラケットも検討した方が良いかもしれません。

  値段も手ごろで高性能ですが、欠点を挙げるとするなら重量でしょうか。特厚だとカット後50g越えなので両面に貼る場合は注意が必要です。

  2020/11/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  OMEGA VII ASIA

  

  It is a very easy-to-use piece.
  The impression that you can make a firm impact even if you rub it slightly with a sheet that has a biting feeling like XIOM's rubber.
  The ball is moderately rough and the control is effective, and the arc line is low, but a powerful straight ball goes.

  However, the characteristics of OMEGA, which has a taut feeling and is easy to tip, remained the same. At the time of blocking, if it was a block to hold down when returning a strong ball, it fell and went straight to the net. It seems that it is necessary to block back against a strong ball.

  Except for that one point, I think it is a fairly high-performance rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  非常に扱いやすい一枚です。
  XIOMのラバーらしい噛みつく感覚があるシートでやや擦り打ちしてもしっかりインパクトできる印象。
  球も程よく荒れたりしながらコントロールも効き、弧線は低めですが威力のある直線的なボールがいきます。

  ただし、シートがピンッと張っている感がありチップしやすいオメガの特徴はそのままでした。ブロックの際、強烈なボールを返す時に抑えるブロックだと落ちてネットに直行しました。強いボールに対してはかけ返すブロックをする必要がありそうです。

  その一点を除けばかなり高性能のラバーだと思います。

  2020/11/26

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket STRADIVARIUS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  ALTIUS OUTER

  

  It is a review with a lightweight individual of about 80 g, double-sided QQ.
  At first, I was confused because I didn't know how to hit it, but when I made a strong impact, it showed its true value.
  The momentum is light but sufficient, and the ball is released very quickly enough to give enough momentum to the middle to apse.
  However, with a light hit, there is almost no shot feeling and it is difficult to control and rotate.
  However, with regard to strong swing techniques such as loop drive and cut, rotation is applied without problems and it is within the range that can be controlled.
  Rabbits have a weaker shot feeling than other soft outerwear (ALC series, etc.), so I had the impression that the ball would run and stabilize if I could be aware of the impact.

  The feeling of use is similar to Yasaka's Arnade and Tamasu's Jun Mizutani, but I think the point of this racket is that it is much lighter than that. The momentum is also perfect.
  I felt very good when I went to the third ball in the fore, but when I connected it in the back, the impact was not enough and I often made a net mistake.
  Recommended for players who mainly play the third ball or who are confident in the impact of both hands and who want both speed and lightness.

  See original review Hide original review

  80ｇ程度の軽量個体、両面ＱＱでのレビューです。
  最初のうちは打ち方がわからず戸惑いながらでしたが、強めにインパクトした時真価を発揮しました。
  弾みは軽量でありながら十分で、中陣～後陣でも十分に勢いを出せるほど球離れも非常に早いです。
  しかし、軽打では打球感がほぼ無くコントロールや回転に関しては難しいです。
  ただし、ループドライブやカットなどの強くスイングする技術に関しては問題なく回転も掛かり、コントロールもできる範囲になります。
  兎に角、他柔らかめアウター系（ＡＬＣ系など）と比べると強く打たなければ打球感が薄いのでしっかりインパクトを意識できると球が走る＆安定するという印象でした。

  使用感は別メーカーでいうとヤサカのアルネイドや、タマスの水谷隼が近いですがそれに比べて非常に軽量な点がこのラケットのポイントかと思います。弾みも申し分ありません。
  自分はフォアで3球目行く時は非常に好感触でしたが、バックでつなぐ時はインパクトが足らずネットミスすることもしばしば・・・。
  3球目主体のプレイヤーや、両ハンドのインパクトに自信のあるプレイヤーでスピードと軽さ、両方を求める方におすすめです。

  2021/12/23

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Q QUALITY

  Recommend rubber（Back） Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  

  I felt that the shot feeling was good, I didn't feel the texture so much, and I felt that the surface material was close to the shot feeling of 5 plywood.
  I think it's close to Energy Wood V2.
  Still, the momentum can be blown like a material. It is inferior to carbon fiber, but it is enough if it is about the middle team.

  I heard that the weight is around 85g and there is not much individual difference, so it is very light, and if it is a combination of my own rubber (double-sided special thickness), I will cut 180g.

  I had the image that many darkers are thick and difficult to handle, but I'm glad that this is a general thickness.
  One point to note is that when combined with the adhesive tension system, the height of the rubber arch is added in addition to the height of the racket, making it extremely difficult to control + it becomes difficult to punch out, so I felt it was a little difficult to handle.
  I feel that it goes well with a straight tension rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  兎に角打球感が良く、素材感をあまり感じず、表面材が固めの5枚合板の打球感に近いと感じました。
  エナジーウッドV2とかに近いと思います。
  それでいて弾みは素材らしく飛ばせます。カーボン系には劣りますが中陣ぐらいなら十分です。

  重量も85ｇ前後であまり個体差もないと聞いたので非常に軽く、自分のラバー（両面特厚）の組み合わせなら180ｇを切ります。

  ダーカーは板厚が厚く扱いづらいものが多いイメージでしたが、これは一般的な厚さなのも嬉しい。
  一つ注意点としては粘着テンション系と組み合わせると、ラケットの弧線高さに加えてラバーの弧線高さが足されて制御が凄く難しくなる+打ち抜きづらくなるのでやや扱いが難しいと感じました。
  直線的なテンションラバーとの相性が良く感じます。

  2022/01/10

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  NEO HURRICANE 3

  

  I tried the Nittaku version of NEO3 in the back.
  The sponge is softer and easier to use than ordinary adhesives, but the sheet is hard and requires some impact.

  If it is a back, it is easy to add power and change if you consciously hit the tip of the racket. Connecting in a difficult position tends to be a stick ball, so I felt that I needed an arm that could be devised such as changing the rotation.

  It goes without saying that Tsuttsuki, loops, and blocks are weapons that lead to points.
  I think it's good to always have the consciousness to put out a high quality ball because you can make changes by yourself because the depth, rotation and speed do not come out with auto.

  I liked it so much that I thought I would use it for a while. It's a good rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  ニッタク版のNEO3をバックで試打しました。
  普通の粘着系に比べるとスポンジ柔らかく使いやすいですが、シートは硬いのである程度インパクトが必要です。

  バックだとラケット先端を意識して当てると威力も変化も付けやすいです。苦しい体勢での繋ぎは棒玉になりがちなので、回転の変化をつけるなどの工夫できる腕が必要に感じました。

  ツッツキやループ、ブロックは言わずもがなで得点に繋がる武器になります。
  オートで深さや回転やスピードが出ない分、変化を自分で付けていけるので質の高いボールを出す意識を常に持つといいと思いました。

  自分はしばらく使いこもうと思うくらいには気に入りました。良いラバーです。

  2022/01/28

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3