NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• Ventus Spin

  

  I am using it in the back.
  It is a rubber with a sober impression compared to Super Ventus, but I think that it is a rubber with comprehensive power at a level comparable to that of Super Ventus.
  You can control it properly without flying too much, and you can apply rotation tightly.
  Although it is common to the Ventus series, it has good performance to lift up, and this rubber is also easy to hit down.

  The reason I use it in the back is because it is light in weight, but I think that there are not many rubbers that are so light with this performance.
  I think it would be good to use it for backhands of intermediate level and above, and forehands at the beginner-intermediate level.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックで使用しています。
  スーパーヴェンタスと比べて地味な印象のラバーですが、遜色ないレベルで総合力があるラバーだと思います。
  飛びすぎないのできちんとコントロールでき、かつ回転はガッツリかけることができます。
  ヴェンタスシリーズ共通ですが上に持ち上がる性能が良く、このラバーも例に漏れず下回転打ちがやりやすいです。

  自分がバックで使用している理由としては重量が軽いためですが、この性能でここまで軽いラバーはなかなかないと思います。
  中級者以上のバックハンド、初中級レベルでのフォアハンドでの採用がいいんじゃないかと私は思います。

  2020/11/23

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  DNA DRAGON GRIP〈55°〉

  

  The first impression was a hard rubber that didn't rotate and flew moderately.
  However, as you use it many times, the impression changes greatly and you think it is the best rubber.

  On the first day like a certain adhesive rubber, the sheet was too sticky and the sheet was too hard and the feeling was bad and the bite was bad.
  However, as it was used, the sheet began to bite into it, and the rubber became a rubber with a change peculiar to adhesive + momentum.
  If you value the feeling of hitting the sheet and sponge, you can produce a powerful ball and a high-quality connecting ball with many rotations.

  I think that it is a rubber that can be transformed by diligent storage method and maintenance, so it is recommended to use it for about a month without looking at it on the first day. (Measures against humidity, warming rubber with a warmer to soften it, etc.)
  Especially recommended for bags.

  See original review Hide original review

  第一印象は回転は掛からずそこそこ飛ぶ硬いラバーでした。
  しかし、何度も使用していくうちに印象が大きく変わり最高のラバーと思うように。

  某粘着ラバーのように初日はシートの粘着あり過ぎやシートが硬すぎて感覚が悪かったり食い込みが悪かったりでした。
  しかし、使い込んでいくとシートが食い込むようになり粘着特有の変化が出る+弾みがあるラバーになりました。
  打ち方をシートとスポンジに食い込ませて持つ感覚を大事にすれば、威力のある球も回転の多い質の高い繋ぎのボールも出せます。

  保管方法、メンテナンスをこまめにすることで化けるラバーだと思いますので初日で見限らず1か月ほど使い込んでみることをお勧めします。（湿気対策やラバーをカイロで温めて柔らかくするなど）
  特にバックにお勧めです。

  2022/02/18

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  Q QUALITY

  

  It is harder and more manual than Tenergy, but it gives the impression that a sharp ball comes out when hit hard.
  The shot feeling is similar to that of MX-D, but I think the best feature is that it is light at around 47g after the extra-thick cut.
  Although the arc line of the hit ball is low, it does not fall, and a ball with sharp rotation and speed can be hit, and there is a sense of stability.
  It is recommended to use it for the fore when combined with the outer, but I think that impact is necessary because I feel the hardness with the back.
  It had a good reputation as a front to middle rubber, but if you choose a racket to combine, you can get enough power even in the apse, so I feel that it is a rubber that matches various layers.

  Also, I think that inner + QQ is likely to become popular in the future as much as an iron plate.
  Above all, I think that the point of reasonable price and light weight is an intermediate level trend, so it will be a rubber that will be seen more in the future.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジーよりも硬さやマニュアル感がありますが、強打時は鋭いボールが出る印象があります。
  MX-Dに近い打球感ですがこちらは特厚カット後47ｇ前後で軽いのが一番の特徴かと思います。
  打球の弧線低いものの落ちることはなく、鋭く回転の掛かったスピードのあるボールが打て、安定感有。
  アウターとの組み合わせだとフォアに使うのがおすすめです、バックだと硬さを感じるのでインパクトが必要だと思います。
  前～中陣ラバーという前評判でしたが、組み合わせるラケットを選べば後陣でも十分な威力を出せたので色んな層にマッチするラバーと感じます。

  また自分はインナー+ＱＱは鉄板というくらいに今後流行りそうだなと思っています。
  何より良心的値段＆軽量という点は中級レベルのトレンドだと思うので、今後はより見かけることになるラバーでしょう。

  2021/12/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ALTIUS OUTER

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Aqua SELAS CNF

  

  In addition to the soft feel of hitting, there is also a firm feeling of reverberation in the hand, and the texture is almost unnoticeable + cypress.
  However, the momentum and grip are excellent, and while you can control it well, you can exert power even from the apse.

  There is no problem with any combination of rubber, but if it is sticky, it feels too high or too long.
  On the contrary, adhesive is recommended for those who want to hold it firmly and rotate it.

  The grip is the usual darker grip, so there is no particular feature. A slightly thick impression.

  The overall balance was good, but the momentum was strong, and the feel of the ball was very pleasant.

  See original review Hide original review

  柔らかい打感に加え、手に響く感覚もしっかりとあり、素材感はほぼ感じさせない+檜感有。
  しかし、弾みと掴みは素晴らしくコントロールがしっかりできつつも後陣からでも威力を出していけます。

  ラバーについてはどんな組み合わせでも問題ない感覚がありますが、粘着だと上がり過ぎる感や持ちすぎる感もありました。
  逆にガッチリ持って回転かけたい人は粘着おすすめです。

  グリップはいつものダーカーグリップなので特に特徴ありません。やや太めの印象。

  全体的にバランスが良いながらも弾みが強く、打感が非常に気持ちいい一本でした。

  2021/12/24

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） Q QUALITY

  Recommend rubber（Back） Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  MK carbon

  

  First, my conclusion: I felt that this outer racket had a harder feel and control performance that was different from the Tamas ALC.

  What really stands out is the feel of the ball.
  The ALC is characterized by a soft, "posh" or "mushy" feel, or to put it negatively, a muffled feel when hitting the ball.
  The MK Carbon had a firmer, "click" or "crackle" feel when hitting the ball, and was refreshing.
  The feel of the ball is closer to the ZLC, but it feels like the feel of the ball resonates all the way to your hand.
  The ball retention is also special, and I feel that it holds the ball as well as or better than the ALC.

  I also felt that the flight distance and controllability were also unique.
  The flight distance itself is great, but thanks to the feeling of gripping it, it spins and settles on the table.
  I think that while it doesn't have as much flight distance as the ZLC, it has improved control.
  I also felt that it was easier to spin compared to the ALC, so the drive type and other rackets fit well on the table and were easy to operate.

  Overall Review
  For those who don't like the feel of the ALC but find it difficult to hit the ball as far as the ZLC
  For those new to outer rackets
  For those who want a racket that allows them to be aware of the flex
  For those who want a lighter racket (average 84g)

  Recommended for those who fall into the above category.

  See original review Hide original review

  まずは結論ですが、タマスALCとは違う硬めの打球感＆コントロール性能を備えたアウターラケットと感じました。

  特出しているのは打球感。
  ALCは「ポシュッ」「モサッ」みたいな柔らかい、悪く言うとこもっている打球感が特徴です。
  MKカーボンは「カチッ」「パキッ」という固めで爽快な打球感でした。
  どちらかというと打球感はZLC寄りで、しかし手まで打球感が響く感じがします。
  また球持ちも特殊でALCと同等以上に球持ちが良いと感じます。

  飛距離、コントロール性も特徴があると感じました。
  飛距離自体は飛ぶんですが、掴む感覚があるお陰で回転で台に収まります。
  ZLCよりは飛距離が出ない代わりにコントロール性が向上していると思います。
  また、ALCと比べても自分は回転が掛けやすいと感じたのでドライブ系等は台の収まりが良く操作性が良いと感じました。

  総評
  ALCの打球感は苦手だけどZLCのようなぶっ飛びは難しいという方
  アウター入門の方
  しなりを意識できるラケットが欲しい方
  軽めのラケットが欲しい方（平均84g）

  上記のような方にお勧めです。

  2024/07/19

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） HYBRID MK PRO

  Recommend rubber（Back） HYBRID MK

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >