NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Konkurimu (Experience: ２〜３ years) Spin and speed leave nothing to be desired

  

  The spin and speed are more than enough, but consistency is a bit lacking.
  The amount of spin on the third-ball attack is totally different depending on whether it lands or not, so you get overshoots and net misses.
  That said, when it does land, the spin is nasty, so I think it's better suited to players with power.
  I'd recommend putting it on the forehand side.
  You have to be a bit patient at first, but once the rubber breaks in it's really good, so I guess you need some perseverance with this one.

  See original review Hide original review

  回転、スピードは申し分ないが安定感がイマイチ。
  3球目が決まる時、決まらない時で全然球の回転が違うのでオーバーミス、ネットに引っかかるなどがあります。
  しかし、入った時の回転はぐろいのでパワーがある人が使ったほうがいいと思います。
  フォア面に貼ったほうがいいと思います。
  使い始めは少々我慢しないといけませんがラバー自体が馴染んでくるととてもいいので根気が必要かなぁなんて思います

  2017/03/27

  All	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Sakata (Experience: ６〜１０ years)

  

  For a tacky rubber it really flies. The power is high too, pretty much on par with Spin Art. Though Spin Art has more spin.

  See original review Hide original review

  粘着性のわりには飛びますねぇ。威力も高いしスピンアートとほぼ変わりませんね。回転はスピンアートの方が高いですけど。

  2017/03/25

  All	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Ma Long Carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Uni (Experience: ２〜３ years)

  

  The performance, price, and feel are all top-notch. I've been using Shoryu ever since it came out, so I've been using it for over a year now. Before that I used the SK7, and last month I bought a new Ma Lin Hard Carbon blade and put rubber on it. With the SK7 the ball felt kind of dull and mushy when I hit it, which I didn't like. So I'm glad I switched to the Ma Lin Hard Carbon (`・ω・)ゞ. Also, I personally really like Yasaka and wanted to unify my equipment with one maker. A lineup that's original yet priced for the average player is really attractive. The Ma Lin Hard Carbon, made of wenge and carbon, at 7500 yen is something other makers just can't match. I plan to keep using Shoryu going forward.

  See original review Hide original review

  性能、値段、打球感共に最高です。翔龍が発売されてからずっと使っていたので、私は翔龍を一年以上の間使い続けていることになります。以前はsk7、先月から馬琳ハードカーボンを新しく買って貼って使ってます。sk7だと打ってて球がモサッとしてて嫌だったんです。なので馬琳ハードカーボンに変えて良かったです(｀･ω･)ゞ。あと、個人的にヤサカがすごい好きでメーカー統一したいと思ってました。一般プレイヤー目線の値段でオリジナリティーも溢れるラインナップは魅力的ですよね。馬琳ハードカーボンもウェンジとカーボンで7500円は他のメーカーが真似できるものではないです。翔龍はこれからも使い続けていくつもりです。

  2017/03/18

  All	4/10
  Speed	3
  Spin	4
  Control	4
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use MA LIN HARD CARBON

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Sergei Harder than expected

  

  I thought it would lean more toward a tension rubber, but it's definitely tacky, and you really have to swing all the way through to get any spin, so it's totally a tacky rubber (lol). Still, it was refreshing how the ball flies out even with just a light touch.

  When you really smash it you get a straight ball, and when you brush it you get a wobbly, tricky ball.
  The range of ball quality is wide.
  The way the drive keeps its speed even when you hit hard from far back is something unique to this rubber.

  Personally, chopping was hard to do. When I received a hard hit, the ball flew further than expected.
  I think it's good for players who use their forehand purely for attacking rather than chopping. Pushes also had good spin, which was nice.
  Maybe it works for choppers who can always hit the ball thin...

  See original review Hide original review

  もっとテンションラバー寄りだと思っていましたが、粘着はしっかりありますし、振り切らないと回転が掛からないところなど、まるっきり粘着ラバーですね(笑)ただ当てただけでも飛び出していくところは新鮮でした。

  ぶったたいた時には直線的なボールが出せますし、引っかけて打つとうねるようなクセ球になります。
  球質の幅が広いです。
  下がったところから思いきり打つと失速せずドライブが飛んでいくところはこのラバーならではだと思います。

  個人的には、カットはやりにくかったです。強打を受けると思ったよりボールが飛んでしまいました。
  フォアはカットせず攻撃のみ、という方にはいいと思います。ツッツキもなかなか切れてよかったです。
  常に薄く当てられるカットマンなら使えるのかも・・・

  2017/03/08

  All	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use KORBEL

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Thompson (Experience: １１〜２０ years) Switched from a tension rubber

  

  I switched over from a tension rubber.

  The speed feels just like a tension rubber.
  If you really smack the ball and put spin on it, you get that wavy, biting topspin drive that's unique to tacky rubbers.

  But if you don't put enough spin on it, you end up with a surprisingly flat, straight ball.
  I think that shows the difficulty of tacky rubber.

  Stop and block were easier than with a regular tension rubber, and meet-hitting and countering felt easier too compared to other tacky rubbers like Hurricane.

  I think this is an interesting rubber that combines the good and bad points of both tension and tacky rubbers.

  See original review Hide original review

  テンションラバーから移行しました。

  スピードはまんまテンションラバーです。
  しっかりぶつけてかければ粘着特有のうねるようなドライブが打てます。

  ただ、しっかりかけないと、びっくりするような棒玉になってしまいます。
  そこは粘着の難しさが出ていると思います。

  ストップ、ブロックは従来のテンションラバーよりもやりやすく、ミート打ち、カウンターは、キョウヒョウ等の粘着と比べてもやりやすく感じました。

  テンションと粘着の良いところと悪いところが合わさった面白いラバーであると思います。

  2017/02/22

  All	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  41

• 

  Gorigori (Experience: ２〜３ years) Anyone can handle it

  

  This rubber can be used without trouble no matter what playing style you have!! That said, I think former tacky-rubber users will find it a bit lacking. In any case, using it on the forehand leaves no real weaknesses, so I'd recommend a backhand-focused blade!!

  See original review Hide original review

  このラバーはどの戦型の人も苦労せず、使うことができます‼ただ、元粘着userにはもの足りないと思います。とにかく、フォアで使えば弱点がないので、バック重視のラケットをオススメします‼

  2017/01/25

  All	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  STIGA maniac (Experience: １１〜２０ years) Best value for money, feels like a mix of tension and tacky

  

  It's a surprisingly bouncy rubber for something described as tacky, which makes table tennis fun to play.
  I think it occupies its own unique spot, a bit different from any rubber before it.
  The bite on serves, pushes, and stops leans tacky, but the way it flies feels more like a tension rubber. And best of all, the price is great.

  The downside is that it's harder to sustain topspin rallies compared to a tension rubber.
  Also, if your impact is weak and you just try to get the ball in, it comes out flat, so I think it does require a fair amount of skill.
  As for a blade to pair it with, avoid super fast ones — I think a more stable blade works better.

  See original review Hide original review

  粘着とは思えない、かなり弾むラバーなので卓球が面白いです。
  ちょっと今までのラバーとは違う独自のポジションだと思います。
  サーブやツッツキ、ストップの切れ味は粘着寄りなんですが、飛びはテンションという感じ。何より値段は◎です。

  デメリットはやはりテンションよりラリーを続けるのが難しいこと。
  それから、インパクトが弱くて、入れに行くと棒球になるので、技術力はまあまあいるかなと思います。
  合わせるラケットはぶっ飛び系はダメ、安定性の高いラケットが良いと思います。

  2017/01/12

  All	6/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	2
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 14
4. 15
5. 16
6. 17
7. 18
8. 19
9. 20
10. 21
11. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  RIGAN
• 
  X-Tend PO
• 
  Rakza X
• 
  TeruRyu