NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Cool Max (Experience: １１〜２０ years) A milder version of Tenergy 05 with a higher arc

  

  The arc is also on the high side, giving your topspin drive good stability.
  Short serves, maybe because of how soft the topsheet is, don't stay short and cut well. Long serves are also mediocre.

  See original review Hide original review

  弧線も高めでドライブの安定感がある。
  短いサーブがシートの柔らかさからか短く切れない。ロングサーブも今一つ。

  2018/09/11

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer · ZLC-CS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  zxcvbnm (Experience: ６〜１０ years) A rubber focused on stability and spin, mainly for close-to-mid distance play

  

  I was using the 1.9mm version.
  Max power on hard hits and max spin when really ripping the ball fall short of the MX-P, but even with imperfect form or medium/light hits, it still gets solid spin and the ball goes into the opponent's court stably.

  As above, speed is on the modest side, so for smashes and angled shots you should really aim your course carefully.
  Against backspin, your topspin drive gets solid spin and lifts the ball up well, and against topspin, you can hit back without losing to the opponent's ball.
  This might partly be down to my own skill, but I felt it was hard to land the ball in the opponent's court when standing more than 3m from the table, so if you're going to make this your main rubber, it's better to play close-to-the-table to mid-distance, up to about 2m from the table.
  For pushes and stops, the ball tends to float up a little, but on the plus side it lands in the court stably because of that.
  Also, even after about 3 months of playing twice a week for a total of 4-5 hours a week, I didn't feel any real drop in performance at all.

  It's a good rubber that emphasizes stability and spin — playable by anyone from a somewhat experienced beginner and up.

  See original review Hide original review

  1.9mmを使用していました。
  強打の最大威力、ぶつぎったときの最大回転量はMX-Pには劣りますが、体勢不十分や中軽打のときでもしっかりと回転がかかり安定して相手コートにボールが入ってくれます。

  上記の通りスピードに関しては控えめですので、スマッシュや角度打ちはコースをしっかり狙って打った方がよいでしょう。
  対下回転に対するドライブはしっかり回転がかかって持ち上がり、対上回転のドライブも相手の球に負けることなく打ち返すことが可能です。
  私の腕のせいもありますが、台から離れて3m以上だと相手コートに入りにくいと感じたため、このラバーを主戦とする場合は台から2mくらいまで、前～中陣で戦った方がよいでしょう。
  ツッツキ、ストップに関してはやや球が浮きやすいかな?という感じですが、その分安定してコートに入るという利点もあります。
  また週2回、週卓球時間計4~5Hを3か月程度続けても特に性能が劣化したとは全く感じませんでした。

  安定性と回転を重視しているいいラバーです、ある程度卓球慣れした初級者以上のレベルなれば扱えるでしょう。

  2018/09/02

  All	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  Raspai (Experience: ４〜５ years) Soft but powerful

  

  This is an interesting rubber.
  I used it on my forehand, and even when my form broke down a bit, good spinny balls still went in.
  It's similar to Butterfly's 05, but since it's softer than that, I'd describe it as like the 80 with a higher arc.
  Speed on a light hit: 05 = EL-P < 80
  Speed on a hard hit: 80 ≤ EL-P ≤ 05
  Spin on a light hit: 05 ≤ 80 ≤ EL-P
  Spin on a hard hit: 80 = EL-P < 05
  Height of the arc: 80 < EL-P ≤ 05

  See original review Hide original review

  面白いラバーですね。
  フォアで使ったのですが、多少体制が崩れても回転の乗ったいい球が入っていきます。
  蝶社の05と似ていますが、それより柔らかいため80の弧線を高くした感じという表現が適切かなと。
  軽打でのスピード　05=ELP<80
  強打でのスピード　80≦ELP≦05
  軽打での回転　　　05≦80≦ELP
  強打での回転　　　80=ELP<05
  弧線の高さ　　　　80<ELP≦05

  2018/08/05

  All	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use LIU Shiwen ZLF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  26

• 

  Alexandra (Experience: ６〜１０ years) Between Tenergy 05 and 05 FX

  

  The sponge hardness is 45 degrees, so as advertised it comes out to medium hardness.
  The topsheet is hard, so overall it's harder than Rozena.

  Spin performance is extremely high — I felt it's comparable to Tenergy 05.
  The order goes 05 FX < EL-P < 05, and it's very easy to use.

  Among Tenergy-alike rubbers, I felt this one's performance was head and shoulders above the rest.

  See original review Hide original review

  スポンジ硬度が45度なので、性能通りミドル硬度になります。
  シートが硬い為、ロゼナよりは硬いです。

  回転性能は非常に高く、テナジー05に匹敵すると感じました。
  05FX＜EL-P＜05　となっており、とても使いやすいです。

  テナジー類似品の中ではダントツの性能だと感じました。

  2018/07/31

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

• 

  Hikuru [Chinese style penholder] (Experience: ２〜３ years) Red sponge looks cool

  

  Used 2.1mm thickness on the forehand of a Chinese penhold racket.

  Topspin drive... extremely stable. The arc is high too, and the ball zips and stretches once it's over the table.

  Against backspin drives... it lifts the ball up easily.
  Even hitting a speed drive, it's easy to lift the ball up.

  Serves... easy to vary the amount of spin and the length. That said, it doesn't spin on its own — if you can't put the spin on yourself, you'll get hit hard right away.

  Blocks... a bit tricky. But if you block with a bit of wrist, pushing the ball, you can counter back at tremendous speed.

  Short game... since this rubber is easily affected by spin, everything except the flick is easy to do. Compared to other rubbers, it falls into the easier category.

  Receive... you can overwrite the opponent's spin, so you can dominate the point.

  I've been singing its praises, but it really is a great rubber, so if you're not sure what to get, you won't regret buying this — please give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  中ペンのフォアに2.1を使用。

  ドライブ…すごく安定する。弧線も高く、台の中でギュン！と伸びる。

  対下回転ドライブ…簡単に持ち上がる。
  スピードドライブを打っても簡単に持ち上げられる。

  サーブ…回転の強弱、長さの長短がつけやすい。ただ、勝手にかかるわけではなく、自分でかけることができないとすぐに強打される。

  ブロック…少しやりにくい。ただ、少し手首を使って押す感じでブロックすると、ものすごい速さでカウンターが入る。

  台上技術…回転の影響を受けやすいラバーなのでフリック以外やりやすい。他のラバーと比べるとやりやすい部類に入る。

  レシーブ…回転上書きできるのでプレーを支配できる。

  褒めちぎってますがホントにいいラバーなので何にしようか迷っている方、買って損はしないのでぜひ買ってみてください。

  2018/05/19

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Sughi (Experience: More than ２０ years) Well-balanced rubber for any impact strength, but MX-P wins on raw numbers

  

  I picked out a fairly heavy unit in the store.
  As it stands, compared to a soft off-the-shelf Tenergy 05, this one gives more speed with about the same amount of spin. If anything, on a strong impact the spin feels just a tiny bit higher…
  It's a rubber that makes it easy both to blow through the ball in one shot and to keep a rally going.
  My guess is that the Evolution series is basically the 2008 version of Tenergy 05 with a thicker topsheet, reproducing the coarser-bubble spring sponge from back then.
  It makes sense that people whisper that the Evolution is on a different level from the rest.
  Back then, the tension agent in Tenergy caught on the racket control, so from the 2009 domestically produced Tenergy 64 onward, they probably switched to today's fine-bubble spring sponge and boosted the bounce as a minor update.
  This is spot-on for anyone who can't forget that sinking-in feel of the old Tenergy 05 and 64 from back then.

  Points to watch out for: it's a slightly more demanding rubber to handle than the old Tenergy, and it's just as heavy as the old Tenergy — it could go over 50g.
  Because the topsheet on this generation of German spin rubbers is thicker, if your swing is too slow to deform the pips when you hit, the ball will come off slow with basically no spin at all.
  Choose your rubber carefully.

  See original review Hide original review

  店頭にてかなり重たい個体を選んで見ました。
  現状、柔らかい個体の市販品のテナジー05よりスピード出てスピンはほぼ同等。むしろ強いインパクトでは回転量がほんの少しだけ上な気がする…。
  一撃で抜くことも繋ぐことも容易なラバーですね。
  恐らく、2008年度版テナジー05をシート厚めにして、当時の気泡の粗いスプリングスポンジを再現した物がエボリューションシリーズなのでしょう。
  エボリューションだけ別格と囁かれるのも頷けます。
  当時のテナジーはテンション剤がラケットコントロールに引っ掛かる為、2009年度版の国内生産テナジー64以降は現在の細かな気泡のスプリングスポンジに変更し弾みを上げて、マイナーチェンジしたのでしょう。
  あの当時のテナジー05、64の食い込み感覚が忘れられない人にはドンピシャッですね。

  注意する点は当時のテナジーよりも少しだけマニュアルなラバーになっている事と当時のテナジーと同等に重いです。50gを超える可能性があります。
  この世代のドイツスピン系からシートが厚くなっている為、粒を変形させて打てない程の遅いスイングだと、遅くて全く回転がのらない事になります。
  しっかりとラバーを選びましょう。

  2018/04/16

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  17

• 

  Bird head (Experience: Less than a year) Spin?

  

  I switched to the EL-P because I wanted more ball dwell time, but if you're just looking at that, Rakza X is actually better.
  Spin-wise, the EL-P is better, I think.
  With topspin drives, it feels like there isn't much spin on the ball, but there actually is, surprisingly.
  I might be giving the wrong impression here, but it's actually a really good rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  僕は、球持ちがほしくてEL-Pにしましたが、球持ちだけでみるとラクザXのほうがいいですね。
  回転はEL-Pのほうがいいです。たぶん。
  ドライブは、かかっていないように感じますが意外とかかってます。
  悪印象を与えているかもしれませんが、かなりいいラバーです。

  2018/03/18

  All	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use WANOKIWAMI REN OFF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Evolution FX-P
• 
  Evolution MX-P
• 
  Quantum X PRO
• 
  1Q