NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  FACTIVE

  

  This belongs to the Fastarc family, and it's a rubber sold at a lower price to compete with rubbers like Vega, Rozena, and Ventus!
  My first impression was that it puts out a good amount of spin and speed for the price, and feels a bit on the hard side, but it has decent grip on the ball, makes every technique easy, and its biggest feature is how well it handles! It's not too heavy either, so max thickness on both sides is no problem.
  The spin amount is a bit less than Vega, but since it doesn't fly out too much, it's an ideal rubber for players who play close to the table or at mid-distance and focus on topspin rallies. The biggest downside of tension rubbers is usually that their high performance makes them sensitive to the opponent's spin, but this rubber is less affected by incoming spin, like a high-elasticity, high-friction rubber, while still having tension on top of that. I've used it for about three months and it holds up well durability-wise too. It's a rubber with great value for money that should satisfy everyone from beginners to advanced players.

  See original review Hide original review

  ファスターク系に属し、金額も抑え気味でヴェガ、ロゼナ、ヴェンタスあたりを対抗するラバーとして販売されたラバー！
  第一印象は、値段の割には回転もスピードも出る印象、やや硬めなラバーと感じましたが、それなりにグリップ力もありすべての技術ややりやすく、操作性の良さが最大の特徴！それほど重さもないので特厚の両面でも問題なし。
  回転量はヴェガには劣るものの、飛びすぎないため前、中陣でラリー主体のプレイヤーに最適なラバーです。テンション系で最大の欠点は、性能の良さによる相手の回転の影響が受けることですが、このラバーは高弾性高摩擦ラバーみたいに回転の影響を受けにくくなっており、その割、テンションも掛かっており、３か月ぐらい使用しましたが耐久性もあります。コスパの良いラバーで初心者から上級者まで満足いくラバーとなっております。

  2018/04/24

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket KORBEL

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  ROZENA

  

  No particularly special features - an average impression overall. According to an employee at a certain "butterfly" brand, in a blind test it performs on par with Tenergy 64, but I'd describe it more as being like a Tenergy 64 FX.
  The best thing about it is the control. I put it on my backhand, and compared to Tenergy it keeps the bounce down, which makes blocks, chiquitas, and pushes easier, and it's less affected by the opponent's spin - that's its charm!
  On the forehand it feels a bit lacking, but I think it's plenty for female players.

  See original review Hide original review

  特に特別な特徴がなく平均的な印象。某蝶の社員は目隠しだとテナジー64と遜色ない性能とのことですが、テナジー64ＦＸみたいと表現させていただきます。
  一番の良さはコントロールです。バックに貼りましたが、テナジーに比べ、弾みを抑えてため、ブロック、チキータやツッツキがやりやすく、相手の回転の影響を受けづらいのが魅力！
  フォアだと物足りなさを感じますが、女性なら十分だと思います。

  2018/04/24

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Fastarc C-1

  

  I used G-1 a few times, but it didn't have as much power as I expected, so I switched to the slightly softer C-1. First, about the sponge — they say it uses the same sponge as S-1, but it felt harder than I expected. That's probably because the topsheet is on the harder side.
  Overall it feels about 3-4 degrees softer than G-1! I don't think you'd be able to tell blindfolded (lol)
  First impressions from testing it
  It has more speed and spin than G-1! I think that's probably down to swing speed and how you catch the ball.
  It handles every shot competently — if I had to compare it to a Tenergy, I'd say it's like an 80. It feels like an 80 with a bit less spin.
  Overall it's easy to use, works well for intermediate to advanced players, and goes on either forehand or backhand — a real all-rounder.

  See original review Hide original review

  何度かG1を使ってみましたが、　思ったよりも威力がでなかったので、少し柔らかめのC1に変更してみました。まずはスポンジですが、S１と同様のスポンジとのことですが、思ったよりも硬めの印象、おそらくシートが硬めのため、そう感じたのかもしれません。
  全体的にはG１より硬度３～４度ぐらい柔らかくした印象！目隠しして打ったらわからないと思います（笑）
  試打の第一印象
  G1よりもスピードも回転もかかります！おそらくスイングスピードやボールの捉え方によるものだと思います。
  すべてのプレイにそつなくこなすことができ、テナジーでたとえると８０ですね。８０の少し回転量を落とした印象です。
  全体的に使いやすく、中級から上級者向けでフォアでもバックでもどちらでもいけるラバーで優等生といった印象です。

  2018/04/22

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket INFINITY VPS V

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Booster SA

  

  This is the most popular short pips rubber out there.
  Opinions are split between this and the Booster, but this one has a horizontal-pip spin style and fairly large pips!
  By the way, the Morrist has vertical pips.
  I put it on the back of my Nittaku Violin and test-hit with it.
  First off, even switching straight over from inverted rubber, you can use it without any weird feeling.
  The defining feature of this rubber is that, despite being short pips, the amount of spin is amazing!
  Pushes get incredibly heavy backspin.
  If you adjust the angle, you can get proper no-spin balls too.
  Blocking is surprisingly easy to stop the ball with, and the more spin there is, the more it comes back as a knuckle ball.
  It's easy to drive with too, and easy to counter with.
  It's a rubber you can use on both forehand and backhand.
  If I had to name a downside, it's controllable and finishes close to an inverted rubber, so sometimes it doesn't feel very "short pips"-like.
  Also, personally, the sponge is soft, so I'd like it made a bit harder.
  A blade with some special material like carbon in it would be a better match!

  See original review Hide original review

  表ソフトで一番人気があるラバーです。
  モリストとブースターと好みが分かれますが、横目の回転系の表ソフトで粒も大きいですね！
  ちなみにモリストはタテ目です。
  ニッタクのバイオリンの裏面に貼り試打しました。　
  まずは、まったく裏からの変更でも違和感なく使用できます。
  このラバーの特徴は、まずは表なのに回転量がすごいです！
  ツッツキがめちゃめちゃ切れます。
  角度を調整するとちゃんとナックルもでます。
  ブロックは意外と止めやすく、回転量が多いほどナックルになって返ります。
  ドライブも打ちやすくカウンターもしやすいです。
  フォアでもバックでも使えるラバーです。
  欠点をあげるなら、操作性があり裏に近い仕上がりなので、表らしさが感じられないときがあります。
  あと個人的にはスポンジが柔らかいので、もう少し硬めに作ってほしいです。
  ラケットはカーボンなど特殊素材が入ったほうがいいですね！

  2018/04/29

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket VIOLIN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Acoustic Carbon

  

  Over the years I've gone through the string series - Violin → Acoustic → Tenor → Acoustic.
  Hoping that combining FE carbon with the string series would blend the strengths of both, I tried G-1 on the forehand and Moristo SP on the backhand.
  Overall score: 7/10
  Honestly, the unique feel that the string series is known for disappeared, and it just felt like a slightly softer carbon blade to me.
  Compared to the normal Acoustic, the speed on light hits is improved, but when driving it's too stiff, and the ball-holding it's known for gets worse.
  By making the blade thinner they seem to have kept some of that ball-holding feel, but I feel like it doesn't really need to be part of the string series.
  The good points are that it's lighter than the Acoustic, pairs well with short pips or long pips rubber, and is great for a hit-and-flick style of play. I think it suits a smash-focused player better than a drive player.
  As for rubber, rather than G-1, I think Chinese rubber or a softened C1 would work better!

  See original review Hide original review

  歴代、弦楽シリーズのバイオリン→アコースティック→テナー→アコースティックと使ってきました。
  ＦＥカーボンと弦楽シリーズの組み合わせで互いの良さがうまく融合するか期待してフォアにG1、バックにモリストSPを貼ってみました。
  総合評価　7点
  はっきり言って、弦楽シリーズの独特の打球感が消えてしまい、ただの少し柔らかめのカーボンラケットと感じてしまいました。
  ノーマルのアコースティックと比べ、軽打のときのスピードは向上してますが、ドライブの際は硬すぎて本来の球持ちが悪くなってます。
  板厚を薄くすることで、ある程度の球持ちを維持していると思いますが、弦楽シリーズで無くてもいいような気がします。
  良い点は、アコースティックよりも軽く、表ラバーや粒高ラバーに相性がよく、弾くプレーには最適です。ドライブマンよりもスマッシュを主体的な選手に合っていると思います。
  ラバーもG1よりは、中国ラバーもしくは硬度を落としたｃ1のほうが良いでしょう！

  2018/04/22

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Back) Fastarc G-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >