Fastarc G-1

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little hard
[Performance] Spin and Speed to have excellent
Fastarc G-1

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 8.86 / 10
  • 447 reviews
    • Speed:8.06
    • Spin:8.85
    • Control:8

    Most players are looking for that rubber that fits them just right. Nittaku has introduced the Fastarc series with a variety to choose from. The Fastarc G-1 has the most power of the series. It's a very direct and to the point rubber. All offensive strokes from fast drives at the table to long distance counterlooping are executed with high precision. The hardest and fastest of all the Fastarcs.

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    6,800 Yen(Include tax 7,480 Yen)
    Producer
    Nittaku
    Product code
    NR-8702
    Speed
    98
    Spin
    93
    Control
    51
    Hardness
    Middle hard
    Customer Reviews SummaryAI Summary
    Highly evaluated as a standard German tension rubber with proven track record among top players and versatile performance, yet many note it requires strong impact technique and is not suitable for all player types. Durability and cost-effectiveness are central to its support.
    ■ Frequently Mentioned Points
    • Versatility: Compatible with drives, attacks, table techniques and more
    • Durability and longevity: Lasts longer than Tenergy or Dignics
    • Grip power: Holds the ball firmly for stability
    • Impact-dependent: Best for powerful hitters; weak contact causes drops
    • Highly rated for backhand: Excellent stability and ease of use
    ■ Representative Voices
    ▲ PositiveA German rubber that produces curveballs and enables various techniques like drives, smashes, and counters to be executed easily. Achieves high-level spin and speed, with excellent longevity. Recommended for students and intermediate players.
    ▽ CriticalWhen trying to add strong spin with heavy impact, the ball sometimes slides. Not suitable for power hitters. Feels like a previous generation rubber with no distinctive characteristics, making it not worth the high cost.

    Reviews by user

    • visitor

      ito (Experience: Less than a year) Stable drives, easy to handle

      Reviews by user

      You can hit stable, good drives with it. However, since it only produces "honest" (predictable) balls, once you get to a certain level it starts to feel a bit lacking.

      See original review

      2021/10/13
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      8
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Swat Carbon

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Anonymous (Experience: 2〜3 years)

      Reviews by user

      I switched from Super Ventus. It was a good rubber, but I felt like Super Ventus generated more spin, so I think I'll switch back (since I use loop drives a lot). I think this one gives more speed though.

      See original review

      2021/10/10
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      8
      Control
      7
      Hardness Little hard
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Kuromame (Experience: 2〜3 years) Using MAX sponge thickness

      Reviews by user

      This is a comparison with max thickness.
      Equipment used:
      Blade: Acoustic Carbon
      Forehand: regular Hurricane Blue Sponge, max thickness
      Backhand: G1 MAX
      Weight:
      Max thickness: about 49g
      MAX: about 56g
      Bounce, ball quality, spin, and other things:
      MAX definitely has more bounce.
      Since the sponge is thicker, the ball sinks in a lot more too.
      With MAX it's easier to produce both a flatter trajectory and a more arced one.
      Roughly speaking, MAX tends toward a flatter trajectory, while the max-thick version is more arced.
      MAX feels softer on contact.
      Blocks with MAX come out with more arc.
      The max-thick version is a bit flatter.
      There's not much difference in spin amount.
      Chops with MAX come out a bit higher.
      Probably because they come out higher, the spin on those chops is a bit weaker than with the max-thick version.
      As for durability, MAX might have a slight edge.
      Max-thick works well on the backhand side, MAX on both sides.
      I'd recommend an acoustic-type blade for this.
      Hope this is useful as a reference.

      See original review

      2021/09/26
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Acoustic Carbon

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      MacBook (Experience: 2〜3 years) The strongest‼︎

      Reviews by user

      I bought it in max thickness for both sides. It just bounces a ton, and since it keeps its spin performance, control is still solid.
      The easiest technique to pull off is countering. When the ball really sinks deep into the sponge, it produces monstrous speed and spin. I'll be sticking with this one until I've saved up more money. Recommended.

      See original review

      2021/08/20
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use MA LIN EXTRA SPECIAL

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      koburakuda32 Used it back in the day

      Reviews by user

      Comparing this with Tenergy 05:
      Speed: Tenergy > G-1
      Spin: Tenergy ≤ G-1
      Ease of getting arc: Tenergy ≒ G-1
      Push: Tenergy ≒ G-1
      Stop (how easy it is to stop the ball): Tenergy ≤ G-1
      Short game: Tenergy ≤ G-1
      Chop (consistency): Tenergy ≤ G-1
      Chop (spin): Tenergy ≒ G-1
      Chop (ease of producing a no-spin ball): Tenergy < G-1
      That's roughly how it feels.
      Hope this is helpful as a reference.

      See original review

      2021/06/25
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Acoustic Carbon

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience: 4〜5 years) It really holds the ball…

      Reviews by user

      Flicks stop dead on the table, over and over!
      The short game is easy, and topspin drives over the table in particular feel incredibly stable.
      Drives turn into monster shots when you hit the sweet spot, but it's tough if you miss it.
      If you swing all the way through, you get a good ball.
      Maybe it's easier to use on backhand?

      See original review

      2021/05/30
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use KOKI NIWA

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      student (Experience: 6〜10 years) Wouldn't recommend it

      Reviews by user

      These are my impressions after using it for about 2-3 weeks.
      It had no bounce and spin was hard to generate, so it was really difficult to play with. Whenever the ball hit near the edge of the blade, the topsheet would tear right away and fall apart. The topsheet is extremely fragile and not very usable, so I can't really recommend it.

      See original review

      2021/05/21
      All
      5/10
      Speed
      6
      Spin
      5
      Control
      3
      Hardness Soft

      Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. « First
    2. 5
    3. 6
    4. 7
    5. 8
    6. 9
    7. 10
    8. 11
    9. 12
    10. 13
    11. Last »
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style