NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  FACTIVE

  

  Rubber that belonged to the Farstalk family and was sold as a rubber to counter Vega, Rosena, Ventas per se, with a reduced amount of money!
  The first impression is the impression that rotation and speed come out in proportion to the price, I felt it was somewhat rigid rubber, but there is also grip power as it is, all the technology and easy to do, good operability is the biggest feature! Since there is not too much weight, there is no problem on both sides of special thickness.
  Although the amount of rotation is inferior to Vega, it is the best rubber for players who are mainly rally based in the front, Nakatsu because it will not fly too far. The biggest disadvantage of the tension system is that it is subject to the influence of the opponent's rotation due to the good performance, but this rubber is less susceptible to the influence of rotation like a high elasticity and high friction rubber, and its tension is also taken I used it for around 3 months, but it also has durability. Rubber satisfied from beginner to advanced in Cospa's good rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  ファスターク系に属し、金額も抑え気味でヴェガ、ロゼナ、ヴェンタスあたりを対抗するラバーとして販売されたラバー！
  第一印象は、値段の割には回転もスピードも出る印象、やや硬めなラバーと感じましたが、それなりにグリップ力もありすべての技術ややりやすく、操作性の良さが最大の特徴！それほど重さもないので特厚の両面でも問題なし。
  回転量はヴェガには劣るものの、飛びすぎないため前、中陣でラリー主体のプレイヤーに最適なラバーです。テンション系で最大の欠点は、性能の良さによる相手の回転の影響が受けることですが、このラバーは高弾性高摩擦ラバーみたいに回転の影響を受けにくくなっており、その割、テンションも掛かっており、３か月ぐらい使用しましたが耐久性もあります。コスパの良いラバーで初心者から上級者まで満足いくラバーとなっております。

  2018/04/24

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket KORBEL

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  ROZENA

  

  There is no special feature and average impression. Although certain butterfly employees are blindfolded and performance that is comparable to Tenazi 64, it is said that it is like Tenazi 64 FX.
  The best is control. Although it stuck on the back, compared to tenazi, because it suppresses the momentum, the block, Tikita and Tsutsuki are easy to do, the charm that it is hard to be affected by the opponent's rotation!
  I feel unsatisfactory if it is a fore, but I think that women are enough.

  See original review Hide original review

  特に特別な特徴がなく平均的な印象。某蝶の社員は目隠しだとテナジー64と遜色ない性能とのことですが、テナジー64ＦＸみたいと表現させていただきます。
  一番の良さはコントロールです。バックに貼りましたが、テナジーに比べ、弾みを抑えてため、ブロック、チキータやツッツキがやりやすく、相手の回転の影響を受けづらいのが魅力！
  フォアだと物足りなさを感じますが、女性なら十分だと思います。

  2018/04/24

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Mizutani Jun ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Fastarc C-1

  

  I tried G1 several times, but it was not as powerful as I thought, so I tried to change it to a slightly soft C1. Although it is a sponge, it is a sponge similar to S1, but it may be a stiff impression than I thought, probably because the sheet is stiff.
  Overall the impression made harder than G1 3 ~ 4 degrees soft! I think that I do not know when blindfolded (haha)
  First impression of trial hit
  It takes speed and rotation more than G1! I think that it is probably due to the swing speed and how to catch the ball.
  You can do all the play without any problems, it is 80 in tenazi. It is an impression that dropped a little rotation amount of 80.
  It is overall easy to use, it is an impression that it is a honor student in the rubber which can be either from the middle to advanced for both the fore or the back.

  See original review Hide original review

  何度かG1を使ってみましたが、　思ったよりも威力がでなかったので、少し柔らかめのC1に変更してみました。まずはスポンジですが、S１と同様のスポンジとのことですが、思ったよりも硬めの印象、おそらくシートが硬めのため、そう感じたのかもしれません。
  全体的にはG１より硬度３～４度ぐらい柔らかくした印象！目隠しして打ったらわからないと思います（笑）
  試打の第一印象
  G1よりもスピードも回転もかかります！おそらくスイングスピードやボールの捉え方によるものだと思います。
  すべてのプレイにそつなくこなすことができ、テナジーでたとえると８０ですね。８０の少し回転量を落とした印象です。
  全体的に使いやすく、中級から上級者向けでフォアでもバックでもどちらでもいけるラバーで優等生といった印象です。

  2018/04/22

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket INFINITY VPS V

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Booster SA

  

  It is the most popular rubber in table software.
  Moristo and booster and taste can be separated, but grain is also large with spread software table software of sideways eye!
  By the way Moristo is a vertical eye.
  I stuck it on the back of the violin of Nitaku and tried it. In case
  First of all, you can use it without incompatibility even with a change from the back side at all.
  The feature of this rubber, although it is a table first, the amount of rotation is amazing!
  Tsutsuki can be overwhelmed.
  When you adjust the angle, I will also knuckle properly.
  The block is easy to stop unexpectedly, and as the amount of rotation increases, it turns into a knuckle and returns.
  It's easy to drive and easy to counter.
  It is a rubber that can be used for both fore and back.
  If raising a drawback, there are operability and finish close to the back, so there may be times when you do not feel like being visible.
  Personally, because the sponge is soft, I want you to make it a little harder.
  It is better for a racket to contain special materials such as carbon!

  See original review Hide original review

  表ソフトで一番人気があるラバーです。
  モリストとブースターと好みが分かれますが、横目の回転系の表ソフトで粒も大きいですね！
  ちなみにモリストはタテ目です。
  ニッタクのバイオリンの裏面に貼り試打しました。　
  まずは、まったく裏からの変更でも違和感なく使用できます。
  このラバーの特徴は、まずは表なのに回転量がすごいです！
  ツッツキがめちゃめちゃ切れます。
  角度を調整するとちゃんとナックルもでます。
  ブロックは意外と止めやすく、回転量が多いほどナックルになって返ります。
  ドライブも打ちやすくカウンターもしやすいです。
  フォアでもバックでも使えるラバーです。
  欠点をあげるなら、操作性があり裏に近い仕上がりなので、表らしさが感じられないときがあります。
  あと個人的にはスポンジが柔らかいので、もう少し硬めに作ってほしいです。
  ラケットはカーボンなど特殊素材が入ったほうがいいですね！

  2018/04/29

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket VIOLIN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Acoustic Carbon

  

  I used violin → acoustic → tenor → acoustic in the string series.
  I tried putting G1 on the fore and Moristo SP on the back, expecting that the merits of each other merge successfully with a combination of FE carbon and string series.
  Overall rating 7 points
  Clearly, the unique shot feeling of the string series disappeared, I felt it was just a slightly soft carbon racket.
  Compared with normal acoustic, the speed of light strokes is improving, but in the case of a drive it is too hard and the original ball holding is getting worse.
  I think that maintaining a certain degree of ball holding by thinning the plate thickness, I feel that it is not necessary to be a string series.
  A good point is lighter than an acoustic, it is compatible with table rubber and grain height rubber, it is best for playing. I think smash is more suitable for a player who is more independent than Drive Man.
  Rubber is also better than G1, China rubber or c1 with reduced hardness!

  See original review Hide original review

  歴代、弦楽シリーズのバイオリン→アコースティック→テナー→アコースティックと使ってきました。
  ＦＥカーボンと弦楽シリーズの組み合わせで互いの良さがうまく融合するか期待してフォアにG1、バックにモリストSPを貼ってみました。
  総合評価　7点
  はっきり言って、弦楽シリーズの独特の打球感が消えてしまい、ただの少し柔らかめのカーボンラケットと感じてしまいました。
  ノーマルのアコースティックと比べ、軽打のときのスピードは向上してますが、ドライブの際は硬すぎて本来の球持ちが悪くなってます。
  板厚を薄くすることで、ある程度の球持ちを維持していると思いますが、弦楽シリーズで無くてもいいような気がします。
  良い点は、アコースティックよりも軽く、表ラバーや粒高ラバーに相性がよく、弾くプレーには最適です。ドライブマンよりもスマッシュを主体的な選手に合っていると思います。
  ラバーもG1よりは、中国ラバーもしくは硬度を落としたｃ1のほうが良いでしょう！

  2018/04/22

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Back） Fastarc G-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >