NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID AIM

  

  I bought this because it's said to be the outer version of the same maker's Solid Pro, but I found the feel is quite different.
  The Solid Pro had a strong wood-like feel, but this one really brings out the special-material feel.
  That said, it's not a stiff, carbon-like feel — a slightly softer feel on contact is what stands out.

  It had more distance than the Solid Pro, and I got a good impression from fast-paced, punchy play close to the table, so I think it'd be especially good for players who fight from close-to-mid distance.

  Before buying I imagined something like the Timo Boll Spark, but
  the Solid Aim has a standard blade thickness of 6mm, which made it easy to use.
  (The Timo Boll Spark is apparently 5.4mm.)
  The feel is also milder because of the thicker blade.

  Performance-wise it handles everything competently, so I don't think it's picky about rubber.
  The weight also averages on the lighter side, same as the Solid Pro, so you should be able to match it with a rubber suited to your level and preferred feel.

  It's more mellow than carbon, so I'd recommend it to players who fight close-to-mid distance, or to anyone stepping up from a more wood-like racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  同社製ソリッドプロのアウター版とのことで購入しましたが、かなりテイストが違うなと思いました。
  ソリッドプロは木材の感覚が強かったですが、こちらは素材感を十分に出してくれています。
  かといってカーボンのような硬い打球感ではなくやや柔らかめの打球感が特徴です。

  飛距離はソリッドプロより出ていましたし、前陣でピッチの早い弾くプレーも好感触で、前～中陣で戦うプレイヤーにとっては特に良いのかなと思いました。

  買う前はティモボルスパークのようなのを想像していましたが、
  ソリッドエイムは板厚が6㎜で標準的板厚の為使いやすさがありました。
  （ティモボルスパークは5.4㎜だそうです）
  打球感も板厚の分マイルドです。

  性能も何でもそつなくこなせる系なので、ラバーを選ばないと思います。
  重量もソリッドプロと同じく平均が軽めなので、自分のレベルや好きな打球感のラバーを合わせていける筈です。

  カーボンと比べたら大人しいので前～中陣で戦う方や、木材寄りのラケットからのステップアップなど、
  そういった方々にお勧めです。

  2024/07/19

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) DIGNICS 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  Like a lot of people say, it makes backhand topspin drives incredibly easy.
  I'd especially recommend it to people who struggle with backhand drives against backspin.
  That said, it's not like other techniques become harder either - it feels stable and easy to use overall.

  If you have trouble with backhand drives against backspin, or want more stable backhand play, why not give it a try on your backhand?

  See original review Hide original review

  各所で言われていますが、バックドライブのやり易さが凄いです。
  特に下回転に対してのバックドライブが苦手な人にはお勧めできます。
  かといって他の技術もやりにくいといったことはなく、安定して使っていける印象です。

  下回転に対してのバックドライブに課題ある方、バックに安定したプレーを求める方はバックで一度試してみるのはどうでしょうか？

  2020/12/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket SEGNA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  It's a rubber that's well-balanced in every respect.
  Its high arc, similar to Tenergy and rubbers like it, is a defining feature, and it's also interesting how its character changes depending on what blade you pair it with.
  Pair it with a carbon blade and you can hit heavy balls; pair it with an all-wood blade and it feels more manageable without flying too much.
  On the flip side, that means the impression changes a lot depending on the pairing, so it might be worth thinking about the blade too when you use it.

  It's reasonably priced with high performance, but if I had to name a drawback, it would be the weight. At max thickness it's over 50g after cutting, so you need to be careful if you're putting it on both sides.

  See original review Hide original review

  全てにおいてバランスの良いラバーです。
  テナジー等にある高い弧線が特徴でラケットとの組み合わせで特徴が変わってくる面白さもあります。
  カーボン系に組み合わせれば重い球が打てますし、木材系に組み合わせれば飛びすぎず扱いやすい印象になります。
  逆を言えば組み合わせで印象が変わってしまうので使う際にはラケットも検討した方が良いかもしれません。

  値段も手ごろで高性能ですが、欠点を挙げるとするなら重量でしょうか。特厚だとカット後50g越えなので両面に貼る場合は注意が必要です。

  2020/11/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  

  The feel is really good overall — you barely notice it's a special material blade, and it feels close to a stiff 5-ply wood blade.
  It reminds me of something like the Energy Wood V2.
  Even so, it still has the kind of speed you'd expect from a special material blade. It's not as fast as carbon blades, but it's plenty for mid-distance play.

  I heard the weight (around 85g) doesn't vary much between individual blades, and mine is very light — with my rubbers (max thickness on both sides) the total comes in under 180g.

  I had the image that Darker blades tend to be thick and hard to handle, but I'm glad this one has a fairly standard thickness.
  One thing to note: if you pair it with tacky tension rubber, the arc height of the blade plus the arc height of the rubber stack up, making control quite difficult and making it harder to punch through the ball, so it felt a bit tricky to handle.
  It seems to match better with straighter tension rubbers.

  See original review Hide original review

  兎に角打球感が良く、素材感をあまり感じず、表面材が固めの5枚合板の打球感に近いと感じました。
  エナジーウッドV2とかに近いと思います。
  それでいて弾みは素材らしく飛ばせます。カーボン系には劣りますが中陣ぐらいなら十分です。

  重量も85ｇ前後であまり個体差もないと聞いたので非常に軽く、自分のラバー（両面特厚）の組み合わせなら180ｇを切ります。

  ダーカーは板厚が厚く扱いづらいものが多いイメージでしたが、これは一般的な厚さなのも嬉しい。
  一つ注意点としては粘着テンション系と組み合わせると、ラケットの弧線高さに加えてラバーの弧線高さが足されて制御が凄く難しくなる+打ち抜きづらくなるのでやや扱いが難しいと感じました。
  直線的なテンションラバーとの相性が良く感じます。

  2022/01/10

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  ALTIUS OUTER

  

  This is a review of a lightweight ~80g unit, with QQ rubber on both sides.
  At first I wasn't sure how to hit with it and felt a bit lost, but it really showed its true value when I made contact with a strong impact.
  Despite being lightweight, the bounce is more than enough, and the ball leaves the blade very quickly, so you can generate plenty of pace even from mid to far distance.
  However, on soft hits there's almost no feel at all, which makes control and spin difficult.
  That said, for techniques that require a strong swing, like loop drives or chops, there's no problem — you still get proper spin and a manageable level of control.
  All in all, compared to other soft outer blades (like ALC-type blades), the feel is faint unless you hit it hard, so if you can commit to a solid impact, the ball really flies and stays stable.

  As for the feel, it's closest to Yasaka's Arnaid or Butterfly's Jun Mizutani blade from other manufacturers, but I think the fact that this one is so much lighter is its selling point. The bounce leaves nothing to be desired either.
  For me, going for the third ball on the forehand felt really good, but on the backhand when connecting shots I sometimes didn't get enough impact and missed into the net...
  I'd recommend this to players who focus on the third ball, or to two-winged players confident in their impact on both sides who want both speed and lightness.

  See original review Hide original review

  80ｇ程度の軽量個体、両面ＱＱでのレビューです。
  最初のうちは打ち方がわからず戸惑いながらでしたが、強めにインパクトした時真価を発揮しました。
  弾みは軽量でありながら十分で、中陣～後陣でも十分に勢いを出せるほど球離れも非常に早いです。
  しかし、軽打では打球感がほぼ無くコントロールや回転に関しては難しいです。
  ただし、ループドライブやカットなどの強くスイングする技術に関しては問題なく回転も掛かり、コントロールもできる範囲になります。
  兎に角、他柔らかめアウター系（ＡＬＣ系など）と比べると強く打たなければ打球感が薄いのでしっかりインパクトを意識できると球が走る＆安定するという印象でした。

  使用感は別メーカーでいうとヤサカのアルネイドや、タマスの水谷隼が近いですがそれに比べて非常に軽量な点がこのラケットのポイントかと思います。弾みも申し分ありません。
  自分はフォアで3球目行く時は非常に好感触でしたが、バックでつなぐ時はインパクトが足らずネットミスすることもしばしば・・・。
  3球目主体のプレイヤーや、両ハンドのインパクトに自信のあるプレイヤーでスピードと軽さ、両方を求める方におすすめです。

  2021/12/23

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Q QUALITY

  Recommend rubber(Back) Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >