NO.1 table tennis review site

User reviews

• 

  katsuo000 （Experience：More than ２０ years） Superb destructive power of flying

  

  It is a flying racket feels that it is extremely close to the hit feeling when using old rubber and old organic solvents.
  The sharpness of driving and meat running method, sharpness when entering the partner's coat is outstanding, I think that this price is useless for this super destructive power.
  On the other hand, I think that receiving and tabletop are fairly delicate, and I think that it is necessary to practice mainly the flick, which is similar to the speed of the hit point, the bush nature and the stop, and the flick close to the aggressive meat rather than spinning. Or you can float, so if you can not play like putting it back from the blocking game first, I think that I will not make it easily because I lost points on the battle and receive.
  Rubber is not that we can not use stickiness, but because it becomes sensitive to the opponent's rotation, I think that the tension rubber is easier to handle both for the foreback and the racket's characteristics will be useful.
  Why do not you take the speed craziness you want to overwhelm with super destructive power by all means?

  See original review Hide original review

  已打底ありのラバーや、昔の有機溶剤を使った時の打感に極めて近いと感じるぶっ飛びラケットです。
  ドライブやミート打ちの走り方、相手のコートに入っるときの鋭角さは抜群で、この超破壊力のためにはこの価格は仕方ないと思います。
  一方で、レシーブや台上がかなり繊細で、回転をかけるよりは打点の速さやブッシュ性のツッツキやストップ、攻撃的なミートに近いフリックを主として練習をやり込む必要があると思います。または浮いてもいいからまずは入れてブロッキングゲームから巻き返すようなプレーが出来ないと、台上やレシーブで失点して持ち味がなかなか出さないと思います。
  ラバーも、粘着が使えないわけではないんですが、相手の回転に敏感になるので、フォアバックどちらもテンションラバーの方が扱いやすさもあってラケットの特性が活きると思います。
  超破壊力で圧倒したいスピード狂は是非一度手にとってみてはいかがでしょうか。

  2017/10/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Touch	6
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) NEO HURRICANE 3

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  181

• 

  Apurisan （Experience：６〜１０ years） Recommended for those who like a hard shot feel

  

  This is one of Butterfly's ultra-luxury rackets.

  
  As a comparison with Jun Mizutani ZLC x double-sided Dignics 80

  
  ・I felt that the shot was harder than the Hayabusa Mizutani ZLC (hereinafter referred to as ZLC). When I hit it hard, it felt almost like a wooden spoon, which I personally found very comfortable.

  ・Compared to ZLC, it is more difficult to control serves and table processing, and practice is required to avoid overshooting.

  ・The connecting backhand was much easier than ZLC.

  ・I don't feel like losing when it comes to inquiries. Furthermore, the backhand is also more stable, making it much easier to hit than the ZLC.

  -The ball of the racket itself is released quickly, and the rubber used is Dignics 64, so slow rotation can be ignored to some extent. On the other hand, it is difficult to do intense Tsutsuki, so I felt that it was less versatile than the ZLC.

  That was a simple comparison.

  
  I thought this racket was packed with elements that would help players with weaker muscles win against players with stronger muscles.

  
  It is a gem of a level that I think there is nothing more amazing than this if you use it properly.

  
  If you are interested, we recommend purchasing it early and practicing as much as possible.

  See original review Hide original review

  バタフライの超高級ラケットの1枚です。

  
  水谷隼ZLC×両面ディグニクス80との比較として

  
  ・水谷隼ZLC(以下ZLC)よりも打球感が硬く感じました。強打する時は木べらに近いような感覚で、個人的には心地よかったです。

  ・ZLCに比べサーブや台上処理のコントロールが難しく、オーバーしないための練習が必要です。

  ・繋ぐバックハンドがZLCよりもかなり楽でした。

  ・引き合いにおいては負ける気がしません。さらにバックハンドも安定するためZLCよりもかなり楽に打ち合えます。

  ・ラケット自体の球離れが早く、使用したラバーもディグニクス64ということもあり、緩い回転ならある程度無視できます。逆に強烈なツッツキなどは難しいため、ZLCよりも汎用性に劣るかなと感じました。

  以上、簡単な比較でした。

  
  筋力の弱い選手が筋力の強い選手に勝つための要素が詰まったラケットだと思いました。

  
  使いこなせばこれ以上にすごいものはないと思うレベルの逸品です。

  
  興味のある方は早めに購入して多くの練習を積むことをオススメします。

  2023/09/12

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) DIGNICS 64

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) DIGNICS 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  20

• 

  ball crusher （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Large meat spot

  

  The speed, the height of the arc, and the power of the ball are perfect.
  It's hard to keep up with the bouncing, but the drive is quick and the ball doesn't go straight.
  Ball separation is as fast as zlc
  If you get used to it, the strongest racket.

  See original review Hide original review

  スピード、弧線の高さ、球の威力は申し分ない。
  弾む分緩急はつけにくが、とにかくドライブが早く、意外にボールが直線的にいかない。
  球離れはzlcと同じくらいの速さ
  慣れたら最強ラケット。

  2020/01/19

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) NEO HURRICANE 3

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Tenergy 05 FX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  22

• 

  Pons （Experience：１１〜２０ years） [Overall rating] Choose a racket to use (Table user recommended)

  

  Currently I use the normal Mizutani Kei ZLC, but I purchase the SURPER ZLC that I want to improve the power with the same shot feel.

  Feeling at impact: Normal ZLC is suitable for outerwear, but there is also a tendency to "turn", but SURPER ZLC is considerably stiff due to the doubling of special material. Jumping out after hitting was quick too, and it was a feeling that it was lacking in the sense of putting on rotation. The only thing that was good was that it was the "sweet spot" with the same impetus for any area of the racket.

  ■ Compatibility with rubber: I used 05, but it was too stiff to use SURPER ZLC and it was not possible to use it at all honestly because it was brand new. Therefore, I felt that it was so easy to be surprised if I hit it at 80, so I thought it would be easier to hit it with FX series, 64, and Rosena.

  ■ Summary

  ・ Because the racket itself is very far off the ball, people who are weak are facing
  ・ Especially for front users because it is hard and bouncy
  ・ It is easy to demonstrate the performance of the racket itself if it is pasted FX system
  ・ It seems that it is unsuitable for hard hitter (I can not convey the feeling of hitting anyway)

  See original review Hide original review

  現在ノーマル水谷隼ZLCを使っていますが、同じ打球感で威力をアップさせたくSURPER ZLCを購入。

  ■打球感：ノーマルZLCの方はアウターながら適度に「しなり」もあり回転が掛けやすいですが、SURPER ZLCは特殊素材の編み込みが2倍のせいか相当硬かったです。当たってからの飛び出しも早く、回転を掛ける感覚に乏しい感じでした。ただ良かった点としてラケットのどのエリアに当てても同じ弾みで全てが「スイートスポット」でした。

  ■ラバーとの相性：05を使っていますが、新品の張りたてでSURPER ZLCを使うと硬すぎて正直全く使えなかったです。その為、80にして打ったらビックリするくらい打ちやすかったのでFXシリーズや64、ロゼナにするともっと打ちやすいような気はしました。

  ■まとめ

  ・ラケット自体が非常に球離れが良いので非力な人のほうが向いてる
  ・硬くて弾むので特に表ユーザー向き
  ・FX系を貼ったほうがラケットそのものの性能を発揮しやすい
  ・ハードヒッターに不向きかと思われます（とにかく打球感が伝わらない）

  2019/04/19

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	6
  Control	6
  Touch	6
  Hardness	hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Makochin （Experience：More than ２０ years） fast! !

  

  The best racket to buy in the era of cell balls! I thought, but it became quite a difficult racket after becoming plastic balls.
  When I hit it after a long time, a very fast ball went and I easily hit it. It felt like it would return if I hit a block.
  However, receive uses nerves.
  It may be difficult to control when you win a game.

  See original review Hide original review

  セルボールの時代に購は最高のラケット！と思ってましたが、プラボールになってからかなり難しいラケットになりました。
  久しぶりに打ってみたらすごく速いボールが行き、簡単に打ち抜けました。ブロックも当てれば返るみたいな感じでした。
  ただし、レシーブは神経を使います。
  試合でビビった時にはコントロールが難しいかもしれません。

  2019/04/16

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	9
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Tenergy 05 FX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  TAXS （Experience：６〜１０ years） It changes greatly depending on the combination

  

  It is a racket which makes a completely different face depending on the combination of rubber. At first I was Fosterk G1 as a forerunner, but the drive did not stabilize so much and there was that it should be over although it should be spinning. However, when I changed to Tenazi 05 FX, it was stable enough to feel that there was no hole in the drive, block, counter, etc. although there was some discomfort of the shot feeling. Perhaps the one who has power is hard rubber and those who do not have confidence think soft rubber is good.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラバーの組み合わせ次第で全く違う顔をするラケットです。最初はファスタークG1をフォアにしていましたが、ドライブがあまり安定せず、回転がかかっているはずなのにオーバーするということがありました。しかし、テナジー05FXに変えてみると打球感の不快感は多少あるもののドライブ、ブロック、カウンターなどに穴がないと感じるくらい安定しました。おそらくパワーがある方は硬いラバーで自信の無い方は柔らかいラバーが良いと思います。

  2018/12/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	6
  Touch	6
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) Tenergy 05 FX

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) OMEGA V EURO

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  tenergy got （Experience：Less than a year） Pretty hard for advanced users

  

  It is Mr. Mizutani's model racket. It may be due to rubber but rotation performance is low. However, I think that the control speed is good. Although it is a racket that exceeds 30,000 yen, please try using it.

  See original review Hide original review

  水谷先生のモデルのラケットです。ラバーのせいかもしれませんが回転性能が低いです。しかし、コントロール　スピードが良いと思います。３万円を超えるラケットですが使ってみてください。

  2018/10/08

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	5
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) Mark V

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) NANO SPINⅡ CHARISMA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. Next >

Related racket

• 
  Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC
• 
  Kenta Matsudaira ALC
• 
  Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce SUPER ALC
• 
  Innerforce Layer AL