Acoustic

Everyone's rating

[Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Control and Spin are excellent.

(Click to show big size)

Averages reviews points

Evaluation: 8.89 / 10

Number of review: 57

Speed：6.79
Spin：8.7
Control：9.21

: The Nittaku Acoustic was made according to the principles used in making string instruments. The materials used for this blade are thicker and softer than those in the Nittaku Violin. This provides the Acoustic with stable characteristics when attacking and blocking. Made in Japan.

FL
ST

Specifications

Producer: Nittaku

Product code: NE-67

Speed: Mid

Touch: Middle

Size: 157 × 150mm

Weight: 85g

Material: 5 sheets

Thickness: 5.7mm

Players use Acoustic

User reviews

Post a review

All Monthly

Ina （Experience：More than ２０ years） Stable

I was wandering around by changing the racket, but I settled down on the acoustic with few mistakes in the game.
I think it's easy to win the game because it's fast and powerful, but there are few mistakes and the tabletop is stable.

See original review Hide original review

2022/04/06

Overall	9/10
Speed	8
Spin	9
Control	9
Touch	10
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) Dignics 09C

Recommended rubber (Backhand) Fastarc C-1

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

3

Emon Tsukudani （Experience：More than ２０ years） God racket with outstanding operability

I bought it on Amazon for 12000 yen. Double-sided tenergy special hot. Before hitting this racket, I used to use Hadlow vr a lot, but compared to that, I got the impression that the shot feeling was quite soft and did not bounce. However, instead, it takes a lot of rotation, and I feel that the control performance has improved. Therefore, I would like to strongly recommend this racket to those who are stable-minded and who emphasize control.

See original review Hide original review

2021/05/12

Overall	10/10
Speed	6
Spin	8
Control	9
Touch	10
Hardness	Soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

Recommended rubber (Backhand) TENERGY 80

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

5

kaoru （Experience：６〜１０ years） Any rubber fits

The racket was straying, but it was acoustic and calm.
No matter what kind of rubber you put on it, it will bring out the goodness.
Although it is a battle type that mainly hits meat, the effect or speed of bending is more than I expected.
Although it is a back grain, the block is very easy to hold down and stable.
It is a very good racket.

See original review Hide original review

2021/05/11

Overall	10/10
Speed	8
Spin	10
Control	10
Touch	10
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) GORIKI KAISOKU

Recommended rubber (Backhand) NUMBER 1

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

7

Hanya （Experience：２〜３ years） A sense of stability is God

I used table software for the back, and I used to use it for a racket with carbon, but there were many mistakes when I hit it myself, so I arrived at this racket for a sense of stability. .. Since the ball has a good hold, the arch line comes out firmly, you can drive even on the front, and it is very easy to do rotating techniques such as Chiquita and Reverse Chiquita! That doesn't mean that the knuckle doesn't come out, so I think it's a racket that makes the most of the characteristics of rubber. It definitely goes well with Morist sp, so please use it.

See original review Hide original review

2021/04/29

Overall	10/10
Speed	8
Spin	10
Control	10
Touch	9
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1

Recommended rubber (Backhand) Moristo SP

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

7

Whelk x pudding Best as a plywood racket

It's broken and can't be used anymore, but I'll write it for memorial service.

At first, I was looking for a racket to replace Kong Linghui, which was out of print for Butterfly, and I bought it because I thought it would be good.

The grip was a thin and easy-to-hold racket.
* I saw another person's racket, but I think there are quite a few individual differences in grip.

I think that it is a racket with a good ball holding that stretches Andro's Lazant (discontinued) and takes a firm rotation.

Recently, I think that the combination of racket and racket should be made by the same manufacturer.

See original review Hide original review

2021/02/27

Overall	9/10
Speed	8
Spin	10
Control	10
Touch	9
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1

Recommended rubber (Backhand) Fastarc G-1

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

4

Dai-chan junior high school teacher （Experience：１１〜２０ years） THE 5 sheets

It is a standard five plywood.
It is THE 5 with a good ball holding that is different from the recent 5 flying

A versatile racket that does not kill performance no matter what rubber is attached
Excellent compatibility with table software in particular

Excellent control performance
The reason is a uniform blade
Since the sweet spot is wide, the ball goes wherever you want.
I wish the price was already 5000 yen cheaper ...

See original review Hide original review

2020/12/24

Overall	8/10
Speed	6
Spin	8
Control	7
Touch	7
Hardness	Little soft

Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1

Recommended rubber (Backhand) Fastarc C-1

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

6

Dumplings （Experience：４〜５ years） The highest peak of wood

First of all, what should be noted about this racket is & # 39; pure wood & # 39 ;. Comfortable shot feeling, moderate ball holding, moderate momentum. There are some rackets in the same series that contain special materials, but this racket is rather soft and easy to handle. In terms of speed, acoustic carbon and inner ver. Will be more popular, but there is also the splendor realized because of the wood such as shot feeling and ball holding.
I have stuck various kinds of rubber such as grains, front and anti on the back, but this racket did not destroy the individuality of each rubber.
I put all kinds of momentum rubber such as leopard, bright stream, and rosena on the fore, but I was not dissatisfied at all.
Acoustic carbon is used for back tables and athletes seeking speed.
I think this acoustic is suitable for players who seek stability.

See original review Hide original review

2020/09/21