Rakza X

Everyone's rating

[Hardness] Little hard
[Performance] Spin and Speed to have excellent

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

Rating: 8.51 / 10

149 reviews

Speed:7.9
Spin:8.52
Control:7.76

: RAKZA X table tennis rubber from Yasaka is the latest addition to the popular and highly successful RAXZA series of Yasaka rubbers. The top sheet is a mainly natural rubber gum, employing a new production method.
The result is a top surface with exceptional grip enabling both phenomenal spin and speed. These qualities reduce the margin for error. This top sheet is then combined with a harder “Power Sponge”. The resulting combination of a faster sponge and high grip top sheet enables you to place the ball accurately with a high degree of success.
Serves and short returns are both very sharp, similar to the Rakza 7 and Rakza 9.
RAKZA X – yet another winning combination from Yasaka!

Pimples in

Specifications

Producer: Yasaka

Product code: B-82

Speed: 11

Spin: 13+

Control: 10

Hardness: 45~50 °

Players use Rakza X

Reviews by user

Post a review

All Month

Naka （Experience：２〜３ years） It will stabilize.

The drive will rotate steady. I think that the lifespan is also quite long.

See original review Hide original review

2017/08/11

All	8/10
Speed	8
Spin	7
Control	7
Hardness	Little hard

Racket recommended use MA LIN EXTRA OFFENSIVE

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

2

Tats （Experience：２〜３ years） If it meets timber than special material

When I was using it on the forest carbon on the forest, I could not feel the grip which is a characteristic and because the rotation was difficult, the lucky 7 was a god rubber but I thought that X was a shit.
But when sticking it on soft wood, rubbing strikes with excellent grip feeling! I think that the compatibility with the racket is important as well.

See original review Hide original review

2017/07/16

All	7/10
Speed	7
Spin	8
Control	6
Hardness	Hard

Racket recommended use TOMETATSU

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

4

People of the Kyoto Leopard （Experience：２〜３ years） It is surprisingly easy to use

I was using lucky Xsoft, but because I was too soft it changed to Rakuza X.
It is used on the back side.
Tsutski, stop: It can be torn down terribly. There was no sense to fly as freely as a rubber of the tension system because it is Hybrid Energy type.
Chiquita: Tikita, which focused on upper rotation, had the power to take direct score.
It is because of my skill shortage of Chiquita focusing on transverse rotation, there were many overs.
Drive: I feel strongly that I have lifted it. The amount of rotation when rubbing with gorges took on the same level as the sticky rubber.
There is a considerable sense of speed when driving to hit.
Overall: The maximum value of rotation and speed is high. However, when the touch became weak, or when you could not hit with sufficient posture, it could have been a halfway ball.
This rubber is recommended for those who are intermediate to advanced. I am also happy that the lifetime is long.

See original review Hide original review

2017/07/10

All	10/10
Speed	9
Spin	9
Control	10
Hardness	Little hard

Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

8

Nyakky ★ （Experience：６〜１０ years）

I think that it fits in the back because it is slightly stiff because it is oriented towards the fore but firmly able to swing.

Individual differences are large so we recommend weight designation or weighing.

I think that the height of the arcuate is well oriented toward the front middle because it is just a little lower than Tenazi 05.
It is noticeable because it is not slip on non slip seat, but it is careful as the influence of the opponent's rotation is considerably affected.

See original review Hide original review

2017/06/02

All	7/10
Speed	6
Spin	6
Control	4
Hardness	Little hard

Racket recommended use INFINITY VPS V

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

13

Tamatama

Although it is a rubber with a considerably long life in recent high performance rubber, I think that it is the limit that 3 months can maintain performance.

The person who strikes and strikes is more stable than rubbing.
I think that there are considerable differences depending on hardness, so we recommend purchasing with weight specified.

I felt it was a strong rubber hook with a strong horizontal stiffness though the seat feels stiff when pushed.
Although it takes a turn, unlike the recent spin system tension, it does not take as long as you do it yourself.
The power of a drive is up to the arm, but it is obedient and habitless rubber.

I think that it is for junior high school students and higher players with some power.

See original review Hide original review

2017/06/01

All	8/10
Speed	6
Spin	8
Control	8
Hardness	Little soft

Racket recommended use Ma Long Five

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

7

Yu Shrine （Experience：４〜５ years） Satisfied with rotation

It is one of the lucky series.
X is awesome because it sells grip power.
The arc line is higher.
However, because the momentum is quite strong, it is not suitable for beginners

See original review Hide original review

2017/05/28

All	9/10
Speed	8
Spin	10
Control	8
Hardness	Little hard

Racket recommended use INFINITY VPS V

Was this review helpful to you? Like!

13

To win （Experience：２〜３ years） All-Japan club championship appearance

It is a transition from tenazi 05. I would like to compare it with tenazi.
The rotation of the drive is equal to or more than tenazi 05. However, when the state collapses, tenazi will take. Stability is the win of Rakuza X which is easy to fly up with grip power. Tachibana technology stops tenazy is lower and a good ball goes but sinks and flicks are easier for lucky X. Rakuza X was a rubber that was insensitive to rotation and very spinning compared to tenazi. However, tenazy was good at counters and blocks. If you want the disgust and stability of the receive, the ease of attack, if you want lucky X, stops and counters on the platform, if you want rotation, tenazie 05 is good. I was sorry. Lucky X Please try it.

See original review Hide original review

2017/05/20