RIGAN

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Control and Spin to have excellent
RIGAN

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 8.7 / 10
  • 90 reviews
    • Speed:7.4
    • Spin:8.1
    • Control:9.26

    Reviews of RIGAN. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 9)

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    4,000 Yen(Include tax 4,400 Yen)
    Producer
    Yasaka
    Product code
    B-85
    Speed
    10+
    Spin
    12+
    Control
    11
    Hardness
    40 to 45

    Reviews by user

    • visitor

      COMPLEX (Experience:11〜20 years) Use it! Lol

      Reviews by user

      If you use it you will understand!
      It 's cheap and it' s cheap.
      Is it right to use it in the back? You know better if you use it than speaking here!
      Perhaps it will become a love that will be loved for a long time next to Yasaka's Mark V.

      See original review

      2019/02/28
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Gamma Knight (Experience:11〜20 years) It is not for beginners!

      Reviews by user

      It is not for beginners as everyone says! Normally you can get outstanding goodness even for intermediate and advanced players.
      First of all, since rotation is better than rosetzna around, rotation is more than normal and playing is strong, so speed comes out as well. Rather, depending on how you use the racket control and the wrist, the back hand can give you a pretty good ball as it will rise up.
      It is cheap and powerful Raigan is not complaining than buying a high rubber danced by manufacturer value and name value.

      See original review

      2019/02/28
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Park (Experience:4〜5 years) Rumored

      Reviews by user

      Rumored stability and security. I am satisfied with both rotation and speed! I raise it easily because it is easy and I feel a momentum because it digests often.
      Because it is light, it seems possible even with special thickness on both sides.

      See original review

      2019/02/27
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Japanese sake mania (Experience:11〜20 years) Perfect

      Reviews by user

      It is lighter in development corresponding to rotation and control-oriented pla! And the price is cheap. I put it on the back, but play has increased considerably in the back band. Even if the face does not fit, back technique is easy to say. There is no speed there, but I can hit the course I'm thinking by firmly grasping the ball. Rotation will take about the same as rosena and more people can put out more. I wonder if the seat is good. I tried middle thickness, thick thickness, special thickness but it is easy to use with three people. Medium thickness is perfect sense of stability, thick thickness is the momentum and rotation that do not lose to other tension rubbers, thickest is the most block and chiquita stabilized.

      See original review

      2019/02/21
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Liger (Experience:6〜10 years) To those who shake and shake!

      Reviews by user

      Backhand, backing method, it is a very good rubber for people who wear back anyway. It stably fits on a table with a moderate arch wire. People who diversify backhand anyway, such as Chiquita, backdrive, block, back to back inquiries should be used. If there is a category called Back rubber only, it will definitely be No. 1.

      See original review

      2019/02/21
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      8
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Dale (Experience:11〜20 years) Ideal for the back side

      Reviews by user

      I did not settle on the reverse side rubber, I saw reviews of this site and various reviews, I listened and chose a table tennis specialty shop. Nothing to conclude! It is ideal for backband with stability and grip performance as in the word. Until now I have used Rosena, Tenazi 64 FX, Luckza 7 Soft, Fastark System etc. In comparison, Ryan's speed falls, but with regard to getting on and lifting it is considerably above the other rubbers, the stability feeling that the ball fits anyway is very high. Moreover, it is easy to do with a tricita and a light backband processing by the pikaichi. It's pretty good back.

      See original review

      2019/02/20
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      REMEMAN (Experience:6〜10 years) There is only absolutely the back of the middle pen! There is a rationale explanation!

      Reviews by user

      This rubber definitely states as the highest rubber on the back of the middle pen!
      For the backside stamping method of a middle pen that requires angle adjustment rather than shake, the grip force that lifts even if the weak touch or impact is weak will be one key to backing. In addition, although head control is another key that requires wrist operation rather than shake, even with thin hitting method, lifting is good, it takes a minimum necessary rotation, swing adjustment is easy. So far with a common rubber! ! I think that the difference is two. First of all, at this price, this price is impossible for other manufacturers. If it is butterfly the performance is not much different from rosena. Another one has almost no variation in solid weight. Surprisingly the rubber has the same thickness even with the weight, but this Raigan scarcely scatters. I tried quite a few sheets at the shop and tried Rhagan to arrive for 2 months. This is also a big merit. Conversely, other rubbers and other manufacturer rubbers have individual differences intense. . . The big one is the same thickness 16 g different quality. Ryan got an average difference of only 4 g. I am concerned about the weight Pen user is thankfully back side rubber.

      See original review

      2019/02/11
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. « First
    2. < Previous
    3. 5
    4. 6
    5. 7
    6. 8
    7. 9
    8. 10
    9. 11
    10. 12
    11. 13
    12. Next >
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!