NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• SUPER VENTUS

  

  It is a well-balanced rubber in all.
  It is characterized by high arch lines such as tenergy, and it is also interesting that the characteristics change depending on the combination with the racket.
  If you combine it with carbon, you can hit a heavy ball, and if you combine it with wood, it will not fly too much and it will be easy to handle.
  To put it the other way around, the impression will change depending on the combination, so it may be better to consider a racket when using it.

  The price is reasonable and the performance is high, but the drawback is the weight. If it is extra thick, it will exceed 50g after cutting, so be careful when pasting it on both sides.

  See original review Hide original review

  全てにおいてバランスの良いラバーです。
  テナジー等にある高い弧線が特徴でラケットとの組み合わせで特徴が変わってくる面白さもあります。
  カーボン系に組み合わせれば重い球が打てますし、木材系に組み合わせれば飛びすぎず扱いやすい印象になります。
  逆を言えば組み合わせで印象が変わってしまうので使う際にはラケットも検討した方が良いかもしれません。

  値段も手ごろで高性能ですが、欠点を挙げるとするなら重量でしょうか。特厚だとカット後50g越えなので両面に貼る場合は注意が必要です。

  2020/11/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  MK carbon

  

  First, my conclusion: I felt that this outer racket had a harder feel and control performance that was different from the Tamas ALC.

  What really stands out is the feel of the ball.
  The ALC is characterized by a soft, "posh" or "mushy" feel, or to put it negatively, a muffled feel when hitting the ball.
  The MK Carbon had a firmer, "click" or "crackle" feel when hitting the ball, and was refreshing.
  The feel of the ball is closer to the ZLC, but it feels like the feel of the ball resonates all the way to your hand.
  The ball retention is also special, and I feel that it holds the ball as well as or better than the ALC.

  I also felt that the flight distance and controllability were also unique.
  The flight distance itself is great, but thanks to the feeling of gripping it, it spins and settles on the table.
  I think that while it doesn't have as much flight distance as the ZLC, it has improved control.
  I also felt that it was easier to spin compared to the ALC, so the drive type and other rackets fit well on the table and were easy to operate.

  Overall Review
  For those who don't like the feel of the ALC but find it difficult to hit the ball as far as the ZLC
  For those new to outer rackets
  For those who want a racket that allows them to be aware of the flex
  For those who want a lighter racket (average 84g)

  Recommended for those who fall into the above category.

  See original review Hide original review

  まずは結論ですが、タマスALCとは違う硬めの打球感＆コントロール性能を備えたアウターラケットと感じました。

  特出しているのは打球感。
  ALCは「ポシュッ」「モサッ」みたいな柔らかい、悪く言うとこもっている打球感が特徴です。
  MKカーボンは「カチッ」「パキッ」という固めで爽快な打球感でした。
  どちらかというと打球感はZLC寄りで、しかし手まで打球感が響く感じがします。
  また球持ちも特殊でALCと同等以上に球持ちが良いと感じます。

  飛距離、コントロール性も特徴があると感じました。
  飛距離自体は飛ぶんですが、掴む感覚があるお陰で回転で台に収まります。
  ZLCよりは飛距離が出ない代わりにコントロール性が向上していると思います。
  また、ALCと比べても自分は回転が掛けやすいと感じたのでドライブ系等は台の収まりが良く操作性が良いと感じました。

  総評
  ALCの打球感は苦手だけどZLCのようなぶっ飛びは難しいという方
  アウター入門の方
  しなりを意識できるラケットが欲しい方
  軽めのラケットが欲しい方（平均84g）

  上記のような方にお勧めです。

  2024/07/19

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） HYBRID MK PRO

  Recommend rubber（Back） HYBRID MK

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID AIM

  

  I bought this because it was the outer version of the Solid Pro made by the same company, and I thought the taste was quite different.
  The Solid Pro had a strong wood feel, but this one brings out the texture of the material.
  However, it is not a hard hitting feel like carbon, but a slightly softer hitting feel.

  The distance was longer than the Solid Pro, and the fast pitch play in the front court was also good, so I thought it would be especially good for players who play in the front to middle court.

  Before buying it, I was imagining something like the Timo Bolls Spark, but the Solid Aim is easy to use because it has a standard board thickness of 6 mm.
  (The Timo Bolls Spark is 5.4 mm.)
  The hitting feel is also mild due to the board thickness.

  It has performance that can handle anything well, so I don't think you can choose a rubber.
  The weight is also light on average like the Solid Pro, so you should be able to match it to your level and the rubber that you like.

  It's more docile than carbon, so it's recommended for those who play in the front to middle of the court, or for those looking to step up from a wooden racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  同社製ソリッドプロのアウター版とのことで購入しましたが、かなりテイストが違うなと思いました。
  ソリッドプロは木材の感覚が強かったですが、こちらは素材感を十分に出してくれています。
  かといってカーボンのような硬い打球感ではなくやや柔らかめの打球感が特徴です。

  飛距離はソリッドプロより出ていましたし、前陣でピッチの早い弾くプレーも好感触で、前～中陣で戦うプレイヤーにとっては特に良いのかなと思いました。

  買う前はティモボルスパークのようなのを想像していましたが、
  ソリッドエイムは板厚が6㎜で標準的板厚の為使いやすさがありました。
  （ティモボルスパークは5.4㎜だそうです）
  打球感も板厚の分マイルドです。

  性能も何でもそつなくこなせる系なので、ラバーを選ばないと思います。
  重量もソリッドプロと同じく平均が軽めなので、自分のレベルや好きな打球感のラバーを合わせていける筈です。

  カーボンと比べたら大人しいので前～中陣で戦う方や、木材寄りのラケットからのステップアップなど、
  そういった方々にお勧めです。

  2024/07/19

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） DIGNICS 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  OMEGA VII ASIA

  

  It is a very easy-to-use piece.
  The impression that you can make a firm impact even if you rub it slightly with a sheet that has a biting feeling like XIOM's rubber.
  The ball is moderately rough and the control is effective, and the arc line is low, but a powerful straight ball goes.

  However, the characteristics of OMEGA, which has a taut feeling and is easy to tip, remained the same. At the time of blocking, if it was a block to hold down when returning a strong ball, it fell and went straight to the net. It seems that it is necessary to block back against a strong ball.

  Except for that one point, I think it is a fairly high-performance rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  非常に扱いやすい一枚です。
  XIOMのラバーらしい噛みつく感覚があるシートでやや擦り打ちしてもしっかりインパクトできる印象。
  球も程よく荒れたりしながらコントロールも効き、弧線は低めですが威力のある直線的なボールがいきます。

  ただし、シートがピンッと張っている感がありチップしやすいオメガの特徴はそのままでした。ブロックの際、強烈なボールを返す時に抑えるブロックだと落ちてネットに直行しました。強いボールに対してはかけ返すブロックをする必要がありそうです。

  その一点を除けばかなり高性能のラバーだと思います。

  2020/11/26

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket STRADIVARIUS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  

  I felt that the shot feeling was good, I didn't feel the texture so much, and I felt that the surface material was close to the shot feeling of 5 plywood.
  I think it's close to Energy Wood V2.
  Still, the momentum can be blown like a material. It is inferior to carbon fiber, but it is enough if it is about the middle team.

  I heard that the weight is around 85g and there is not much individual difference, so it is very light, and if it is a combination of my own rubber (double-sided special thickness), I will cut 180g.

  I had the image that many darkers are thick and difficult to handle, but I'm glad that this is a general thickness.
  One point to note is that when combined with the adhesive tension system, the height of the rubber arch is added in addition to the height of the racket, making it extremely difficult to control + it becomes difficult to punch out, so I felt it was a little difficult to handle.
  I feel that it goes well with a straight tension rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  兎に角打球感が良く、素材感をあまり感じず、表面材が固めの5枚合板の打球感に近いと感じました。
  エナジーウッドV2とかに近いと思います。
  それでいて弾みは素材らしく飛ばせます。カーボン系には劣りますが中陣ぐらいなら十分です。

  重量も85ｇ前後であまり個体差もないと聞いたので非常に軽く、自分のラバー（両面特厚）の組み合わせなら180ｇを切ります。

  ダーカーは板厚が厚く扱いづらいものが多いイメージでしたが、これは一般的な厚さなのも嬉しい。
  一つ注意点としては粘着テンション系と組み合わせると、ラケットの弧線高さに加えてラバーの弧線高さが足されて制御が凄く難しくなる+打ち抜きづらくなるのでやや扱いが難しいと感じました。
  直線的なテンションラバーとの相性が良く感じます。

  2022/01/10

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >