NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  As it is said in various places, the ease of back drive is amazing.
  Especially recommended for those who are not good at back drive for downward rotation.
  However, it is not difficult to do other technologies, and I have the impression that it can be used stably.

  If you have a problem with back drive against downward rotation, or if you want stable play in the back, why not try it once in the back?

  See original review Hide original review

  各所で言われていますが、バックドライブのやり易さが凄いです。
  特に下回転に対してのバックドライブが苦手な人にはお勧めできます。
  かといって他の技術もやりにくいといったことはなく、安定して使っていける印象です。

  下回転に対してのバックドライブに課題ある方、バックに安定したプレーを求める方はバックで一度試してみるのはどうでしょうか？

  2020/12/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket SEGNA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  It is a well-balanced rubber in all.
  It is characterized by high arch lines such as tenergy, and it is also interesting that the characteristics change depending on the combination with the racket.
  If you combine it with carbon, you can hit a heavy ball, and if you combine it with wood, it will not fly too much and it will be easy to handle.
  To put it the other way around, the impression will change depending on the combination, so it may be better to consider a racket when using it.

  The price is reasonable and the performance is high, but the drawback is the weight. If it is extra thick, it will exceed 50g after cutting, so be careful when pasting it on both sides.

  See original review Hide original review

  全てにおいてバランスの良いラバーです。
  テナジー等にある高い弧線が特徴でラケットとの組み合わせで特徴が変わってくる面白さもあります。
  カーボン系に組み合わせれば重い球が打てますし、木材系に組み合わせれば飛びすぎず扱いやすい印象になります。
  逆を言えば組み合わせで印象が変わってしまうので使う際にはラケットも検討した方が良いかもしれません。

  値段も手ごろで高性能ですが、欠点を挙げるとするなら重量でしょうか。特厚だとカット後50g越えなので両面に貼る場合は注意が必要です。

  2020/11/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID AIM

  

  I bought this because it was the outer version of the Solid Pro made by the same company, and I thought the taste was quite different.
  The Solid Pro had a strong wood feel, but this one brings out the texture of the material.
  However, it is not a hard hitting feel like carbon, but a slightly softer hitting feel.

  The distance was longer than the Solid Pro, and the fast pitch play in the front court was also good, so I thought it would be especially good for players who play in the front to middle court.

  Before buying it, I was imagining something like the Timo Bolls Spark, but the Solid Aim is easy to use because it has a standard board thickness of 6 mm.
  (The Timo Bolls Spark is 5.4 mm.)
  The hitting feel is also mild due to the board thickness.

  It has performance that can handle anything well, so I don't think you can choose a rubber.
  The weight is also light on average like the Solid Pro, so you should be able to match it to your level and the rubber that you like.

  It's more docile than carbon, so it's recommended for those who play in the front to middle of the court, or for those looking to step up from a wooden racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  同社製ソリッドプロのアウター版とのことで購入しましたが、かなりテイストが違うなと思いました。
  ソリッドプロは木材の感覚が強かったですが、こちらは素材感を十分に出してくれています。
  かといってカーボンのような硬い打球感ではなくやや柔らかめの打球感が特徴です。

  飛距離はソリッドプロより出ていましたし、前陣でピッチの早い弾くプレーも好感触で、前～中陣で戦うプレイヤーにとっては特に良いのかなと思いました。

  買う前はティモボルスパークのようなのを想像していましたが、
  ソリッドエイムは板厚が6㎜で標準的板厚の為使いやすさがありました。
  （ティモボルスパークは5.4㎜だそうです）
  打球感も板厚の分マイルドです。

  性能も何でもそつなくこなせる系なので、ラバーを選ばないと思います。
  重量もソリッドプロと同じく平均が軽めなので、自分のレベルや好きな打球感のラバーを合わせていける筈です。

  カーボンと比べたら大人しいので前～中陣で戦う方や、木材寄りのラケットからのステップアップなど、
  そういった方々にお勧めです。

  2024/07/19

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） DIGNICS 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  ALTIUS OUTER

  

  It is a review with a lightweight individual of about 80 g, double-sided QQ.
  At first, I was confused because I didn't know how to hit it, but when I made a strong impact, it showed its true value.
  The momentum is light but sufficient, and the ball is released very quickly enough to give enough momentum to the middle to apse.
  However, with a light hit, there is almost no shot feeling and it is difficult to control and rotate.
  However, with regard to strong swing techniques such as loop drive and cut, rotation is applied without problems and it is within the range that can be controlled.
  Rabbits have a weaker shot feeling than other soft outerwear (ALC series, etc.), so I had the impression that the ball would run and stabilize if I could be aware of the impact.

  The feeling of use is similar to Yasaka's Arnade and Tamasu's Jun Mizutani, but I think the point of this racket is that it is much lighter than that. The momentum is also perfect.
  I felt very good when I went to the third ball in the fore, but when I connected it in the back, the impact was not enough and I often made a net mistake.
  Recommended for players who mainly play the third ball or who are confident in the impact of both hands and who want both speed and lightness.

  See original review Hide original review

  80ｇ程度の軽量個体、両面ＱＱでのレビューです。
  最初のうちは打ち方がわからず戸惑いながらでしたが、強めにインパクトした時真価を発揮しました。
  弾みは軽量でありながら十分で、中陣～後陣でも十分に勢いを出せるほど球離れも非常に早いです。
  しかし、軽打では打球感がほぼ無くコントロールや回転に関しては難しいです。
  ただし、ループドライブやカットなどの強くスイングする技術に関しては問題なく回転も掛かり、コントロールもできる範囲になります。
  兎に角、他柔らかめアウター系（ＡＬＣ系など）と比べると強く打たなければ打球感が薄いのでしっかりインパクトを意識できると球が走る＆安定するという印象でした。

  使用感は別メーカーでいうとヤサカのアルネイドや、タマスの水谷隼が近いですがそれに比べて非常に軽量な点がこのラケットのポイントかと思います。弾みも申し分ありません。
  自分はフォアで3球目行く時は非常に好感触でしたが、バックでつなぐ時はインパクトが足らずネットミスすることもしばしば・・・。
  3球目主体のプレイヤーや、両ハンドのインパクトに自信のあるプレイヤーでスピードと軽さ、両方を求める方におすすめです。

  2021/12/23

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Q QUALITY

  Recommend rubber（Back） Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  OMEGA VII ASIA

  

  It is a very easy-to-use piece.
  The impression that you can make a firm impact even if you rub it slightly with a sheet that has a biting feeling like XIOM's rubber.
  The ball is moderately rough and the control is effective, and the arc line is low, but a powerful straight ball goes.

  However, the characteristics of OMEGA, which has a taut feeling and is easy to tip, remained the same. At the time of blocking, if it was a block to hold down when returning a strong ball, it fell and went straight to the net. It seems that it is necessary to block back against a strong ball.

  Except for that one point, I think it is a fairly high-performance rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  非常に扱いやすい一枚です。
  XIOMのラバーらしい噛みつく感覚があるシートでやや擦り打ちしてもしっかりインパクトできる印象。
  球も程よく荒れたりしながらコントロールも効き、弧線は低めですが威力のある直線的なボールがいきます。

  ただし、シートがピンッと張っている感がありチップしやすいオメガの特徴はそのままでした。ブロックの際、強烈なボールを返す時に抑えるブロックだと落ちてネットに直行しました。強いボールに対してはかけ返すブロックをする必要がありそうです。

  その一点を除けばかなり高性能のラバーだと思います。

  2020/11/26

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket STRADIVARIUS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >